[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: NullpointerException in Axis

2004-10-17 Thread dsosnoski
If you're referring to the WS-I Basic Profile, wrapped style most certainly is allowed - wrapped is just a set of conventions for one way of structuring doc/lit based on method call definitions. - Dennis Dennis M. Sosnoski Enterprise Java, XML, and Web Services Support

[JBoss-dev] [JMS on JBoss (JMS/JBoss)] - conf/jbossmq-state.xml

2004-10-17 Thread pilhuhn
Hi, shouldn't conf/jbossmq-state.xml be moved from conf/ to docs/examples/jms, as the file-state-service.xml is not enabled by default and also resides in the example dir? And if installed, shouldn't the state file reside in data/ or such to keep conf/ 'read-only' ? Heiko View the original

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.133 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041017050056Lbuild.133 BUILD COMPLETE-build.133Date of build:10/17/2004 05:00:56Time to build:79 minutes 57 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 04:54:12Last log entry:create

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.318 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041017062825Lbuild.318 BUILD COMPLETE-build.318Date of build:10/17/2004 06:28:25Time to build:98 minutes 29 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 05:47:56Last log entry:default non-null value for

[JBoss-dev] [JBossWS] - Re: EJB endpoint authentication and authorization

2004-10-17 Thread werner.jaeger
hi all, I'm not sure, but I think you guys forgot to add a port-component tag in jboss.xml: jboss |security-domainjava:/jaas/other/security-domain |enterprise-beans | session | ejb-nameServiceActivationLocal/ejb-name |

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.73 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041017081711Lbuild.73 BUILD COMPLETE-build.73Date of build:10/17/2004 08:17:11Time to build:77 minutes 20 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 05:49:27Last log entry:default non-null value for log

[JBoss-dev] [Web Services] - Re: 3.2.x and jaxrpc exceptions

2004-10-17 Thread tdiesler
A server exception is transported as a element with a well defined semantics. In theory it sould not contain a cause, stack trace, etc. - not even the java class name, since the client may have mapped the fault to a different exception in a different package. The fault QName is important.

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.134 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041017094316Lbuild.134 BUILD COMPLETE-build.134Date of build:10/17/2004 09:43:16Time to build:67 minutes 35 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 08:05:11Last log entry:Fix for java 1.3 - cannot

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 Build Failed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041017112337 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: 1Date of build:10/17/2004 11:23:37Time to build:13 minutes 6 secondsLast

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Deployment sorting

2004-10-17 Thread pilhuhn
At least in Branch_4_0_0, the .aop and *aop.xml files are not in the list of the DeploymentSorter. If I undestand a forum entry from Scott and Andy corretcly, then those should be deployed after deployer and before sar? View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.319 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041017121615Lbuild.319 BUILD COMPLETE-build.319Date of build:10/17/2004 12:16:15Time to build:169 minutes 13 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 11:57:37Last log entry:A simple builder for

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Deployment sorting

2004-10-17 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, in the absence of an explict declaration of the order, an unknown deployment suffix will be deployed after all others. Note that in 4.0 the deployment suffixes can be set via the SuffixOrder attribute of the org.jboss.deployment.MainDeployer-xmbean.xml found in the conf/xmdesc directory.

[JBoss-dev] [AOP on JBoss (Aspects/JBoss)] - Re: Deployment sorting

2004-10-17 Thread pilhuhn
Hm. ok. I did probably misworded my post. I did not want to assume that the aop files get implicitly deployed between 'deployer' and 'sar'. I wanted to ask if aop should not be added to either the DeploymentSorter or to the XMbean-DD you mentioned. Cheers Heiko View the original post :

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 build.74 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041017152146Lbuild.74 BUILD COMPLETE-build.74Date of build:10/17/2004 15:21:46Time to build:77 minutes 53 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 15:07:19Last log entry:Use the

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 Build Failed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041017170630 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: 1Date of build:10/17/2004 17:06:30Time to build:17 minutes 28 secondsLast

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head build.320 Build Successful

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041017172832Lbuild.320 BUILD COMPLETE-build.320Date of build:10/17/2004 17:28:32Time to build:72 minutes 59 secondsLast changed:10/17/2004 17:20:54Last log entry:Include the version.cvstag

[JBoss-dev] Re: [jboss-cvs] jmx/src/main/org/jboss/mx/modelmbean XMBean.java

2004-10-17 Thread Adrian Brock
Please run the testsuite if you are going to make modifications to core parts of JBoss. This change has enabled AttributeChangeNotifications for all standard mbeans, which means people will be receiving notifications they didn't expect. As was the case with some failing tests in the testsuite.

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 Build Failed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041017185219 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: 1Date of build:10/17/2004 18:52:19Time to build:21 minutes 4 secondsLast

[JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Bugs-1048919 ] Redeploy UIL2/OIL under java 1.3

2004-10-17 Thread SourceForge.net
Bugs item #1048919, was opened at 2004-10-17 23:54 Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter You can respond by visiting: https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailatid=376685aid=1048919group_id=22866 Category: JBossMQ Group: v3.2 Status: Open Resolution:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2 build.135 Build Fixed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041017193427Lbuild.135 BUILD COMPLETE-build.135Date of build:10/17/2004 19:34:27Time to build:58 minutes 1 secondLast changed:10/17/2004 19:23:53Last log entry:Ignore non

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041017205105 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: 1Date of build:10/17/2004 20:51:05Time to build:18 minutes 41 secondsLast

[JBoss-dev] jboss-4.0 Build Failed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041017213436 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: 1Date of build:10/17/2004 21:34:36Time to build:17 minutes 38 secondsLast

[JBoss-dev] jboss-head Build Failed

2004-10-17 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041017221757 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:file:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:89: exec returned: 1Date of build:10/17/2004 22:17:57Time to build:15 minutes 14 secondsLast