[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-23 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.4.1_02" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Tom Elrod
I don't want to steal too much of Marc's thunder on this (he has a great vision for JBoss 4), but one of the goals of JBoss 4 is to make it so developers don't have to deal with all the J2EE APIs (which honestly add a lot of overhead in development time as well as training/study time to learn it al

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Nick Betteridge
Certification tests are important for corporates - they protect their investment in development by ensuring that if one companies vision (ie jboss/websphere etc) goes belly-up then switching to another server will provide the least set of headaches. Tom Elrod wrote: > > IMHO, I don't know that

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Brian Wallis
On Mon, 24 Mar 2003 16:42, Tom Elrod wrote: > IMHO, I don't know that passing the certification tests now would be of > much benefit to JBoss. The biggest drawback I can see is that with JBoss > 4, we will be moving people away from having to deal with all the extra API > non-sense that J2EE devel

RE: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Tom Elrod
IMHO, I don't know that passing the certification tests now would be of much benefit to JBoss. The biggest drawback I can see is that with JBoss 4, we will be moving people away from having to deal with all the extra API non-sense that J2EE developers have to deal with today. Just write your POJO

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-23 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.4.1_02" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Dave Neuer
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Dave Neuer > wrote: > > > --- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> The more tests we have the better we will be, but > I > >> doubt that sun will > >> let us check the TDK into CVS, so it will be

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 07:30 PM, Dave Neuer wrote: --- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The more tests we have the better we will be, but I doubt that sun will let us check the TDK into CVS, so it will be worthless to everyone but the few JBoss employees that get access. -dain Is a

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Dave Neuer
--- Dain Sundstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The more tests we have the better we will be, but I > doubt that sun will > let us check the TDK into CVS, so it will be > worthless to everyone but > the few JBoss employees that get access. > > -dain Is a condition of the TDK license that you

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Sunday, March 23, 2003, at 04:19 PM, Stefan Arentz wrote: On Saturday, Mar 22, 2003, at 23:03 Europe/Amsterdam, Tom Coleman wrote: Personally, certification is irrelevant to me. My criteria is whether or not the product gets the job done. I think certification serves to answer that que

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-23 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.4.1_02" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

Re: [JBoss-dev] Jboss/David Vs. Sun/Goliath?

2003-03-23 Thread Stefan Arentz
On Saturday, Mar 22, 2003, at 23:03 Europe/Amsterdam, Tom Coleman wrote: ... Personally, certification is irrelevant to me. My criteria is whether or not the product gets the job done. I think certification serves to answer that question for people who don't know how to figure it out for t

[JBoss-dev] 风险代理 胜诉收费

2003-03-23 Thread jiaobh
Title: Ö´ÒµÂÉʦΪÄú·þÎñ ·çÏÕ´úÀí ʤËßÊÕ·Ñ     ¸ù¾ÝĿǰËßËÏÄÑ¡¢Ö´ÐÐÄÑ¡¢ËßËϳɱ¾¸ß¡¢ËßËÏÐ§ÒæµÍµÄÉç»áÏÖÏó£¬ÏÖÍÆ³ö²¿·Ö·çÏÕ´úÀí·½Ê½£¬ÒÔ¼õÇáίÍÐÈ˾­¼Ã¸ºµ££¬Ò²¼¤ÀøÂÉʦ¸ßЧ¡¢¾¡ÔðµØÍê³É´úÀíÊÂÏî¡£·çÏÕ´úÀíÊÇÖ¸¸ù¾ÝÂÉʦÊÂÎñËù ÓëίÍÐÈËÖ®¼äµÄÔ¼¶¨£¬Î¯ÍÐÈËÔݲ»Ö§¸¶È«²¿»ò²¿·ÖÓйطÑÓ㬴ýÆäծȨʵÏÖ»òÆä

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-23 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.4.1_02" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-679705 ] 3.0.6 fails to start with AbstractMethodError on IBM 1.4 VM

2003-03-23 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #679705, was opened at 2003-02-03 19:40 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=679705&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me Priority: 5 Submitted By: Stefan Kuehnel (skuehne

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-23 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.4.1_02" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar

[JBoss-dev] [AUTOMATED] (HEAD) JBoss compilation failed

2003-03-23 Thread chris
= ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net FOR DETAILS= = JAVA VERSION DETAILS java version "1.4.1_02" Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standar