Yep.. i'd like to know the same. Seems like that same thing has happend to
me too. Today I tried to do a CVS commit and i got a "[server aborted]:
commit requires write access to the repository"
I's this right? What's the inactivity period before write access is
revoked??
Regards,
Hiram
> ---
why did they do that?
- Original Message -
From: "Andy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 6:39 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Good-bye
> Hi Geeks
>
> Yesterday my CVS RW access to JBoss was revoked and therefore
> I will not work o
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1035
Successful tests: 1026
Errors:8
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-12-21.01-47 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_
Hi Holger
There is not further support from my side because I am not
a JBoss developer anymore. So check this with Bill Burke.
Andy
- Original Message -
From: "Holger Engels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 19, 2002 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] E
Hi Geeks
Yesterday my CVS RW access to JBoss was revoked and therefore
I will not work on the JBoss project at all.
Unfortunately this also means that I cannot update my changes to the
Quick Start Guide and the EJB Timer Service I was working on.
Even though that it makes me angry that I spent ma
Bugs item #647648, was opened at 2002-12-02 23:50
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=647648&group_id=22866
>Category: JBossMX
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dorothy Gantenbein (dgantenbein)
Assigned t
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 991
Successful tests: 984
Errors:6
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2002-12-20.12-11 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
[
> Did you have a look at bug 598335? We logged this against
> the URLDirectoryScanner for netboot deployments. There is
> also a proposed fix which we would like to see incorporated
> into your code if it is still applicable.
>
> Thanks,
> Kev
>
Kevin
I hadn't, but have now. I have not c
Does anyone have any experience to share about the performance
differences between the following 2 scenarios. Each scenario has the
app running in JBoss with colocated web and ejb tiers.
Scenario 1:
multiple machines, each machine running an instance of JBoss.
Scenario 2:
one machine running m
The only way to avoid dirty reads I think is at the JDBC isolation level and
setting the Isolation level to SERIALIZED.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Peter
> Antman
> Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 9:12 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTEC
Hi,
maybe have have missed something in the specs or just am igonrant, but I
know what I now will explained used to work:
Doing a findByXXX at the same time from different threads, where the
thread will compete about being the first one to create an entity, which
the other one should use if found
Sorry to come in on this late.
> I have commited changes to URLDeploymentScanner that use
> WebDAV to scan
> http: locations, allowing the same config to be booted locally or via
> netboot.
Did you have a look at bug 598335? We logged this against
the URLDirectoryScanner for netboot deployments
> Is this in standard JBoss or only when doing clustering? Any specific
> JBoss version?
It is not started as part of "default" but only from "all" in all 3.x
release (3.0, 3.2, 4.0). If you want it as part of default, add
cluster-service.xml in deploy and remove any unneeded services from it such
Interesting...
Is this in standard JBoss or only when doing clustering? Any specific
JBoss version?
/L
fredagen den 20 december 2002 kl 07.24 skrev Bill Burke:
If you provide no provider url, the jnid client will do a multicast
broadcast to find jndi server.
Bill
--
14 matches
Mail list logo
