Thks for the reply,
But further I wanted to use it from IDE Eclipse Tool configuring for PostGresql
Database.
i dont want to go in doing R D on it.
If direct straight settings are provided than It could be of great help
THks a lot
mitdin
View the original post :
Hello, everybody!
I have checked out the source codes from CVS server, and in my Eclipse M8 I built them
successfully. But when I checked the generated
org.jboss.ide.eclipse_1.2.330.bin.dist.zip file, I found that there was only some
XML files in it, and the zip file's size is only about 20K. I
The changes have been commited. So far I have not been able to find a client allowing
me to test it. I have left it disabled in jboss-service.xml for now, so at least it
does not break anything.
The only client I found supporting TLS was Eudora, but once the CAPA command returns
STLS as one of
I have run with a .aop file embedded within a .sar file. Maybe it doesn't work for
embedded .ears. I'll have to get back to you.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830177#3830177
Reply to the post :
still plodding along on this... i think its coming along well, though. hope to commit
something in the not too distant future and have an impact on M1.
my notion of 'multi-system' was rather 'multi-subsystem' where in addition to
connecting as a client to the server on port 9000, it would also
Yeah I think we should have SSL as well as TLS. Of course I thought they were the
same thing doh.. It seemed logical at the time to divide thread pools by protocol
and port. Would it now be more logical to make thread pools a seperate concept to be
shared among port/protocol?
By default
Hi,
I need help in getting TransactionCurrent object in my application deloyed in JBoss. I
tried to get it from the 'jacorb' name service.
I am using the following code snippet.
org.omg.CORBA.ORB orb = org.jboss.iiop.CorbaORB.getInstance();
Its a great idea. For unit test environments I'd rather not run on standard ports.
The reasons should be obvious. Port 9000 is likely used by nothing, port 25 is likely
monitored by sendmail or something. If we run the unit tests on port 9000,
9001,9002,9004 we have a lot less pain. I
If I have understood you correctly, I think it makes sense for the protocol to depend
on the thread pools, rather than the thread pools depending on the protocol.
Maybe we could end up having just one server MBean, and define lists of secure and
non-secure ports for the protocol to listen on
Hum... Strange...
Your .xml file is really different than mine...
Here is mine :
| ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
| !DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans
2.0//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd;
|
| ejb-jar
|
|
Hi gang,
I feel we're ready for the release candidate with just a few small tasks to complete.
I'll work on tweaking the build to put out a distribution. I'm also working on
completing the docs for M1
(http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=MailServicesInstallingM1) and can use some help
here.
You'll probably need to sync up the directory names in the build scripts. The scripts
are set to false for javacFailOnError so a successful build can potentially be a bit
misleading.
cheers.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830194#3830194
Let's discuss what we want for M2:
1. Mail Lists. I'll head this up. Once we have this ready we can start using Mail
Services to run Marc's newsletter which should give us some good data on how well we
handle volume.
2. POP/SSL. Who wants this? It seems that we can't just do starttls.
3.
Hi, we have an existing struts application that ran fine under wls but I'm having some
issues with it running under jboss-3.2.2_tomcat-4.1.27. Here is the unique problem.
I have one jsp(submissionSummary.jsp) that is used by two action mappings(below are
the mappings). When the first
I'll look at POP/SSL and SMTP/SSL, probably makes sense since I'm pretty familiar with
it already. Just hope there aren't any hidden gotchas!
I'd love to look at the Nukes integration as well.
I'll flesh out the TLS bits of the M1 docs.
View the original post :
Let me recapture the code as the following;
| ?xml version=1.0 encoding=UTF-8?
| !DOCTYPE ejb-jar PUBLIC -//Sun Microsystems, Inc.//DTD Enterprise JavaBeans
2.0//EN http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd;
|
| ejb-jar
|
|description![CDATA[No Description.]]/description
|
Hi
I managed to run the Fibo example but only by making the lookup as
context.lookup(ejb/tutorial/Fibo);
For some reason
context.lookupLink(java:/comp/env/ejb/Fibo);
didn't work, it produced:
18:58:31,625 ERROR [Engine] StandardWrapperValve[ComputeServlet]: Allocate exception
for servlet
For nukes integration every forum should be subscribable essentially as a mail list.
meaning I should be able to send to tis forum at [EMAIL PROTECTED] and receive
messages.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830207#3830207
Reply to the post :
Yeah lets think of it around M3.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830206#3830206
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3830206
---
This SF.Net
Immediately after sending my mail I notice the error in my code: the lookup is
context.lookup(java:/comp/env/ejb/Fibo);
There's no mention of lookupLink in the Tutorial!
Risto
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830209#3830209
Reply to the post :
Andy wrote:
anonymous wrote : Mail Lists.
This are two parts, where one relies on the other, but is not necessarily needed:
1) alias expansion. Needed in any case, as users want mail to be stored locally and
forwarded to their GSM.
2) request processing: a piece of code, that enables user to send
For M2 list management should just be MBean based. It will definitely play into nukes
integration but I want to get the basics working first. My goal is to get this all
replacing JBoss infrastructure ASAP as that will give us a really high volume user
that will give us adequate bug reporting.
That's what I meant. Expanding aliases is basic stuff that needs to be present. List
management is the bonus.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830212#3830212
Reply to the post :
Sounds about right, I'm just scoping what we'll do for M2.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830214#3830214
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3830214
Hello,
I would like to know if any of you guys is planning to develop the jboss plugin for
xdoclet2. I would like to contribute to this project so let me know if any planning
has been already done.
Thanks,
Stephane
View the original post :
Not sure where you said this but you said you weren't sure that multiple messages were
delivered when two receipients were in the same domain (meaning andy at superlink and
acoliver at superlink). I said I'd test that. I tested it and it worked. Nice work
dude.
View the original post :
I didn't like the Post Nuke database naming conventions. When I did the downloads
module I did the module from the ground up using my own naming convetions ( which was
using downloadId instead of pn_id or somthing like that.) I am also redoing the polls
database and renaming all the fields like
There's another point to consider here as well.
Velocity is a well known templating system. You open the door to a sizeable crew of
Java developers by including it as an option within Nukes.
Also, the presentation layer aspect of Nukes is still a little esoteric. You can
consider this an
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
probably a good idea. in that case the 'test server' would deliver to a nonstandard
port in addition to receiving on a nonstandard port (9000, etc).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830244#3830244
Reply to the post :
i will also install it as my relay server in the short term, and some time later
follow suit with my primary.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830245#3830245
Reply to the post :
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Thanks a lot.
And I hope that an ear example with AOP would be in Jboss4.0 Final Release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830249#3830249
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3830249
Hi,
I was just wondering if there are any status updates for M8?
r
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=3830253#3830253
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=3830253
35 matches
Mail list logo
