Sorry that this may not be the right moment to jump in. :-) But I don't see the
project structure contains aop and cache, for example. Should I assume that in
the future checking out jboss-head, for example, won't check out those
*standalone* modules either?
-Ben
View the original post :
http
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050111004621Lbuild.28
BUILD COMPLETE - build.28Date of build: 01/11/2005 00:46:21Time to build: 21 minutes 6 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:49:24Last log entry: Include the org
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-testsuite?log=log20050110223555Lbuild.37
BUILD COMPLETE - build.37Date of build: 01/10/2005 22:35:55Time to build: 92 minutes 2 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:13:26Last log entry: Create a distinc
The AOP plugin for IDE 1.4 seems to disable the Source menu in the java
perspective. I see the Source menu when running 1.4 under eclipse 3.0.1 without
the AOP plugin. This is a show stopper for me.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861515#38615
To what degree are we going to decompose the source tree? Take the example in
the link previously given:
http://docs.jboss.org/process-guide/en/html/structure.html
Without additional refactoring to reduce dependencies, extracting the Remoting
module would require the extraction of 9 other exis
You are free to replace the UnifiedLoader implementation with whatever you want
using the jboss jmx system properties. Its planned to provide a more
traditional parent/child class loading implementation in the not too distant
future.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mod
I noticed that when I am not connected to a network (my physical network cable
is not plugged in for example), and I configure everything to use either
localhost or 127.0.0.1, I cannot run - the JBoss/Remoting Connector throws a
socket error (cannot bind to address type exceptions). But yet, I
This is due to destroyed class loaders being used. The redeployment destroys
the previous class loader and nulls its associated repository. Any danging
references to the old class loader wil result in an NPE.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861
I have the impression that the LRUPolicy is not cleaning its eviction timer
properly after multiple stop/start on the TreeCache.
Here is what I am doing on an existing TreeCache:
| treeCache.stop
| propertyConfigurator.configure(treeCache, [new XML config])
| treeCache.start
|
The new
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20050110193826Lbuild.54
BUILD COMPLETE - build.54Date of build: 01/10/2005 19:38:26Time to build: 32 minutes 34 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 16:27:03Last log entry: added global
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : The idea of DESCRIBE is that it is not done until
we know we have the class
| available, here we can read the annotations.
|
Can you see why a getMetaData method needs to be on the joinpoint now? The
pointcut expressions match on joinpoints, not invocations. We
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050110205100Lbuild.687
BUILD COMPLETE - build.687Date of build: 01/10/2005 20:51:00Time to build: 25 minutes 9 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 16:27:03Last log entry: added global body font
anonymous wrote :
| That not what I'm saying at all. I'm saying config COULD come from XML and
that the common meta objects are instances of annotations rather than YET
ANOTHER metamodel. Annotations in and of themsleves are meta objects.
|
This is not YET ANOTHER metamodel. This is THE m
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050110182246Lbuild.59
BUILD COMPLETE - build.59Date of build: 01/10/2005 18:22:46Time to build: 52 minutes 29 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:13:26Last log entry: Create a disti
The example I saw was the throws aren't embedded making it difficult to
pick out the method name
|public void commit()
|throws RollbackException,
|HeuristicMixedException,
|HeuristicRollbackException,
|java.lang.SecurityException,
|java.lang.IllegalStateExcepti
If my memory serves me right, we were concerned that other tx manager would not
like the padding zeros. Or there was a tx manager (Informix???) that did not
like the padding. It's been too long, sorry...
I wonder if JBoss Group now has resources to test this with different tx
managers.
View th
On 1) it is opened as "rwd". Just read someplace that "rwd" is not guaranteed
on all OSs (although it says it is).
2) THis was just a quick and dirty impl. ObjectStream was used to make sure
data is valid. In future some kind of hash or checksum can be used.
3) You don't have to worry about
JBoss AOP does not require the user to write a factory, yet, the JBoss AOP user
can do simple Java Bean attribute injection.
To provide this feature, I need a generic factory that holds the
properties/attributes that need to be injected into a created aspect. When
some aspect needs binding in
Hi Bill,
Some first comments:
1) Force to disk
The current implementation does not force changes to disk, i.e. you do not know
the commit decision has been written to hardware (only the OS buffer cache).
| private void writeObject(Object obj) throws IOException
| {
|
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote :
| The main problem here being is that sometimes the aspect cannot specify or
know its dependencies until it is bound into the thing it is aspectizing.
|
Exactly, but I don't see why this affects what we are talking about.
In the MC I have a stage called "DESCRIB
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1275?page=history ]
Clebert Suconic updated JBAS-1275:
--
Attachment: jboss-testsuite-analysis.txt
Look at PGC column.
It stays constant for the entery life-cycle of the testcase.
Command line used to create this
Correct you are offtopic.
Versioned/Persistence are planned see the comments about Profile in the
design/JIRA.
These are only possible where there is some MetaData repository.
Adhoc programmatic deployment cannot persist to something that does not exist.
e.g. If you want to create a new DataSour
The deployers are aspect orientated in that each deployer deals with its own
core responsbility.
Whether it uses an jboss-aop style container or an interface is an
implementation
details.
PRO
People could plugin aspects that are not deployers, but they could do the
same thing using aspects on th
I have an ear application that is using JBossCache internally.
The JBossCache jars are packaged as part of the EAR (i'd like it to be portable
accross app server).
When doing a "hot" redeploy of my EAR, I am getting the following exception.
If I stop and restart JBoss, then everything works fine.
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050110150005Lbuild.312
BUILD COMPLETE - build.312Date of build: 01/10/2005 15:00:05Time to build: 42 minutes 16 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:13:26Last log entry: Create a distinct State
Ok, explain it to me in more detail or something I understand.
I see things from the "under the hood" perspective.
The POJO MC is responsible for creating and wiring objects.
I don't see any difference between an aspect and the target POJO at the MC
level when I talk about objects.
I do see the
Maybe this is something with 1.5 of which we don't clain support yet. Can you
test out 1.4 first to see if that works?
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861480#3861480
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=postin
Regarding the implementation of the Deployers, is there any aop magic involved?
I mean, the new MainDeployer will be another bean with the Deployers
registering either initially or later on.
Will Deployers be somekind of aspect/interceptor, or this is just at a
conceptual view in the sense that
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050110162413Lbuild.45
BUILD COMPLETE - build.45Date of build: 01/10/2005 16:24:13Time to build: 87 minutes 49 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:49:24Last log entry: Include the org
I see that Oracle requires padding the Xid to the Xid.MAXGTRIDSIZE size.
Why don't we pad all the time? Is it just a matter of trying to save a few
bytes? If so, that's kinda silly.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861477#3861477
Reply to t
The error reads:
Faild to aspectize class org.jboss.cache.TreeCache. Could not find class it
references org.jboss.remoting.ServerInvocationHandler.. Do verbose mode if you
want full stack trace.
...
at
org.jboss.aop.standalone.SystemClassLoader.loadClass(SystenClassLoader.java:191)
But CLAS
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : These seem like separate problems that should be
solved in different places.
|
| 2 and 3 seem like they should be implemented at the JCA level.
|
| For 2, when the connection is accessed, check to see if the current thread
is associated with a transaction,
I called it reverse-dependency because you are specify a dependency
but it works the other way around.
Instead of,
depends:The Queue needs a DestinationManager
you write
reverse-depends The Queue should active the DestinationManager
if it is not already active.
This enables the on-demand/manual
I think the misunderstanding comes from the two different use cases.
In the pure AOP case you don't have all the dependencies and you are doing lazy
xml parsing.
i.e. this is the case where you are running inside somebody else's container
and expect all the dependencies to be satisfied.
This is a
I'm still not understanding.
Let me rephrase what you are doing:
You have a factory: TransactionLocalFactory that needs a dependency on the
transaction manager.
| public class TransactionLocalFactory
| {
|@Inject
|public void setTransactionManager(TransactionManager tm) {};
|
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Under no circumstances should the micro container
require XML.
|
| XML is one option for configuring the server. All the XML parsing should do
| is construct kernel metadata objects. It should not be attempting to
construct the
| real objects as dependencies w
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : anonymous wrote :
| | anonymous wrote :
| | | It also unclear how the current AOP annotations/xml will feed into
the configuration
| | | in particular with relation to dependencies.
| | |
| |
| | The security aspect is a perfect exampl
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050110115956Lbuild.686
BUILD COMPLETE - build.686Date of build: 01/10/2005 11:59:56Time to build: 49 minutes 43 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:36:00Last log entry: Fixed bug with using P
anonymous wrote :
| Am I making sense now?
|
No, this doesn't explain the need for two different apis.
Let me clarify
| MetaData getMetaData()
|
is an abstraction and does not have to resolve to a chain of HashMaps.
At the container level all we are interested in asking the context f
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1276?page=history ]
Ryan Campbell reassigned JBAS-1276:
---
Assign To: Ryan Campbell (was: Scott M Stark)
> Remove usage of localhost in all tests
> --
>
> Key: JBAS-12
That's the problem. JBoss AOP does not require you to write factory. It
generically creates one for you. When an instance of the aspect is required,
it goes to this generic factory to obtain its config settings.
Bill
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=view
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20050110134316Lbuild.253
BUILD COMPLETE - build.253Date of build: 01/10/2005 13:43:16Time to build: 29 minutes 32 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 11:49:24Last log entry: Include the org/jboss/t
I have developed the necessary classes to use Jotm as a transaction manager in
Jboss. I only performed some simple test involving two Jboss servers. The tests
included some error conditions to see the correct propagation of rollback
between the servers.
When I developed this classes I was thinki
Scott,
Thanks for the reply. Given that there is still a problem here, do you feel
that the suggested workaround should be put somewhere in your official
documentation (i.e. provide some recommended ways to preload all your
classes...)?
It seems to me that Sun has two problems:
1) They loc
anonymous wrote :
| anonymous wrote :
| | It also unclear how the current AOP annotations/xml will feed into the
configuration
| | in particular with relation to dependencies.
| |
|
| The security aspect is a perfect example here. The way I have it
implemented now in my as
anonymous wrote :
| * The first is, I need a common Joinpoint model that spans both Javassist
and java.lang.reflect so that the pointcut matching and aspect binding can be
done with other model. Besides greatly simplifying the AOP code, it allows
pointcut matching and advice binding to happe
I wrote an FAQ on this:
http://www.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=3rdPartyTM
It is not necessary for the TransactionManager to implement XATerminator
only that the TransactionManagerService tells you what implements it.
As for tidying up associations, this could be done with a Transaction
synchron
Hi!
I've tried to work through the tutorial. I am stuck at the point where the
TreeCache should be initialized (new TreeCache()) via the BeanShell. The JBoss
ClassLoader complains, that it can't find a JBoss class that I can see in a jar
in the lib dir. So the AOP stuff of the Classloader fails.
I got the exact same error when using the new name with an old JBossCache
version (you have an old JBossCache package but you look at the latest
documentation).
Using the correct value for the correct JBossCache version solved the problem
for me.
Thomas
View the original post :
http://www.jbo
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-65?page=history ]
Kabir Khan updated JBAOP-65:
Fix Version: 2.0
> PER_INSTANCE & PER_JOINPOINT scoped interceptors/aspects should be per called
> instance
> --
Please if any one can help!
We are running JBoss 3.2 with TomCat behind Pix firewall.
We have an external IP(upstream) and an internal IP(downstream).
The client can not access JBoss at all even though all ports are open (for
testing).
any suggestion?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.o
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1256?page=comments#action_12314612 ]
Bela Ban commented on JBAS-1256:
Fixed JBCACHE-32
> http session replication fails under load
> -
>
> Key: JBAS-1256
>
Thomas is correct. timeToIdleSeconds is replaced by timeToLiveSeconds for
clarity. But I am surprised that it causes any problem. Can you show me how can
I reproduec this problem?
See the example unit tests in the distro on how to start/stop cache.
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jbo
We are having this same exception, but it occurs when running packaging on a
Java project. Has anyone made any progress on this? I can disable source
control or disable the JBoss-IDE plugin and everything works. Seems to be an
interaction problem between the two plugins on Eclipse 3.0.1. Any
Ehhh. I meant: JBossCache 1.2 . Sorry ;-)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861430#3861430
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3861430
---
The
PER_INSTANCE & PER_JOINPOINT scoped interceptors/aspects should be per called
instance
--
Key: JBAOP-65
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-65
Project: JBoss AOP
Type: Featu
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-10?page=history ]
Kabir Khan closed JBAOP-10:
---
Resolution: Done
The implementation is currently a bit naive, in that the PER_INSTANCE,
PER_JOINPOINT aspects are created per calling rather than called (i.e. target
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-30?page=history ]
Bela Ban updated JBCACHE-30:
Description:
SourceForge Submitter: jiwils .
Some if not all of the JBossCache configuration XML
files contain the following commented MBean definition:
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-16?page=history ]
Bela Ban updated JBCACHE-16:
Description:
Plan for content development of JGroups/JBoss Cache training modules (working
towards "JBoss Clustering" training).
The plan includes identifying the co
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1256?page=history ]
Bela Ban reassigned JBAS-1256:
--
Assign To: Ben Wang (was: Bela Ban)
> http session replication fails under load
> -
>
> Key: JBAS-1256
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-32?page=history ]
Bela Ban resolved JBCACHE-32:
-
Resolution: Done
Fixed accoridng to proposed solution
> Transaction already active on replication's PREPARE phase
> ---
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1279?page=history ]
Scott M Stark resolved JBAS-1279:
-
Resolution: Done
Fix Version: JBossAS-4.0.2RC1
The shutdown command has been updated.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] bin]$ shutdown.sh -S
Exception in thread "
You can look at how it is done in the forums portlet.
Everything is in a different package (called jbportal-forums.war as of today)
The following code got from ForumsPortlet.java, will 'find' the jsp file in the
same context.
| PortletRequestDispatcher rd =
|
getPortletCont
Just wondering if there's any more thoughts on this problem? Basically I'm
having to add my JSPs into the nukes-core.war for them to be found by my
portlet app...
Kev
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861403#3861403
Reply to the post :
http://
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : it is possible to deploy several portal as well
each of those portal is accessible by /portal/1stportal/
I've been trying this, but even with a very simple my-portal.xml I get an
error, e.g.
|
|
|myportal
|
| VIEW
| EDIT
| H
shutdown -u -p
---
Key: JBAS-1279
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1279
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Feature Request
Versions: JBossAS-4.0.1 Final
Reporter: Wonne Keysers
Assigned to: Scott M Stark
This feature does
Unimplemented spec requirement?
---
Key: JBAS-1280
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1280
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Components: EJBs
Versions: JBossAS-3.2.6 Final
Environment: jboss326
sun jdk142_06
it is possible to deploy several portal as well each of those portal is
accessible by /portal/1stportal/
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861397#3861397
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38613
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote :
| 1/ creating instances of portlets in portlet-instances.xml
| 2/ placing windows of these instances in a portal page by modifying
| default-portal.xml
|
But if want something like "http://mysite.lt/1stportal/"; ? Not the default
portal, I mean.
"[EMAIL PR
indeed.
in JBoss Portal it is done by :
1/ creating instances of portlets in portlet-instances.xml
2/ placing windows of these instances in a portal page by modifying
default-portal.xml
for now it is not easy to do that, by the end of the week we will provide an
easy way to do it, plus documen
Hi,
I have resubmitted this patch (misc-fixes-20050108-2.zip). I have removed the
heap protection and the white space fixes (will submit these seperately). I
have added a JUnit to check that the Mail object can be serialized (can't seem
to get the JMS Unit tests to work).
I have broken each
Hi everyone.
Where can I found information on how to build my portal using the JBoss Portal
? I know portal is made of portlets, but the portlet's specification says
nothing about how to "assemble" all portlets into a portal. As I understand
this part is portal-specific, am I right ?
If so, co
Group RPC hangs
---
Key: JGRP-23
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-23
Project: JGroups
Type: Bug
Versions: 2.2.8
Reporter: Bela Ban
Assigned to: Bela Ban
Fix For: 2.2.8
[submitted by Yuri Finkelstein]
I think I'm on to som
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050110063102Lbuild.685
BUILD COMPLETE - build.685Date of build: 01/10/2005 06:31:02Time to build: 46 minutes 9 secondsLast changed: 01/10/2005 06:04:53Last log entry: use updated xml binding
session variables are shared between different sessions
---
Key: JBAS-1278
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1278
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Components: Web (Tomcat) service
Environme
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-22?page=comments#action_12314608 ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-22:
--
[by Steve Woodcock]
Bela - the new encrypt protocol (perhaps confusingly) is
called ENCRYPT not Encrypt1_4 (which is the old one).
I cannot comment
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-22?page=history ]
Bela Ban updated JGRP-22:
-
SourceForge Reference:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1097727&group_id=6081&atid=106081
> Enhance the ENCRYPT or the ENCRYPT1_4 protocol
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-22?page=history ]
Bela Ban updated JGRP-22:
-
Version: 2.2.8
Fix Version: 2.2.9
> Enhance the ENCRYPT or the ENCRYPT1_4 protocol
> ---
>
> Key: JGRP-22
>
J2EE compliant server configuration
---
Key: JBAS-1277
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1277
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Feature Request
Components: Installer, Build System
Versions: JBossAS-4.0.1 Final
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-21?page=comments#action_12314607 ]
Bela Ban commented on JGRP-21:
--
What about the STABLE problem ? Same ?
Can I close this case ?
> Doubled messages in the UNICAST layer are not discarded
>
Bugs item #1099365, was opened at 2005-01-10 10:34
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1099365&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolutio
Enhance the ENCRYPT or the ENCRYPT1_4 protocol
---
Key: JGRP-22
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-22
Project: JGroups
Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Roland Rïz
Assigned to: Bela Ban
The ENCRYPT and the E
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JGRP-21?page=comments#action_12314606 ]
Roland Rïz commented on JGRP-21:
The code in UNICAST is ok, sorry. The doubling of the message occurred in my
test case because the UNICAST.up() method removes its own header (U
Bugs item #1099355, was opened at 2005-01-10 10:14
Message generated for change (Tracker Item Submitted) made by Item Submitter
You can respond by visiting:
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=1099355&group_id=22866
Category: JBossServer
Group: v3.2
Status: Open
Resolutio
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-31?page=history ]
Bela Ban updated JBCACHE-31:
Attachment: CacheMemTest.java
> Out of memory problem
> -
>
> Key: JBCACHE-31
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-31
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-31?page=history ]
Bela Ban updated JBCACHE-31:
Comment: was deleted
> Out of memory problem
> -
>
> Key: JBCACHE-31
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBCACHE-31
> P
I do not think there are any differences between the two.
According to the documentation and CVS source tree, it seems to be a renaming
that occurs in JBossCache 1.2.
The timeToIdleSeconds in JBossCache < 1.2 became timeToLiveSeconds in 1.2.
I am not sure what you mean by turn "ON/OFF", but call
I am getting the following Exception with JBossCache eviction policy of a tree
cache with the following entry in xml file.
attribute name="EvictionPolicyConfig"300300300http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3861372#3861372
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/i
Yes, you always need the entire JBoss (this will change in the future).
The do a full build:
cd build
build.sh
After that you can build JBossCache separately (e.g. if you make modifications):
cd cache
./build.sh
./build.sh dist // creates a ZIP file for distro in output
View the original post :
89 matches
Mail list logo
