Bugs item #1049891, was opened at 2004-10-19 11:38
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1049891&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolutio
Bugs item #1048143, was opened at 2004-10-16 03:23
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by loubyansky
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1048143&group_id=22866
Category: JBossCMP
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolution: None
Priority
I have a question for you: you certainly must store XML data from EJB into file?
Why you don`t try to send thats data as a String?
For example JSP call EJB home method, which returned a String... After that your JSP
can save a String into file and work whis him...
View the original post :
http
Bugs item #1049848, was opened at 2004-10-19 10:45
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1049848&group_id=22866
Category: JBoss-IDE
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution:
I'm not sure if I understand.
The Scanner points to ./deploy and this is where I plan to "move" the module once it
is ready (move's supposed to be atomic operation in the filesystem). I might even use
a subdir, like ./deploy/manager to separate the "managed" deployments.
Why should I add a new
Yes, there are two parts to this.
First the copiletime/loadtime instrumentation of the bytecode is done (done by the
compilers)
Next, when running the instrumented app, the aop info must be present since it
contains the info for building the Class-/InstanceAdvisors that contain what aspects
a
My build of Jbos 3.2.4 fails the first time around.
Here is the CVS checkout and build commands:
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss login
cvs -z3 -d:pserver:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/cvsroot/jboss co -r JBoss_3_2_4 jboss-3.2
cd jboss-3.2/build
build
Here is the error?
compile-classes:
Bugs item #1049907, was opened at 2004-10-19 11:46
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1049907&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolutio
Feature Requests item #1049914, was opened at 2004-10-19 12:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376688&aid=1049914&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Reso
Actually it is the Subdeployers that emit org.jboss.deployment.Subdeployer.*
notifications, so maybe I could just register with them to get "start & destroy"
notifications, then go ask the MainDeployer for the status of the deployment
(STARTED/FAILED)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041019045142Lbuild.139
BUILD COMPLETE - build.139Date of build: 10/19/2004 04:51:42Time to build: 64 minutes 41 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 04:38:25Last log entry: fixed a typo
"iwadasn" wrote :
| This is basically asking for a short architectural overview. Some of this I dug up
on the forums, but I would like a fairly detailed overview. Here's a little bit of a
starting point..
|
Have you checked out our wiki? That's where all the info is kept (and in the for
Hi!
I've seen some announcement of 1.0 final release of JBossAOP next week. How did
you/are you going to clear things up with advice/aspect/annotations precedence?
Tomasz
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851879#3851879
Reply to the post :
htt
Denis says:
If you're referring to the WS-I Basic Profile, wrapped style most certainly is allowed
- wrapped is just a set of conventions for one way of structuring doc/lit based on
method call definitions.
- Dennis
Dennis M. Sosnoski
Enterprise Java, XML, and Web Services Support http://www
Hi Thomas,
when I run the testcase "Java2WSDL20TestCase, I get the following error message.
org.jboss.ws.wsdl.WSDLException: org.xml.sax.SAXException: Element type "definitions"
is not declared. @ *unknown*[2,-1]
at
org.jboss.ws.wsdl.WSDLDefinitionsFactory.parse(WSDLDefinitionsFactory.java
This is a SAX praser issue. The parser cannot validate the document using XMLSchema.
The most likeliy cause is, that your client code sees the JDK's crimson parser instead
of xerces.
JBoss uses xerces via the endorsed mechanism, include the following command line
switch.
|-Djava.endorse
Patches item #1049944, was opened at 2004-10-19 10:59
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=1049944&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolutio
Patches item #1049951, was opened at 2004-10-19 11:13
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376687&aid=1049951&group_id=22866
Category: JBossWeb
Group: v4.0
Status: Open
Resolutio
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041019060948Lbuild.326
BUILD COMPLETE - build.326Date of build: 10/19/2004 06:09:48Time to build: 76 minutes 25 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 04:41:14Last log entry: fixed a typo
OK, I got it to work.
I added the port-component element as suggested by Werner, and, instead of using
stub._setProperty, I used the following construct to pass the credentials:
Call call =
| service.createCall(
| new QName("http://com.tests/ws4ee";, "OrganizationPort"),
|
Squeak, does deploying an EAR alone with precompiled classes not work? It should. A
.aop file is not needed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851894#3851894
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
We will work on precedence after the 1.0 release. We're currently trying to close
bugs and finish documentation.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851895#3851895
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl
"Bill Burke" wrote : Squeak, does deploying an EAR alone with precompiled classes not
work? It should. A .aop file is not needed.
Sorry, Bill. I haven't tried it yet, mainly because I am still having issues witt the
AopC ant task mentioned in the other thread.
Also, I am trying to fundemental
Hi,
is it possible to intercept calls to home interfaces with JBossAOP? With the old
interceptors, this is fairly easy.
Things that I am thinking of are e.g. measure the timing of entity-Finders.
Cheers
Heiko
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p
No, it is not possible with JBoss AOP. The reason? It is because there is no class
to massage...Our EJB implementation does not generate any class that implements the
home interface. If you implemented BMP customer finders or home methods on the bean
class, then yes, JBoss AOP could be used.
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041019074504Lbuild.77
BUILD COMPLETE - build.77Date of build: 10/19/2004 07:45:04Time to build: 88 minutes 44 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 04:41:56Last log entry: fixed a typo
Do I understand it correctly, that the HomeInterface is implemented by a proxy? If so,
would a $implements (like the $instanceof one) help to do something like
pointcut="call($implements(javax.ejb.EntityHome->findBy*(..)) ?
I think a $implements expression would be nice anyway. :-)
View the o
I'm looking for forward the 1.0 release.
Why?
Because then all these user questions will move off the development list.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851904#3851904
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
Would you mind creating a AOP-user forum to use then?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851907#3851907
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851907
---
No, that is incorrect. Nothing implements the home interface (not even customer
finders and home methods) The EJB container handles home invocations dynamically or
these methods are implemented in methods on the Bean class as ejbFindMETHOD or
ejbHomeMETHOD methods.
Bill
View the original po
That's Bill's decision he is the project lead.
I think you'll find he is busy on the 1.0 release at the moment.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851911#3851911
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p
I'm not sure if I understand.
The Scanner points to ./deploy and this is where I plan to "move" the module once it
is ready (move's supposed to be atomic operation in the filesystem). I might even use
a subdir, like ./deploy/manager to separate the "managed" deployments.
Why should I add a new
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : I'm not sure if I understand.
|
| The Scanner points to ./deploy and this is where I plan to "move" the module once
it is ready (move's supposed to be atomic operation in the filesystem). I might even
use a subdir, like ./deploy/manager to separate the "managed" d
I am looking for CallableStatement caching and I understand it has been implemented
for PreparedStatemetns but not CallableStatements. Can someone point me in the right
direction of where to look in the code to add this functionality? (Where can I find
code overview docs?)
View the original p
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041019093127Lbuild.327
BUILD COMPLETE - build.327Date of build: 10/19/2004 09:31:27Time to build: 75 minutes 3 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 09:10:06Last log entry: Clarify on the use of t
Yes, exactly the Scanner works on a background thread so even if you do addURL() you
don't get immediate feedback.
Instead, I think I'll get the subdeployer notification that a module was either
started or destoyed, then I'll guery the main deployer for the DeploymentInfo object
that contains t
With the way it works at the moment you might not get a reason.
e.g. It says the EAR is deployed but an ejb it contains has failed.
Some of the messages won't be very revealing, e.g.
"Verification of ejb-jar.xml failed - see above messages for more information"
You only need to look in the forums
Bugs item #1049891, was opened at 2004-10-19 02:38
Message generated for change (Comment added) made by starksm
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1049891&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
>Status: Closed
>Resolution: Fixed
Pri
If you use JBossWS post here, if you use JBoss.NET post there. Do not post the same
message in both topics. This is spam.
You can do authetication on the message level (as SOAP headers) or on the transport
level with HTTP
See this tread or the JBossWS wiki for details
| http://www.jboss.org
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041019105833Lbuild.78
BUILD COMPLETE - build.78Date of build: 10/19/2004 10:58:33Time to build: 79 minutes 34 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 08:14:08Last log entry: added subscribe(List subs
So the only way really is to have access to the logs!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851934#3851934
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851934
---
Bugs item #1050226, was opened at 2004-10-19 18:24
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1050226&group_id=22866
Category: None
Group: None
Status: Open
Resolution: None
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041019125118Lbuild.140
BUILD COMPLETE - build.140Date of build: 10/19/2004 12:51:18Time to build: 86 minutes 43 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 12:07:24Last log entry: Add a shutdown sar for
Your comment is not visible, please respost it.
I wonder about the latest developments :-)
Thx
robisz
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851955#3851955
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851955
It did take happen in some cases. Check out the current build.xml from varia to see
how it's fixed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851956#3851956
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851956
Wanted to give an update on this for what I found.
It is definetly an issue related to the length of the command that is passed to
Runtime.exec.
To experiment, I changed the path that my class are build from long path
c:\eclipse\workspace\myproj\bin
to something very short:
c:\a
Worked grea
The usual fix for this is to allow a
--SOURCEFILES [file-name]
to be passed in to the compiler.
If the length of the file names is too large it can write them to a temp file
and pass --SOURCEFILES [tmp-file-name]
The other fix is to not use Windows :-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041019150019Lbuild.328
BUILD COMPLETE - build.328Date of build: 10/19/2004 15:00:19Time to build: 76 minutes 37 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 12:23:45Last log entry: Need local env setting
I wonder if the javac target in Ant has the same problem as I based aopc on this code.
I will try and resolve your request...We need to release 1.0 this week as other JBoss
Inc. projects are waiting on it so I can't promise anything.
But, this is a serious usability bug, so I'll put cycles into
Some (if not all) of the JBossCache configuration files contain the following MBean
definition:
|
|
|
|
I thought I would get a GUI with which I could inspect the cache, but instead I got a
"multiple MBean" exception.
I am running JBossCache in "standalone" mode, is t
Oops...
I meant I get the "multiple MBean" exception when I uncomment the XML configuration
section denoted in the previous post.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851967#3851967
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20041019165640Lbuild.79
BUILD COMPLETE - build.79Date of build: 10/19/2004 16:56:40Time to build: 82 minutes 38 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 16:45:43Last log entry: Merge the test changes fr
Bill,
You bring up a good point. I saw your comment about using javac as the basis for the
code.
In my same ant task, I also compile the same set of code using javac with no issues.
Weird.
I understand about getting 1.0 out --- I can look tonight at the differences and why
javac would work an
I am trying to create a JSE/Servlet-based web service within JBoss4.0.0. I'd like the
endpoint class to behave much like a normal Servlet where it could hold onto costly
resources obtained during the init() method and re-use them on each invocation/thread.
However, each time I execute an operat
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20041019191654Lbuild.329
BUILD COMPLETE - build.329Date of build: 10/19/2004 19:16:54Time to build: 83 minutes 15 secondsLast changed: 10/19/2004 17:52:18Last log entry: Move to more general u
Bill,
Looking at the source of the javac task -- it appears that Adrian's solution is
exactly what they do. When the user wants to fork the process, and the command line is
>4096, it outputs it to a temp file, and passes that to the compiler.
When you don't fork via with javac, there is no prob
The code can be found in the jboss-x.y/connector source module:
| org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.CachedPreparedStatement
| org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.PreparedStatementCache
| org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.BaseWrapperManagedConnection
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss
There's an overview of the source tree on the WIKI, but it doesn't go down
to indvidual source level:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=JBossJCA
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851992#3851992
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20041020003147Lbuild.141
BUILD COMPLETE - build.141Date of build: 10/20/2004 00:31:47Time to build: 66 minutes 7 secondsLast changed: 10/20/2004 00:21:04Last log entry: Tests for prepared state
59 matches
Mail list logo
