[JBoss-dev] [Tomcat] - Re: JBoss 3.2.3/Catalina 4.1.29 issue with multiple web cont

2004-03-12 Thread camel
This is happening because JBoss, by default, uses a shared repository for all classes loaded. You probably want to separate your webapps into their own classloaders. See this thread: http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=43462. You can search the forums for UseJBossWebLoader

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Error in building the latest code

2004-03-12 Thread hxp
Wondering how you're getting CVS to build at all This is from CVS checkout just minutes ago; I am doing a build in the builds directory first, and it dies even worse than yesterday: _default:compile-classes: [depend] Deleted 0 out of date files in 0 seconds [javac] Compiling

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Making nukes more userfriendly

2004-03-12 Thread Janoz
Our company wishes to use Nukes. The problem is that the admin side of the site is aimed at people that know a lot about internet and HTML, and out launching costumur doesn't have this knowledge. At this point we are changing the html module to a more userfriendly one. The problem is that it

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: MySql setup.ddl is broken

2004-03-12 Thread hxp
Now that 1.0 is out, it's time for a genuine fix to this problem. a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825340#3825340;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825340Reply to the post/a

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Making nukes more userfriendly

2004-03-12 Thread cooper
I plan to move the HTML module (and some other) out of the core. What kind of change do you want to do ? a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825348#3825348;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825348Reply

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Making nukes more userfriendly

2004-03-12 Thread Janoz
The first change we are making is using a wysiwyg editor. We're implementing [url=http://www.kevinroth.com/rte/demo.htm]rte[/url]. But more importantly nukes shouldn't ristrict te user to a certain editor. Maybe its possible to use some kind of template or something (because the code for a

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes 1.0

2004-03-12 Thread loweryr
Has anyone managed to get the source drop for 1.0.0 to compile under linux? I keep getting the following, (and I've tried the 1.0.0 released source, the snapshot, and head... I keep getting this: [xslt] : Fatal Error! java.lang.IllegalStateException: can't declare any more prefixes in

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Nukes CVS status

2004-03-12 Thread cooper
I created a branch for the release 1.0 (i.e branch from Nukes_1_0_0) and I merged the fixes done since 1.0. (mines and sherman's ones). That branch is only for bug fixes and will give us a 1.0.x releases with bug fixes. I removed the unused modules from that branch, that's why you need to

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Error in building the latest code

2004-03-12 Thread sgwood
You do not have JBOSS_HOME pointing to a JBoss 3.2.3 root directory. Sherman a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825384#3825384;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825384Reply to the post/a

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Initial state replication is not working! Please help!

2004-03-12 Thread michael.daleiden
michael.daleiden wrote : I have a request into our HP/UX admin to upgrade the HP/UX server to 1.4 (which will probably not occur until Monday or Tuesday of next week). Once this upgrade is complete, I'll run the tests again to verify my suspicions about Java 1.3 and the replication of booleans

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Making nukes more userfriendly

2004-03-12 Thread joehobson
I'd definitely agree that Nukes needs to be a bit more user friendly. But i do understand from my own developments in the past, that it's often more important to get the project up and running before worrying about ease of use and look feel. My own personal usablity issue is that when i login

[JBoss-dev] [JTA on JBoss] - Tyrex failed under heavy transaction load.

2004-03-12 Thread alexsong
Hi, there, We've tested tyrex transaction manager under havery transaction load situation, tyrex failed after a few hours running. Here are our settings: OS: SunOS 5.8 JBoss(jetty) 3.0.4 about 20 session beans, 15 massage driven beans, Oracle 8.1.7 tyrex-1.0.1 (timeout 5 min) It runs ok under

[JBoss-dev] [JTA on JBoss] - Re: Tyrex failed under heavy transaction load.

2004-03-12 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Even the tyrex developer doesn't recommed it for production, which is why we no longer support it. Regards, Adrian a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825412#3825412;View the original post/a a

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-915150 ] Patch for [ 558362 ] sfsb loses security on passivate

2004-03-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #915150, was opened at 2004-03-12 19:00 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=915150group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Installshield

2004-03-12 Thread noel.rocher
Sherman, Are you still working on it ? a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825415#3825415;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825415Reply to the post/a

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-915161 ] Load-balance policy can now be aware of their birth node

2004-03-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Change Notes item #915161, was opened at 2004-03-12 19:27 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=381174aid=915161group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Patches-915162 ] Patch for [ 637940 ] NamingService doesn't close context

2004-03-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Patches item #915162, was opened at 2004-03-12 19:28 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376687aid=915162group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: CVS HEAD Status: Open

[JBoss-dev] [JTA on JBoss] - Re: Tyrex failed under heavy transaction load.

2004-03-12 Thread alexsong
No wonder I couldn't find tyrex setting in jboss-service.xml in jboss 3.2.3. Do you know if jboss team has plan to implement more sophiaticate transaction manager after jboss 4? I read tyrex doc and src carefully, I found this guy did have very good view on how to implement TP monitoring,

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Making nukes more userfriendly

2004-03-12 Thread cooper
I am thinking of bringing the concept of plugin in the HTML module. A plugin would be responsible for editing, modifying, etc... a file in that module. Do you think that could bring flexibility ? a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825418#3825418;View the original

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Installshield

2004-03-12 Thread sgwood
Sorry, I have not been looking at it. Too much time helping my team ride the learning curve, Postgres, security, module packaging and JSPs. hxp has been pushing for using CMP auto table creation, which makes sense, but is not something I am familiar with. If we do go down that route, the

[JBoss-dev] [JTA on JBoss] - Re: Tyrex failed under heavy transaction load.

2004-03-12 Thread Bill Burke
tyrex does not have recovery/logging a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825422#3825422;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825422Reply to the post/a

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Interception of Superclass and Interfaces

2004-03-12 Thread alex_brasil
Hi, Is there any way of intercepting the methods of an interface implementation or to intercept a subclass of some declared superclass? For example: I have two classes, A and B, and B extends A. Is there any way of intercepting calls to an instance of B by declaring an interceptor to class A

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Interception of Superclass and Interfaces

2004-03-12 Thread Bill Burke
In DR2 you can do the following class A { public void method1() {..} } class B extends A {} method1 will be intercepted if you declare a methoind-pointcut on A.method1. DR3 has been improved tremoundously. You can do instanceof in the pointcut expression. DR3 will be out next Wednesday.

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - XDoclet missing

2004-03-12 Thread simonmeaden
Hi, I suspect that I am missing something here but I just downloaded JBossIDE (V1.2.2) through the upgrade wizard in Eclipse(3.0M6) but I cannot find XDoclet in the Windows-Preferences-JBossIDE page. Do I need to download anything else? simonmeaden a

[JBoss-dev] [Clusters on JBoss (Clusters/JBoss)] - Re: problem in hot deploy in clustred environment(ASAP)

2004-03-12 Thread mycindyart
It is a problem with relative path. You need set up a directory same level as deploy and under deploy, both named 'farm'. Here is a sample xml: ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8? !-- -- !-- Farming

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-848106 ] ClassCastException on SOAP calls upon redeployment

2004-03-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #848106, was opened at 2003-11-24 02:55 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by millz You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=848106group_id=22866 Category: JBossSOAP Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Works For Me

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-895672 ] ServiceBindingManager does not override Tomcat5 ports

2004-03-12 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #895672, was opened at 2004-02-12 04:28 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=895672group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Closed Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Interception of Superclass and Interfaces

2004-03-12 Thread alex_brasil
First of all, thanks for the fast answer. Bill Burke wrote : | In DR2 you can do the following | | class A | { |public void method1() {..} | } | | class B extends A {} | | method1 will be intercepted if you declare a methoind-pointcut on A.method1. | That I already

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Interception of Superclass and Interfaces

2004-03-12 Thread Bill Burke
Doco for DR3? Working on it right now. If you checkout CVS head cvs checkout jboss-head $ cd jboss-head/aop $ build dist You will get a zip dist. In the dist docs/examples directory there are a bunch of examples. I'll be adding to this and documenting each example as well as updating all

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Error in building the latest code

2004-03-12 Thread hxp
That was it -- thanks, Sherman! a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3825450#3825450;View the original post/a a href=http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3825450Reply to the post/a ---

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Latest JBossCache on head back ported to 3.2

2004-03-12 Thread bwang00
Hi, I have tried to send this notice through dev list but it does not seem to get through. Anyway, we are going to have a JBossCache release next week. And I am currently working on the docs. But I have also ported all the latest changes to 3.2, specifcally MBean service should be working

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.3.1_10) [AUTOMATED]

2004-03-12 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Nukes CVS status

2004-03-12 Thread hxp
Thanks, Julien, for giving us a stable branch. As of now, it won't build for the simple reason that build.xml is still configured for modules-most, and the required modules are missing. BUILD FAILED | file:/home/hxp/nukes/branch10/nukes-1.0/build/../tools/etc/buildfragments/targets.ent:690:

[JBoss-dev] Compilation Failed! JBoss (Branch_3_2/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-03-12 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 97 % ( 1782 / 1830 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-03-12 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 97 % ( 1790 / 1835 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-03-12 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 97 % ( 1779 / 1830 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-03-12 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Test Results: 97 % ( 1771 / 1823 ) - nearly there - who is gonna get us to 100%!. JBoss (HEAD/linux1/1.4.2_03) [AUTOMATED]

2004-03-12 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===