[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: How does Nukes evalute statements like $ {config:siteNam

2004-04-19 Thread porterrickabaugh
Some data is kept in the nukes database. MySql users can use the following commands the to Site Name and Slogan. update nuke_services_attributes set pn_value = 'Your Web Portal' where pn_aid = 'SiteName'; update nuke_services_attributes set pn_value = 'Slogan' where pn_aid = 'Nukes on JBoss';

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938326 ] jgroups logging is too verbose

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938326, was opened at 2004-04-19 20:53 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by belaban You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938326&group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938296 ] beforeCompletion called on rollback()

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938296, was opened at 2004-04-20 01:57 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938296&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 >Status: Pending >Resolution: Accepted Priorit

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: New Asynchronous Aspect .

2004-04-19 Thread claudehussenet
Thx Bill for your fix in CVS. The Introduction Annotation is now working with the pre-compiler in addtion of the classloader option. Thx-Claude View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831515#3831515 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938326 ] jgroups logging is too verbose

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938326, was opened at 2004-04-20 03:53 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938326&group_id=22866 Category: Clustering Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938296 ] beforeCompletion called on rollback()

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938296, was opened at 2004-04-20 01:57 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938296&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 S

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.35 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419230246Lbuild.35 BUILD COMPLETE - build.35Date of build: 04/19/2004 23:02:46Time to build: 15 minutes 26 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 22:48:31Last log entry: Added for aop mbean testing  Unit

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: javax.naming.NamingException: Context is read only

2004-04-19 Thread bwang00
If you don't care about the tx, you can have the TransactionManagerLookupClass tag empty. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831509#3831509 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831509

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Question on error

2004-04-19 Thread bwang00
Just to let everyone knows that this bug has been fixed. Thanks, -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831508#3831508 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831508 -

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.34 Build Fixed

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419223828Lbuild.34 BUILD COMPLETE - build.34Date of build: 04/19/2004 22:38:28Time to build: 14 minutes 44 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 22:22:03Last log entry: Correct the modelmbean descriptor

[JBoss-dev] [Caches on JBoss (Caches/JBoss)] - Re: Using TreeCacheAop inside Jboss via MBean

2004-04-19 Thread bwang00
Hi, I have finally got around to fix this bug. I have also created a unit test case under test/cache/test/aop/MBeanUnitTestCase to test cache aop running as a MBean service. We will plan to deliver a patch release soon. -Ben View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o

Re: [JBoss-dev] Why the two jboss logging frameworks?

2004-04-19 Thread Adrian Brock
I've fixed most of the testsuite, there are still two modelmbean failures I don't understand. The descriptor validation part of the spec is voodoo to me. build test-compliance-JBossMX Also, I fixed some of the tests to catch the RuntimeOperationsException thrown by Descriptor.isValid() But the JM

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419220723 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build: 04/19/2004 22:07:23Time to build: 11 minutes 4 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 21:38:06Last log

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938296 ] beforeCompletion called on rollback()

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938296, was opened at 2004-04-20 11:57 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938296&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Non

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419213345 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build: 04/19/2004 21:33:45Time to build: 12 minutes 58 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 20:59:36Last lo

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419205031 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build: 04/19/2004 20:50:31Time to build: 12 minutes 54 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 20:43:42Last lo

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.33 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419200459Lbuild.33 BUILD COMPLETE - build.33Date of build: 04/19/2004 20:04:59Time to build: 15 minutes 11 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 19:47:08Last log entry: You cannot reference the outer mbean during construction

[JBoss-dev] JBoss Shutdown Failed! JBoss (HEAD/winxp/1.4.1_06) [AUTOMATED]

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
=== ==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS== ===

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: M1RC1 release available

2004-04-19 Thread mikea-xoba
btw, it goes without saying that if we adopt the verbose-numbered-tagging scheme i just described, then right before one starts the commit/merge procedure, one would have to do a 'cvs log' to see what the next tag-sequence-number would be. and since cvs lacks atomicity across multiple command-li

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: M1RC1 release available

2004-04-19 Thread mikea-xoba
for instance, i just modified the file BUILDING.txt in the HEAD of jboss-mail. so i guess i would do the following (which i'll do on the command-line as i write): [note: i realized after doing this that in general, we'll usually want to merge from M1 to HEAD instead, since i guess no new feature

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.32 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419193557Lbuild.32 BUILD COMPLETE - build.32Date of build: 04/19/2004 19:35:57Time to build: 13 minutes 31 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 19:28:03Last log entry: Make the MBeanRegistry instantiation errors more reveali

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: MailServicesPatches Wiki Fubar

2004-04-19 Thread spiritualmechanic
Now after taking the content that was before, the preview messes up. Very strange behavior. Is there a special character in here that Wiki is barfing on? It may not like the diff -u > Old content below, according to Wiki version: Getting R/W access to the JBoss repository requires demonstration

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - MailServicesPatches Wiki Fubar

2004-04-19 Thread spiritualmechanic
Well, obviously I need to read more howto on Wiki. I'm not sure what I did, but I royally fucked up the MailServicesPatches page. I attached a .zip, then I tried to follow the syntax for linking it correctly, and something went weird. Is there a way to undo it? Some days. I shoulda just waited

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.31 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419175147Lbuild.31 BUILD COMPLETE - build.31Date of build: 04/19/2004 17:51:47Time to build: 27 minutes 43 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 17:38:42Last log entry: bug with annotated introductions. regression test added

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Unbound classpath container org.eclipse.jdt.USER_LIBRARY

2004-04-19 Thread mikea-xoba
that's my bad --- should have documented it in file 'BUILDING.txt'. will do so right after posting this note. i added a user library called 'JBOSS_LIBS' a while back which should be instantiated by each eclipse end-user locally. this library should include all the jboss jars (in $JBOSS_HOME) wh

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.30 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419170954Lbuild.30 BUILD COMPLETE - build.30Date of build: 04/19/2004 17:09:54Time to build: 16 minutes 14 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 16:58:03Last log entry: Port improved logging and pool flush fix from 3.2

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-912096 ] Deployment Scanning Problem

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #912096, was opened at 2004-03-08 17:18 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=912096&group_id=22866 Category: Build System Group: v3.2 Status: Open >Resolution: Later Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938010 ] ManagedConnectionPool flush / Lost connections

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938010, was opened at 2004-04-19 16:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938010&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - Re: Change Notes: 3.2.4

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Workaround: Use a SynchronizedBoolean rather than a volatile for the shutdown state, some VMs do not implement volatile correctly. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831484#3831484 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - Re: Change Notes: 3.2.4

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Fix: Shutdown the flushed/discarded internal managed connection pool, otherwise the pool filler could refill it with connections that are unreachable - a connection leak View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831483#3831483 Reply to the post : ht

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - Re: Change Notes: 3.2.4

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add additional TRACE logging to the pooling View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831482#3831482 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831482 --- T

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Interested in translating Nukes in italian

2004-04-19 Thread adellechiaie
ok, I'll try to take a look at the sources to see if I'm able to understand something... Let me know when will be some news... Ciao Andrea View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831479#3831479 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: Unbound classpath container org.eclipse.jdt.USER_LIBRARY

2004-04-19 Thread kabkhan
AFAIK the .classpath and .project files used by eclipse are kind of just meant to be guidelines (since for almost everything I've looked at in JBoss I've needed to make some minor modifications). If I have understood you correctly, you should open the jbmail project properties in Eclipse and se

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938010 ] ManagedConnectionPool flush / Lost connections

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938010, was opened at 2004-04-19 16:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938010&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Subm

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: Interested in translating Nukes in italian

2004-04-19 Thread cooper
First we should separate and clean all the english files. A lot of module are using other modules translations which is a problem. Could you first work on that, then when it's clean it will be easier to translate (clean and clean separation) View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.h

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-932326 ] JBossMQ client crash when running from java applet

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #932326, was opened at 2004-04-09 14:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jurna You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=932326&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Remind Priority: 5 Su

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Unbound classpath container org.eclipse.jdt.USER_LIBRARY/JBO

2004-04-19 Thread mrooney
The Eclipse .classpath (1.2) in the sourceforge jboss-mail project fails to build due to an "Unbound classpath container" error on org.eclipse.jdt.USER_LIBRARY/JBOSS_LIBS. I'm using Eclipse 2.1.3 with JBoss IDE 1.2.3. I can't find where a classpath container can be defined in Eclipse. The Eclips

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-936962 ] XDoclet access to /resources/additional_values.xml

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #936962, was opened at 2004-04-17 15:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by folkerts You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=936962&group_id=22866 Category: JBoss-IDE Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938010 ] ManagedConnectionPool flush / Lost connections

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938010, was opened at 2004-04-19 16:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938010&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Subm

[JBoss-dev] [Tomcat] - Re: Integration of Tomcat 5.0.16 with Jboss 2.4.7

2004-04-19 Thread smaram1
Finally we went ahead with Jboss 3.2.2 and Tomcat 4.1.27. We had to change the base MBean framework calls, JDO diaster, (had to fix this by changing the source code) Some classes were missing(TracePriority, AutoDeployer, log4j issues), jars were not present or shuffled around. It was pretty he

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Interested in translating Nukes in italian

2004-04-19 Thread adellechiaie
Hi guys, I played around with nukes 1.0 for a little while, and I think that it's very interesting and nice. If you are interested, I would like to collaborate with you in translating nukes in italian language. Let me know... Andrea View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modu

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.29 Build Fixed

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419121051Lbuild.29 BUILD COMPLETE - build.29Date of build: 04/19/2004 12:10:51Time to build: 22 minutes 39 seconds  Unit Tests: (0)No Tests Run

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Remote deployment

2004-04-19 Thread avion
Is there a way to deploy to a remote server from the IDE? I know I can use ssh to copy the files over but it would be nice to (1) be able to automate the process from the IDE and (2) not have to either give everyone a login on the remote server or run there an ftp server. Avi View the origina

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-938010 ] ManagedConnectionPool flush / Lost connections

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #938010, was opened at 2004-04-19 16:13 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938010&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCX Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: Non

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-937974 ] Problem reading foreign-key datasource

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #937974, was opened at 2004-04-19 18:40 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=937974&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP >Group: v3.2 Status: Open >Resolution: Accepted Prio

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419110857 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build: 04/19/2004 11:08:57Time to build: 20 minutes 25 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 11:02:48Last lo

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-921078 ] URLDirectoryScanner and URLs pointing to exploded WAR

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #921078, was opened at 2004-03-22 15:39 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=921078&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Prior

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-921061 ] URLDeploymentScanner doesn't like exploded war files

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #921061, was opened at 2004-03-22 15:23 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=921061&group_id=22866 Category: JBossServer Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Invalid Prior

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-937974 ] Problem reading foreign-key datasource

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #937974, was opened at 2004-04-19 11:40 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=937974&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: None Status: Open Resolution: No

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-935891 ] mdb-* tags not described in jboss*.dtd

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #935891, was opened at 2004-04-15 20:02 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=935891&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ >Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority:

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: JBoss Deployment

2004-04-19 Thread stanley1610
Hi all, I uploaded my code in Zip format at http://hk.geocities.com/stanley1610/JBossTutorial.zip Let us share and study together. Thanks for your help. -stan View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831429#3831429 Reply to the post : http://www.jb

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-932326 ] JBossMQ client crash when running from java applet

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #932326, was opened at 2004-04-09 14:38 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=932326&group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open >Resolution: Remind Priority: 5 S

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Fluid AOP

2004-04-19 Thread Bill Burke
I've been thinking about this over the weekend, and what I think I"m going to add is the expansion of CFLOW. Currently CFLOW only looks at the Java call stack. I think I will expand it to look at our metadata chain, or configuration domains. http://jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=AnnotationsAndAn

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-935643 ] ConcurrentModificationException in TransactionImpl

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #935643, was opened at 2004-04-15 14:13 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=935643&group_id=22866 Category: JBossTX >Group: v3.2 >Status: Closed >Resolution: Fixed Priority:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.28 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419101032Lbuild.28 BUILD COMPLETE - build.28Date of build: 04/19/2004 10:10:32Time to build: 18 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 09:49:20Last log entry: Correctly synchronize the threads associated with the tr

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.27 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419093125Lbuild.27 BUILD COMPLETE - build.27Date of build: 04/19/2004 09:31:25Time to build: 19 minutes 14 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 08:58:18Last log entry: DTD fixes together with corresponding fixes to example c

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-907285 ] setting unpackWars as false didn't work

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #907285, was opened at 2004-03-01 10:27 Message generated for change (Comment added) made by raja05 You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=907285&group_id=22866 Category: JBossWeb Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: None Priority: 5 Su

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: M1RC1 release available

2004-04-19 Thread pilhuhn
Actually, new devel goes in HEAD, fixes in M1 branch. When the branch is ok, one sets a tag on the branch and merges TAG-Brachning point into HEAD. New fixes on Branch can then be identified being relative to the TAG. This process can go on as one wishes. View the original post : http://www.jbo

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: FakeInitialContext and java:/ root names

2004-04-19 Thread kabkhan
PS I could only get the NamingService to work "in-jvm", setting the ports to > 0 caused whole bunch of other problems. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831398#3831398 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: FakeInitialContext and java:/ root names

2004-04-19 Thread kabkhan
I have commited the changes to the head branch, so that the mail services tests now use the normal jboss naming service. Using Adrian's suggestion Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().getResources("jndi.properties"); uncovered that java.naming.provider.url is present in twiddle.jar.

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.26 Build Successful

2004-04-19 Thread kimptoc_mail
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040419083623Lbuild.26 BUILD COMPLETE - build.26Date of build: 04/19/2004 08:36:23Time to build: 23 minutes 36 secondsLast changed: 04/19/2004 08:22:08Last log entry: Fix the dtd  Unit Tests: (0)

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: M1RC1 release available

2004-04-19 Thread kabkhan
My understanding is new stuff goes into HEAD, and fixes for M1 go into both M1 branch and HEAD. I agree it would be nice if it something was put in place to merge M1 branch changes into HEAD View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831392#3831392 Rep

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - Re: Change Notes: 3.2.4

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bug Fix: DTD fixes to , and which take no text node and corresponding fixes to the example configs. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831390#3831390 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831390

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: M1RC1 release available

2004-04-19 Thread mikea-xoba
here's a few comments & questions to help me get some clarification on our branching strategy --- if we do repeated merges between branch and head we'll potentially run into cvs-conflicts since any secondary merges will try to re-merge stuff from prior merges. so i think we either have to use a

[JBoss-dev] [JMX on JBoss (JBoss/JMX)] - XMLOutputter / Applet - Web Console

2004-04-19 Thread MarcMA
Hi All. Regarding JBoss 3.2.4RC1: There is a messy little exception thrown by the jmx-console web-app keeping you off using the jmx stuff properly. The XMLOutputter cannot be found during the compilation of the inspectMBean. Is this due some major changes? A workaround is to place the old jdom.

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Interceptors

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Need to add interceptors to the implementation to allow behaviour to be more easily introduced by users/integrators. This would also simply much of the code which is fairly monolithic. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831364#3831364 Reply to the

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: RAR metadata repository

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Implement a RAR metadata repository. This would be useful for deployment tools and where a connection-definition or message-listener is unique across all deployments would negate the need to explicity identity the rar-name in deployments. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Debugging features

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Transaction and Message Inflow are dangerous operations. You are pretty much acting as a container developer. Need to implement debug features to help RAR developers find problems. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831360#3831360 Reply to the pos

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Improve management

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
There are many areas in JBossJCA where information is not exposed for management. This needs to be improved. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831363#3831363 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Transaction Inflow XID

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think we should use the provided XID when enlisting the resources in the transaction. Currently we use the JBoss local id. Maybe it should be configurable? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831361#3831361 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.or

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Timers

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current implementation of createTimer() just creates new java.util.Timer objects. This needs to be improved View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831359#3831359 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Bootstrap Context

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Allow for more flexible configuration of the BootstrapContext e.g. a ResourceAdapter wants its own WorkManager View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831357#3831357 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Message Inflow QOS

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add Quality Of Service to message inflow e.g. Defining delivery side pooling when not using the WorkManager View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831355#3831355 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Generic Message Inflow

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It should be a trivial implementation to let Message Inflow target an MBean rather than just an EJB. This may have to wait for the interceptor unification project View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831354#3831354 Reply to the post : http://www.jbo

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: ConnectionDefinitionDeployer - replace XSLSubDeployer

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Replace the use of the XSLSubDeployer with a proper deloyer that takes -ds.xml files and creates a meta data object like the RAR deployer. There should be an option to create ConnectionFactories/DataSources by passing the meta data object on a JMX operation. Rename the class to ConnectionDefiniti

[JBoss-dev] [JCA on JBoss] - TODO: Message Inflow JmsRA

2004-04-19 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add message inflow to the JMS Resource Adapter View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831351#3831351 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831351 --

[JBoss-dev] [EJB on JBoss] - multiple 1-* CMR TransactionRolledbackLocalException NoSuchO

2004-04-19 Thread limatik
Hi, I am using JBOSS 3.2.2, RH9 and Postgresql as db. I have multiple 1-* CMRs on a single EJB (on this case, AccountEJB has 1-* relationships with 5 different EJBs). In the accountsessionejb I have the following code: public Map getAllAccount() throws NotFoundException { Collection cAcc

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-937767 ] left-join descriptor is problematic

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #937767, was opened at 2004-04-19 04:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=937767&group_id=22866 Category: JBossCMP Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution: No

[JBoss-dev] [Deployers on JBoss (Deployers/JBoss)] - call backs to hot deployment of -ds.xml

2004-04-19 Thread tsrmohan
Hi, I have the following scenario: A method in a bean modifies a -ds.xml and writes it back so that -ds.xml gets hot deployed. My problem is : I would like to stop clients from looking up for any DataSource present in the -ds.xml file.(Probably give them a message that DataSource is being depl

[JBoss-dev] [JBoss IDE] - Re: XDoclets in Version 1.2.230 does not work with eclipse 3

2004-04-19 Thread mlehradt
There were no resource files in eclipse\workspace\.metadata\.plugins\org.jboss.ide.eclipse.xdoclet.assist. I tried to copy them from a eclipse 2.1 installation. Now the templates are displayed, but code generation still does not work :/ View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.htm

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: FakeInitialContext and java:/ root names

2004-04-19 Thread kabkhan
I've been very naughty and have done a cross post regarding the jndi properties in order to reach a wider audience. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3830929#3830929 Adrian has some comments regarding how we set up our MBeans, Andy what do you think? View the original pos

[JBoss-dev] [Mail Services] - Re: TODO: (post M1)

2004-04-19 Thread kabkhan
Yes, still trying to figure out the jndi stuff. I've kind of hit a brick wall though, so it might be a while before I get it sorted. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831334#3831334 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-936962 ] XDoclet access to /resources/additional_values.xml

2004-04-19 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #936962, was opened at 2004-04-17 17:02 Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by letiemble You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=936962&group_id=22866 Category: JBoss-IDE Group: None Status: Open Resolution: None Priorit