=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
The 3.2 jmx module has its own logging package that duplicates the functionality
of the common module logging framework, and does so incompatbility. If I set
the org.jboss.mx.loading category logging level to common module
org.jboss.logging.XLevel#TRACE
I am getting a ClassCastException due to the
The following two tests are consistently timing out in runs of the testsuite in 3.2:
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.entity.test.PathologicalUnitTestCase FAILED (timeout)
[junit] TEST org.jboss.test.lock.test.EnterpriseEntityStressTestCase FAILED
(timeout)
Can you look into these if you know
I am seeing more errors on an OSX run with 1.3.1 I just made, but not
near the number you are seeing. The summary will be mail out shortly. I
am seeing a problem with tomcat not looking up the java:comp binding
correctly so perhaps if I resolve that it will help.
Scott Sta
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1144
Successful tests: 1127
Errors:16
Failures: 1
[time of test: 2003-03-22.02-33 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1
As a consequence, we needed ant 1.5, so that has been incorporated as
well.
We can now build and run everything on a Mac again, even under JDK
1.4.1.
Steve Coy
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:Crypto Challenge is now open!
Get crackin
Hi,
Have you tried this on any unix boxes recently?
Both my Mac and Linux boxes yield over 150 errors using 1.4.1 and over
50 using 1.3.1.
I run the "all" configuration.
Most of the errors seem to be deployment related in one way or another.
For example, the "bank" and "bankiiop" tests fail
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1146
Successful tests: 1138
Errors:8
Failures: 0
[time of test: 2003-03-21.23-39 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1_
Bugs item #707784, was opened at 2003-03-21 23:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707784&group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Bob Cotton (bcotton969)
Assigned to: Scott
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
I'll be waiting to catch the flotsam work if/when that happens. I'm sure a lot of us
"minor players" will.
Still, my question stands- Sun could have downloaded JBoss and tested it on their own,
couldn't they? Why make comments like "we don't think they'll pass" then?
-Original Message
Bugs item #650929, was opened at 2002-12-09 16:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=650929&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Strachan (strachancambs)
Bugs item #707730, was opened at 2003-03-21 15:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707730&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Hobot (hobot)
Assigned to: Nob
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1098
Successful tests: 1093
Errors:1
Failures: 4
[time of test: 2003-03-21.12-53 GMT]
[java.version: 1.3.1]
Don't be too sure that there isn't a number of months of effort to pass the
conformance suite. There are lots of edge cases and areas of interpretation
when implementing from a spec. There are also stupid things in specs that
implementers chose to implement differently with just cause.
Certainly t
Sacha,
>> Regarding #2, I find the current state of /deploy to be
>> highly intuitive, personally. Would it be possible to make
>> your scheme work by giving .sar's the ability to be nested?
>> That way, /deploy/JMS.sar (a directory) could contain
>> jms-foo.sar and jms-bar.sar.
>That's a
Bugs item #707730, was opened at 2003-03-21 21:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707730&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Hobot (hobot)
Assigned to: Nob
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
Bugs item #706494, was opened at 2003-03-19 12:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=706494&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Ciarniello (dciarni
Bugs item #650929, was opened at 2002-12-09 15:54
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=650929&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 5
Submitted By: James Strachan (strachancambs)
muy bien (my spanish half takes over during the war)
much needed simplifications.
> 2°) IMHO, way to many files exist in /deploy
> This is counterintuitive for jboss-users: it may be fine for
> jboss developers but I don't think it is ok for simple users.
Agreed
> First suggestion: we add a n
Bugs item #704856, was opened at 2003-03-17 09:15
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=704856&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 6
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assi
Hi,
Stephens noteworthy effort finally triggered me to backport the
current jboss.net xdoclet facilities from HEAD
to the 3.2 branch (and to fix the bloody view-type="both" problem).
Best,
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesendet: Freitag, 21.
Bugs item #704855, was opened at 2003-03-17 09:14
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=704855&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: CVS HEAD
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dr. Christoph Georg Jung (cgjung)
Assi
Hi,
Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was
being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger
anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in
org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in
Branch_3_2, but I can't see any a
I was able to build with Sun JDK 1.4.1_02 on a win2k box.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Kimpton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 3:03 PM
There is not the main directory in /jboss-3.0.6-src/ejb
Where can i find it?
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Coy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 10:03 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Branch_3_2 has been updated to xdoclet 1.2
> I've updated the bui
I've updated the build.xml files to use xdoclet 1.2 (pre b3).
It has the same jars as HEAD, although with correspondingly different
names.
I suspect that we should change these at some point to include version
info like a lot of the other jars.
i will tackle Branch_3_0 next, unless anyone has
=
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS=
=
JAVA VERSION DETAILS
java version "1.4.1_02"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar
I will cater for backporting the jboss.net 1.2 module into the 3.2 branch.
It is used (in CVS) in the jboss.net testsuite which is still decoupled from
the main testsuite
as long as J2EE1.4 is not mandatory.
CGJ
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gesen
Bugs item #706494, was opened at 2003-03-19 12:07
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=706494&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Dan Ciarniello (dciarni
Bugs item #707485, was opened at 2003-03-21 13:16
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707485&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anon
At least the copy in HEAD is actually for xdoclet 1.2. When I migrated
HEAD to xdoclet 1.2 I basically ignored the jboss.net xdoclet task. I'd
say if the testsuite is OK, it is safe to ignore and let the jboss.net
folks fix if there is a problem later.
thanks
david jencks
On 2003.03.20 17:44 S
It's interesting, since I didn't think anyone in JBoss was bluffing.
Question, though: JBoss is free, right? Therefore, before Sun goes around with the
bravado, couldn't they have downloaded JBoss and run it against the compliance suite
to know if it would pass or not? It seems to me that, if
I'd like to make a proposal to support JBoss tooling:
Usecase: For examplea JMX and JNDI client that need to access
different versions of JBoss servers.
Problem:
1.) The client libs for example between 3.0.6 and 3.2.0RC3 are
incompatible. Accessing JMX for a 3.2.0 with client libs of 3.0.6
leads
Bugs item #707400, was opened at 2003-03-21 09:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707400&group_id=22866
>Category: None
Group: v3.2
>Status: Deleted
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simone (milasx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (
Bugs item #707400, was opened at 2003-03-21 09:53
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=707400&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Simone (milasx)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous (n
Hi,
Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was
being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger
anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in
org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in
Branch_3_2, but I can't see any a
Bugs item #706799, was opened at 2003-03-20 10:31
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=706799&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 3
Submitted By: Dheeraj Srivastava (dheeraj_s)
>Assigned to: aus
39 matches
Mail list logo
