Patches item #940529, was opened at 2004-04-23 08:44
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=940529&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSX
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Tom,
Can you give us a comparison matrix between your product and Mandarax
http://mandarax.sourceforge.net/
Thanks,
Ivelin
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832032#3832032
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posti
Hi all,
I was trying the Fibo example in JBOSSIDE 1.2.330. Everything ok until I tried to
deploy using the deployer menu (right-click on the ear file) Deployment/deploy To..
The following exception occurred:
Server returned HTTP response code: 500 for url:
and in the jboss console the foll
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log2004044623Lbuild.48
BUILD COMPLETE - build.48Date of build: 04/22/2004 22:46:23Time to build: 12 minutes 12 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 22:32:43Last log entry: But jboss.net back in the build but don't deploy it.The
Bugs item #938326, was opened at 2004-04-20 03:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938326&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priority
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log2004041028
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 22:10:28Time to build: 11 minutes 11 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 21:45:16Last log e
begin
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832023#3832023
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832023
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: The
In addition to this, I'd also like to construct a list of necessary unit tests that a
RAR developer should execute that would double-check all the connection counts,
connection creates, connection closes, etc.
I can add XA and Message unit tests as well, once I being to understand everything
un
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422212100
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 21:21:00Time to build: 10 minutes 4 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 21:01:55Last log en
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422201159
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build: 04/22/2004 20:11:59Time to build: 9 minutes 28 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 19:37:39Last log
Bugs item #938326, was opened at 2004-04-19 20:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by belaban
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938326&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: Postponed
Priori
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422191313
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 19:13:13Time to build: 17 minutes 2 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 18:57:47Last log en
Bugs item #938326, was opened at 2004-04-20 03:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by ejort
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938326&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
>Status: Open
>Resolution: Postponed
Priori
Bugs item #938326, was opened at 2004-04-19 20:53
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by belaban
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=938326&group_id=22866
Category: Clustering
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority
I found a solution to my problem. I am not sure if it is a hack but it seems
reasonible. I created my own login so I could capture the userId and password and
store them in the session. I then post a request to j_security_check for the
container security.
I then use a filter to intercept eve
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422180834
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 18:08:34Time to build: 13 minutes 31 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 17:20:41Last log e
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I didn't realize there was a thread on the tutorial. I have posted this request in
another thread but received no response, maybe somone who worked the Fibo tutorial can
help me.
Basically, Eclipse is reporting a fatal error for the first line in the index.html
file per page 24 of the tutorial:
Bugs item #940379, was opened at 2004-04-22 17:18
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=940379&group_id=22866
Category: JBossMQ
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: Non
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422171155
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 17:11:55Time to build: 19 minutes 47 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 17:02:51Last log e
+1
I'm just learning Hibernate myself at work, and it ROCKS.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832007#3832007
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832007
---
that would be appreciable, first thing is to clean the files to avoid cross-references
(like the module user should not use items from module core, etc)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832005#3832005
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.or
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422162337
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 16:23:37Time to build: 17 minutes 54 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 15:49:17Last log e
I want to take a look at Hibernate, but rather than knocking up a load of throw-away
examples, would a Hibernate mailbox implementation be useful for us?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832001#3832001
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/i
Yes that's correct.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832000#3832000
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832000
---
This SF.net email is spo
The cloning only makes to sense to me in the exceptional circumsatances.
1) The invocation wants to change its own behaviour (it would then clone
its data - e.g. the interceptors)
2) Somebody wants to reconfigure the context, it would then clone and reconfigure,
allowing in flight invocations to u
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422153105
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 15:31:05Time to build: 21 minutes 17 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 15:24:31Last log e
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422140948
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 14:09:48Time to build: 12 minutes 36 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 13:44:22Last log e
OK commited to head.
Also fixed an annoying issue where if you send a message with a null body
transport.sendMessage() threw a NullPointerException. This has been commited to both
head and M1 branch.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831993#383
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote :
| I don't like the idea of cloning the dispatcher on every request.
|
Right, but you have to either copy or synchronize anything that might be mutated by
the thread that's on the context. If there's any state in the dispatcher or you want
to keep the dispatcher
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I think Alex's fix make sense, especially since we will be reimplementing the
jmx invocation to look like the aop invocation when we do the interceptor unification.
What does it mean to have arguments associated with an invocation context
(i.e. a call path) instead of with an invocation?
I don't
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422125241Lbuild.47
BUILD COMPLETE - build.47Date of build: 04/22/2004 12:52:41Time to build: 17 minutes 37 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 12:01:31Last log entry: Fix the eclipse build
Unit Tests
OK, guys, I see that some of us out there is trying to do the translation.
Let's try not to do the same work five times, someone could give me some
informations???
I think that Janoz is in the more advanced phase, could you give some directions???
Thank's in advance
Andrea
View the original post
Could I suggest adding two columns to the "Modules" table on the main project page,
one for the status of the module within the stable version and one for the status of
the module within the CVS snapshot. This would help with issues like the buggy
"Sections" module in CVS where the current reco
I'll try and get something up today, both a general overview and something specific
for FAQ.
Sherman
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831978#3831978
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=383197
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422115602Lbuild.46
BUILD COMPLETE - build.46Date of build: 04/22/2004 11:56:02Time to build: 19 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 11:21:26Last log entry: Port finally fixes from 3.2
Unit
Could you say to me when you will put something on the wiki?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831973#3831973
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831973
sorry for whipping up a scare, folks :-)
am a big proponent of KISS too ('Keep It Simple Stupid') which i can agree is what
reasonably applies here.
we always have the option of refering back to this post should the full-fledged
procedures ever be needed.
mike
View the original post :
http
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422102751Lbuild.45
BUILD COMPLETE - build.45Date of build: 04/22/2004 10:27:51Time to build: 30 minutes 8 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 09:44:29Last log entry: Use the wsdl4j in apache.axis
Uni
The JCA 1.5 ra.xml contains admin objects.
These are javabeans that can be used to configure objects associated with
the resource adapter, e.g. a queue or connection factory in jms.
We should add a mechanism where these javabeans can be configured
from entries in jboss.xml or -ds.xml
e.g.
|
We need to merge the two different implementations of jca in the 3.2.x and jboss4
series.
The spec does allow a JCA1.5 implementation in a j2ee1.3 server
The key part are the changes to the transaction manager.
These need properly stress testing before they are applied to jboss-3.2.x
1) Last Resou
Hi I have similar problem but with Oracle9i
if u use the Oracle-xa-ds.xml and configure the jboss-service.xml to set the pad
attribute i get the following error
can some one tell me whats the issue with it. I have copied the Oracle-xa-ds.xml file
to deploy directory moreover i have changed the
just commit to head if its not for M1. If it is for M1 commit it both places.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831941#3831941
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831941
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.management
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831942#3831942
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831942
---
Th
I think you're making this harder than it is. We don't want to start up everything,
but don't go too far with it either.
Forget the relay server for now, just write a simple mail listener that puts it in the
strings for your unit test and test that what you expect gets to the mail listener.
I'm having the same problem trying to locate a resource bundle in my package name
space. Did you ever find a solution to this problem?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831937#3831937
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb
Wow Mike. I'm sure one day we'll need to do all of that. However, for now. We have
3-5 guys working on pretty short lived releases and branches. Thus I think the
simplest thing that works is probably best. For now lets just do this.
Branches happen along releases (M1RC1, RC2, M1FINAL all on
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422081943
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: -122Date of build: 04/22/2004 08:19:43Time to build: 19 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 07:51:42Last lo
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Ah ha! I got a super-basic server up and running. I took out all the JBossMQ stuff.
I think (and I may be wrong) that I want to try to get a minimal relay server going.
This should require:
1. Mail Service (JavaMail client stuff)
2. The JCA Mail
3. Some of the mail stuff.
4. I'm not sure if we'd
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
Patches item #939978, was opened at 2004-04-22 14:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=939978&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution:
Yeah it's probably not *real* hard, but there definitely is a learning curve between
trusting run.bat and bootstrapping your own. But this is stuff I've always wanted to
learn.
If Andy thinks uploading the path is okay, that'd be fine with me. I don't want anyone
to make a special excuse for me
Can you please make sure that you apply fixes and changes
to both the 3.2 and head branch.
This will avoid fixes getting lost, and also means I don't have to waste a whole
Sunday (like I did back in February) trying to merge fixes between the two branches.
Also, can you keep the change notes up-t
Bug Fix and Performance improvement:
Fix race condition in createPersistentTx(), where the long ID was being
incremented without a lock.
Improve concurrency of SpyXAResourceManager
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831918#3831918
Reply to the po
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422063203
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 06:32:03Time to build: 16 minutes 1 second
Unit Tests: (0)
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
===
==THIS IS AN AUTOMATED EMAIL - SEE http://jboss.kimptoc.net/ FOR DETAILS==
===
I have just retrieved the latest JBoss IDE source from CVS (The eclipse-3-0 branch).
I have imported all of the projects into Eclipse 3.0M8 and I have executed 'Create ANT
Build File'.
Using Eclipse I execute the 'build.update.jar' target, this appears to complete
without any problems.
Using E
View results here -> http://tck2.jboss.com/cc/?log=log20040422053314
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/build/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:55: exec returned: 1Date of build: 04/22/2004 05:33:14Time to build: 12 minutes 5 secondsLast changed: 04/22/2004 05:22:12Last log en
what time release jboss3.2.4?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831884#3831884
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831884
---
This SF.Net ema
Ok !
Thanks !
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831880#3831880
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831880
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored
Hi,
I have downloaded the Jboss3.2.3 and i am facin problems in installing it
So,I request you to help me in installing this.
Bye,
Rahul.Ch
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831878#3831878
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.
Problem solved !
I had to compile again my source...
(build deploy-components then build deploy)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831877#3831877
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831877
I have modified the code for SMTPSender so that it sends to all addresses for a given
domain in one SMTP connection. To acheive this I changed the implementation of the
method:
SMTPResult send(Mail message, MailAddress[] exclude)
RemoteDeliveryMDB now passes in the Mail and passes in all local
anonymous wrote : So anyways, I'm starting to set up my unit tests. It looks like in
the current tests a small JMX server is created, then the Mail MBeans are attached,
and then you start testing.
Yep, and MBeans the MailServices depend on are defined in depends-service.xml.
If you like I coul
The copy() method of the invocation context looks broken,
per invocation, a new copy of the context is added. This however is not correctly
copying the mutable objects, in this case the dispatcher.
Others that should be passed by copy to the incoming thread are the descriptor, and
possibly the
Hi, IDE-Developers,
thanks for the release - keep up the good work!!!
Best Regards
Jan Prill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831853#3831853
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3831853
--
There are problems with the current implementation. The dispatcher must not own args
but the invocation should. The problem is that dispatcher is not thread-safe and
concurrent threads override each other's parameters.
The consequences are:
- different threads associated with the same transactio
72 matches
Mail list logo
