Bugs item #742633, was opened at 2003-05-24 09:12
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by janb
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=742633&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
Subm
Let me see if I understand correctly:
In my web.xml I would put:
...
In my web containers proprietary descriptor file I would put:
...
So when I deploy, the container will match up the extra description
information in my proprietary descriptor with the
Not so much for deployment, but for development tools.
If the user, through some tool, deletes the servlet in the
main dd, then that tool can delete information related to
that servlet in the app-server-specific dd. Again, servlets
have names so this might not be the best example.
The id mechanis
The containers do not care about the ids. Some third party tool that is
generating an app server specific descriptor like jboss-web.xml could be
using the id as an index into the tool database when generating the
jboss-web.xml descriptor.
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Offic
All IIOP tests fail in the 4.0 branch. Does anybody know why?
I thought there were no IIOP changes in head since it was branched
off 3.x.
There are some IIOP fixes in 3.2 that need to be merged into head.
Following the usual "test before, test after" procedure, I run
the tests before doing it, o
Replying to my own message before anybody else spends time on this...
On Wed, 28 May 2003, Francisco Reverbel wrote:
> All IIOP tests fail in the 4.0 branch. Does anybody know why?
> I thought there were no IIOP changes in head since it was branched
> off 3.x.
This was the problem. There should
Sorry Francisco, this is my fault. I put the InvocationResponse stuff in.
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Francisco Reverbel
> Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 5:20 PM
> To: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] releasing on Sunday
They've been in jboss 4 for several months. How many of them are necessary
is another question.
david jencks
On 2003.05.27 21:56 Nathan Phelps wrote:
> Are these messages new? What do they mean? They are all over the place
> in JB4 and I don't recall seeing them before.
>
> 2003-05-27 20:45:2
On Tue, 20 May 2003 14:04:37 +0700, Jason Dillon wrote:
> And when will 1.6 be out? Using a development release of Ant is not going
> to fly.
Like most open source ... when it's ready :).
As a note there is a major re-write (the third I know of) of maven going
on at the moment.
-k.
--
If yo
Bugs item #745277, was opened at 2003-05-29 02:51
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=745277&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
P
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
tests-jsr77-unit:
[junit] Running org.jboss.test.management.test.J
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
JBoss daily test results
SUMMARY
Number of tests run: 1240
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss1.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Exception in thread "main" javax.naming.CommunicationException. Root
Hi Chris,
Why are the linux tests running against the "default"
instead of the "all" configuration?
Regards,
Adrian
Adrian Brock
Director of Support
Back Office
JBoss Group, LLC
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mai
14 matches
Mail list logo
