Bugs item #1006723, was opened at 2004-08-10 18:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by jcuen
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1006723&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Closed
Resolution: Fixed
Priority:
Eclipse 3.0.1 on notebook running XP Home and JDK 1.4.2_05
JBoss-IDE 1.3.30
JBoss 4.0.0 on desktop PC running XP Pro and JDK 1.4.2_05
I am trying to run Fibo tutorial. I can get all the way to deploying. When I try to
start JBoss installed on a different PC on a home local network, I get the m
See here:
http://jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=54897
Congrats to Marshall for putting together such great integration in such a short
period of time. Let's try and help him find some problems before the 1.0 release this
month of JBoss AOP!
Especially look at the tutorial. Ni
I'm very excited to announce the initial release (0.9) of the AOP extension to
JBossIDE. I look forward to everyone's feedback! =)
Installation Instructions | Tutorial | Sourceforge files
JBossIDE/AOP Release Notes
0.9
---
This is the initial release of the AOP extension to JBossIDE. This rele
I'm plannig to develop a web-console-plugin for administrators which includes:
deployment
list deployed modules
deploy/redeploy/undeploy module(with a help of URLDeploymentScanner)
datasource
list deployed datasources
create/edit datasource in -ds.xml
log4j
create/edit appender/category in log4j
Ok, I won't. But give me couple more days though.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850346#3850346
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850346
-
IMO, if you are running under JBoss, then MBean makes sense. Yes, they will share the
same cache instance.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850345#3850345
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041004155517Lbuild.263
BUILD COMPLETE - build.263Date of build: 10/04/2004 15:55:17Time to build: 30 minutes 15 secondsLast changed: 10/04/2004 15:50:04Last log entry: Got rid of references
Bugs item #1040077, was opened at 2004-10-04 14:54
Message generated for change (Settings changed) made by rhammer
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1040077&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
>Prio
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041004171304
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: -113Date of build: 10/04/2004 17:13:04Time to build: 16 minutes 22 secondsLast changed: 1
Bugs item #1040204, was opened at 2004-10-04 23:05
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1040204&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolutio
Bugs item #1039881, was opened at 2004-10-04 13:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1039881&group_id=22866
Category: JBossSOAP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1040200, was opened at 2004-10-04 16:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1040200&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution:
Bugs item #1037044, was opened at 2004-09-29 17:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1037044&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority
Bugs item #1037044, was opened at 2004-09-29 17:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1037044&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Pri
Bugs item #1038708, was opened at 2004-10-01 20:44
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by tdiesler
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1038708&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v4.0
>Status: Closed
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
i believe their performance pack include native codes (platform specific) around the
socket layer instead of using java socket.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850327#3850327
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=p
Bugs item #1037044, was opened at 2004-09-29 14:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by corby
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1037044&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
S
It seems that the technical reason is, that the number of parameters in the SEI method
call does not match the number of wsdl operation params.
Take a look at the samples.zip, all samples should work. Are you using
document/literal instead of rpc/literal?
View the original post :
http://www.jb
i had some problems with web services in 4.0 as well. i used the wsdl2java pluing
from myspotter.com. jboss seems to be missing an axis config file?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1038708&group_id=22866&atid=376685
-ks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/i
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041004152910Lbuild.48
BUILD COMPLETE - build.48Date of build: 10/04/2004 15:29:10Time to build: 16 minutes 55 secondsLast changed: 10/04/2004 12:31:35Last log entry: remove redundant newlines
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041004150054Lbuild.93
BUILD COMPLETE - build.93Date of build: 10/04/2004 15:00:54Time to build: 14 minutes 59 secondsLast changed: 10/04/2004 12:32:00Last log entry: remove redundant newlines
Hello,
I'm receiving the following in my initial run of JBoss 4.0.0. Any ideas? Do I
need to set something up for the 'configured listener host?' Rights issue somewhere?
I'm running SDK 1.4.2_05 on Linux Mandrake 10.0 (x586)
I'd appreciate any help or suggestions. Thanks.
11:56:08,47
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041004141448Lbuild.262
BUILD COMPLETE - build.262Date of build: 10/04/2004 14:14:48Time to build: 28 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 10/04/2004 13:31:31Last log entry: references to JAXP rem
Bugs item #1040077, was opened at 2004-10-04 10:54
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1040077&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Postponed
4.0 final
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850316#3850316
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850316
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Bugs item #1040077, was opened at 2004-10-04 14:54
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1040077&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolutio
Adrian,
I submitted a patch on Friday that will allow, with an optional configuration setting,
scheduled messages to be received with a selector.
I know that you are extremely busy, and as such understand that it will take a bit to
get to. However, I am trying to decide if such a change will be
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041004122616Lbuild.47
BUILD COMPLETE - build.47Date of build: 10/04/2004 12:26:16Time to build: 44 minutes 14 secondsLast changed: 10/04/2004 03:33:34Last log entry: ported fix for bug '[ 100
I've been searching the forums for this particular use-case. Please let me know if
this is possible or if this is the inherent bahaviour of JBossCache.
I'm a creating a web service using a Session Bean (using JBoss.NET). The session bean
will have access to a TreeCacheAOP (btw: this is not JBoss
The docs for 3.0 still state that try ... finally is not supported. Is this true? I
would very much like to use Javassist for a particular application, but being able to
use a finally clause is critical.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850305
A 3.2.6RC2 release was put out due to some testsuite failures that could not be
resolved. There are security related failures in a number of tests that only happen
when running the full testsuite. Individually the tests work fine but the overall
testsuite run must work as well. The current targe
I personally find number of objects and delta between two measurement points very
handy. Humans can better cope with lower numbers :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850296#3850296
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
good to hear about that. where is the state of your work ? I saw you both commited to
head and 1.1, can you report about it please ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850294#3850294
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o
To close out this thread, it turned out to be a bug in XDoclet (I've submitted a
patch), so there's no further action needed by the Nukes team.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850292#3850292
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?
what version of jboss?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850289#3850289
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850289
---
This SF.net email is s
The standard security properties mechanism for replacing a default system Policy is
defined in section 2.1 of the jacc spec and entails modification of the vm security
properties file. Section 2.7 describes how a the policy should be replaced when the
javax.security.jacc.auth.policy.provider sys
Bugs item #1037044, was opened at 2004-09-29 14:58
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by corby
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1037044&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority: 5
S
"bwang00" wrote : I will need to take a look myself to see why.
|
| -Ben
Looking forward to hearing back! Please don't forget about me Ben :)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850284#3850284
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.ht
that is not very clear for me :-),
seriously if you want another display scheme, *just* develop a new ParserStack
different from this one. The parser stack framework has been designated for that
purpose. So you will not touch the current one and develop a new one that fit your
needs. Then make
Which do you feel is better, doing the: BBCode -> HTML. Wiki -> HTML, and HTML
cleaning or removing of disallowed tags when the message is posted or when it's
displayed?
Have the translation done when displaying allows the behavior to be changed later but
adds duplicate work since the message r
acutally we should have pluggable support for different ways :
HTML
BBCode
Wiki
and reuse that portal wide, i.e use bbcode in news or in HTML module, etc
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850280#3850280
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss
"cooper" wrote : for the simple reason that some people want HTML to be usable in
their forum.
|
| HTML can be disable globally I think
What I was really trying to ask is, why do we need both BBCode and to allow HTML? I've
written a message board before and besides: lists, bold, italic, und
Also there is a paragraph in JACC specification:
"The standard security properties mechanism for replacing a default system Policy
implementation (see Section 2.1, "Policy Implementation Class") should not be used to
replace default system Policy provider with a delegating Policy provider."
For
It's your tool. You should take my thoughts as just another opinion.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850274#3850274
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850274
user forum seems appropriate
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850271#3850271
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850271
---
This SF.net emai
About the benefit... I don't know! ;-) I assumed it as a measure and I'm capturing it.
Maybe just to have memory deltas would be a good thing.
But, as far as I know, Runtime.gc doesn't work as well as the calling from JVMPI or
JVMTI.
Anyway... the agents will be written and convert them to anal
Hi there,
I've setup 1.1RC3 as our developer community site. Where can we propose and discuss
features and improvements? In this forum, in the Nukes Users forum or in the bug
tracker database?
Here are some ideas:
- Appending news to the index page (i know it has already been discussed). Allow
I'm trying to access a remote web service from a session bean.
I have followed the instructions in this Wiki page:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WSClientEJB
Service lookup from JNDI is successful and I can obtain the web service
port, but when I invoke a method on the service endpoint i
There is no standard portable way to authenticate against a service endpoint. If fact
the spec discourages the use of the javax.xml.rpc.security.auth.username property on
the Call object.
However, securing a SLSB with the standard J2EE role mechanism should be sufficient to
secure the endpoint.
Bugs item #973162, was opened at 2004-06-15 14:02
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by sflexus
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=973162&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: Accepted
Priori
I have some SLSB's which I've secured using JAAS. As a consequence of this, my
webservices (WS4EE) are also secured and are no longer accessible from a "standard
webservice client".
Is it possible for my users to now access these Webservices using a non-JAAS enabled
client (e.g. C#).
Is this
we invest time for development in nukes 2.x and time for fixing component of nukes 1.x
which will be ported in 2.0
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850247#3850247
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
for the simple reason that some people want HTML to be usable in their forum.
HTML can be disable globally I think
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850248#3850248
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
Bugs item #1006723, was opened at 2004-08-10 19:56
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1006723&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Pri
"jae77" wrote : "chasetec" wrote :
| | Isn't the "Disable BBCode in this post" suppossed to make the \[code\]
statement's appears as typed and not rendered in any special way?
|
| i believe that applies to all tags availble, ie: [ b ] , [ i ], etc.
|
| i would not recommend (or per
56 matches
Mail list logo
