Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=709559group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=709559group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to:
Bugs item #709559, was opened at 2003-03-25 18:51
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=709559group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Heiko W.Rupp (pilhuhn)
Assigned to:
Hi,
Yep - tried with and without... but you'd think it would be
consistent if that was the problem - ant would either have enough
memory or not...
Thanks,
Chris
--- Stephen Coy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Have you tried the equivalent of this sort of thing in your script?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I guess this is a question for Jeremy Boynes. Nevertheless, I think to
remember that being able to have this would also mean fixing some
classloading behaviour in Jasper.
Cheers,
Sacha
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I just posted a reply in the tracker, and bounced him to you for
RussianDoll issues - tag :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Sacha Labourey
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 7:02 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [
Hi,
.cvsignore file were recently removed from HEAD and replaced with global
$CVSROOT/cvsignore file. Unfortunately, Eclipse does not read $CVSROOT/cvsignore and
shows all project/output directories as outgoing changes. Will anybody mind if I put
.cvsignore files back?
Igor Fedorenko
Think
Bugs item #710149, was opened at 2003-03-26 16:41
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710149group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Rod Burgett (rodburgett)
Assigned to:
You have read/write correct?
I guess that was exactly what I wanted to know ;-)
Javassist may not be creating the correct
throws clauses. Can you add a test for this under the
testsuite and under
aop/? I will look at it after I finish my other aop work I'm doing.
Done. Added
Bugs item #710204, was opened at 2003-03-26 10:05
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710204group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Han Ming ONG (hanming)
Assigned to: Nobody/Anonymous
Bugs item #707730, was opened at 2003-03-21 20:58
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=707730group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v3.0 Rabbit Hole
Status: Closed
Resolution: Works For Me
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Michal Hobot (hobot)
Assigned
Bugs item #710396, was opened at 2003-03-26 15:09
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=710396group_id=22866
Category: CatalinaBundle
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Submitted By: Stefan Reich (sreich)
Assigned to: Scott M
I have implemented a new AOP service for Serializable POJOs, Versioned
Objects. You can transactionally version an object. If you modify the
object within a transaction, this modification is not seen by other
transactions. If the tx commits, the changes seen, if a rollback happens
the changes
I just want to give credit to Julien Viet as well who pitched that idea
when he was in ATL,
kudos Bill, you are in orbit, the pings in your head, the code in CVS,
let them fight, let's move
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of
second revolution,
I just can't say how excited I am.
We are doing magic, critical mass.
Julien goes I got a silly idea..
bill makes it real, there is war..
we are doing RAW stuff, and rarely
was I that excited about it all...
you ain't seen nothing yet wankers
PLgC
marcf
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use
Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements (you
learn something new every day). It specifically excludes inherited
methods, so we can use it to verify if a primary key has actually
implemented hashCode and equals.
Too bad that the whole world is more intretsed whether or not JBOSS will
become J2EE certified.
I was reading an article about Unintended Consequences that made me
think of the current J2EE cerification vs. JBOSS 4.0 with AOP.
In 1349 the black plague was spreading around Europe. In castles
So in the quest to impove J2EE have you killed it?
bla bla bla bla
marc fleury wrote:
do you motherfuckers realize how BIG this is?
obviously some of you don't get it, give it time, it will become very
obvious
enough wasted time in the U.N. Time for some good ol' action
marcf
The story about the flees was pretty good though, but kind of irrelevant
:)
marcf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of marc fleury
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned
:rotfl .. a Frenchman wanting action
This is hot shit. Plain and simple. Take the J2EE spec and piss all over
it. When you wrote it your mind was small and feeble, we have seen the
light.
The question is how long before the world realizes it or does J2EE
implode and we all are paying
Dave,
Think about this. If we wait for the spec to implement the kind of stuff
dot net is doing, J2EE is dead anyhow. At 10K per CPU J2EE is dead as well.
We are moving to a commodity based infrastructure, dot net can play so can
open source and IBM. Not sure too many others can join the
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use
Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements
(you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes
inherited methods, so we can use it to verify if a primary key has
actually implemented
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave
Smith
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 9:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
Too bad that the whole world is more intretsed whether or
Bill,
This is fabulous stuff. Good job.
Is there a way we might be able to use the AOP xml to dynamically do
your example below (as well as the clustered and remoting) for POJOs
during construction time? In other words, could you not have an
interceptor on a constructor pointcut that would do
Pope Paul V ordered Bellarmine to have the Sacred Congregation of the Index
decide on the Copernican theory. The cardinals of the Inquisition met on 24
February 1616 and took evidence from theological experts. They condemned the
teachings of Copernicus, and Bellarmine conveyed their decision to
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Andrew C. Oliver
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
Pope Paul V ordered Bellarmine to have the Sacred
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff
Haynie
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:07 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
Bill,
This is fabulous stuff. Good job.
JBoss Remoting
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Bill
Burke
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jeff
Haynie
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 11:51 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] AOP versioned ACID objects 1st iteration
JBoss Remoting is much more fabulous. We need to get the
On Wednesday, March 26, 2003, at 09:29 PM, Victor Langelo wrote:
Dain Sundstrom wrote:
After some email with Bill, it looks like we can use
Class.getDeclaredMethods to find which method the class implements
(you learn something new every day). It specifically excludes
inherited methods, so
Hi bill,
The versioning of POJO is very good. I have some issues here. If I
version a object, then I have to maintain all the state in the same POJO
which is not the general case and will bloat the code. The states are
maintained in the helper classes. Also defining each POJO as versioned is
Versioning --
Versioning can be done by Byte code manipulation. Instead of maintaining
the state as a proxy, you can maintain the state in a list in the
manipulated class.
Remoting --
has to be done through proxy, but abstract the user by the Inteceptor
sending the proxy based on the
Just a word of caution: the SUN server vm had a lot of stability issues
in the past, which was one of the reasons for BEA to use JRockit. I
stopped using the server vm because of frequent crashes under load as
well; this might have been fixed, however.
The -server setting has high thresholds
33 matches
Mail list logo
