the same error happen again even i seperate the war from sar file if i set the
context root to "/".
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870833#3870833
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870833
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20050319005126
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbos
Hi,
I try to unjar the portal-core.sar file and take the portal-core.war file out
from the sar file.
Then deploy the new portal-core.sar file and portal-core.war file. Then the
error msg gone.
I think more explaination about the build.xml script and the functions of the
each components of the
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050318234339Lbuild.80
BUILD COMPLETE - build.80Date of build: 03/18/2005 23:43:39Time to build: 28 minutes 4 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 15:46:11Last log entry: Added serialVer
DS: add hibernate.dialect metadata
--
Key: EJBTHREE-105
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/EJBTHREE-105
Project: EJB 3.0
Type: Feature Request
Versions: Preview 4
Environment: Linux, JDK 1.5; Jboss 4.0.1sp1
Reporter: J
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050318230237Lbuild.111
BUILD COMPLETE - build.111Date of build: 03/18/2005 23:02:37Time to build: 24 minutes 20 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 20:18:35Last log entry: This class d
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050318224120Lbuild.445
BUILD COMPLETE - build.445Date of build: 03/18/2005 22:41:20Time to build: 14 minutes 58 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 20:18:35Last log entry: This class does need to
When i undeploy portal-core by removeing from the default/deploy directory,
Following error displayed and
jboss.web:J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none,j2eeType=WebModule,name=//localhost/
dispeared from the jmx-console. But others like
#
J2EEApplication=none,J2EEServer=none,WebModule=//lo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050318210737Lbuild.895
BUILD COMPLETE - build.895Date of build: 03/18/2005 21:07:37Time to build: 20 minutes 2 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 20:16:14Last log entry: This class does need to
I suspected that something is wrong in the .../data/portal/directory.
Because when rebuild/redeploy from source, i need to clean
~/jboss-4.0.1sp1/server/default/tmp, work, data directories. Otherwise, the
portal server will fail and cannot access the portal page.
In addition, in the jmx-c
FYI:
ava version "1.4.2_07"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_07-b05)
Java HotSpot(TM) Client VM (build 1.4.2_07-b05, mixed mode)
Linux ibmt41 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux
jboss-4.0.1sp1 and jboss-portal just be check out from cvs.
Even i change the context root to /portal. the same thing happen.
yang
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870825#3870825
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870825
-
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050318185321
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml
James,
Maybe you need to describe youe use case more specfically. But fromt he latest
stack trace that you attached, it indicates that jms is calling TreeCache.
Nothing in there says TreeCacheAop (while you should have had).
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20050318174917Lbuild.315
BUILD COMPLETE - build.315Date of build: 03/18/2005 17:49:17Time to build: 26 minutes 54 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 15:46:11Last log entry: Added serialVersionUID
I don't understand your question Ben, can you elaborate? My assumption is that
this is happening with the TreeCacheAop and that the exception messages are
listed as coming from the TreeCache and ReplicationInterceptor since these
classes are used by the TreeCacheAop class, and since my applicat
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-55?page=comments#action_12316262 ]
Dimitris Andreadis commented on JBAS-55:
Independent of how we proceed with the aspectized deployers, I think we should
probably backport from HEAD to 4.x/3.x the hooks
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Ok, so what I would like to see is that Adrian,
myself and others provide as freakishly complex as needed xml documents and the
associated object model as content that goes into the xml binding testsuite. We
need to evolve the associated schema and if necessary, exter
This latest stacktrace shows only jms and TreeCache. This is not aop though?
-Ben
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870815#3870815
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870815
--
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : That is what I am going to try prototyping in the
jbossxb testcases. I think it will have to be under a different namespace in
order for jbossxb to know what to do with it:
|
|
| |
| |SimpleBean
| |
| |
| |
| |
| |
| package org.jboss.test.xml;
| public class SundayUnitTestCase
|public void testKernel() throws Exception
|
Contains binding for kernel's XML schema based on what I have seen in the
XMLKernelDeployer and XML test files.
The method is in comments since kernel's classes are not in th
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050318163313
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xm
I guess I spoke too soon, as the exceptions are now happening again. Do these
point to anything of interest?
17:31:42,780 WARN [ReplicationInterceptor] runPreparePhase() failed.
Transaction is marked as rolled back
| org.jboss.cache.lock.TimeoutException: rsp=sender=10.10.10.23:39099,
retva
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20050318151922Lbuild.94
BUILD COMPLETE - build.94Date of build: 03/18/2005 15:19:22Time to build: 40 minutes 7 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 14:05:44Last log entry: Refactored pro
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1579?page=history ]
Ivelin Ivanov reassigned JBAS-1579:
---
Assign To: Clebert Suconic
> Need to cleanup the serialVersionUIDs for Serializable/Externalizable classes
> -
Create a compatibility matrix which tracks JBoss client vs. server class
versions
--
Key: JBAS-1598
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1598
Project: JBoss Application Server
Ty
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1579?page=comments#action_12316260 ]
Scott M Stark commented on JBAS-1579:
-
Agreed that the org.jboss.management.j2ee.J2EEManagedObject should not be
Serializable. All of the org.jboss.metadata.* really shou
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1579?page=comments#action_12316258 ]
Dimitris Andreadis commented on JBAS-1579:
--
I've fixed a couple of classes:
org.jboss.deployment.DeploymentState
org.jboss.deployment.SerializedDeploymentInfo
org.jb
Back to the original topic -- I have changed the TreeCacheAop's IsolationLevel
attribute value from REPEATABLE_READ to READ_COMMITTED, and so far the
TimeoutExceptions have not reappeared. Hopefully this simple fix will be a
permanent solution to the deadlock problem I was experiencing.
--Jame
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050318134359Lbuild.444
BUILD COMPLETE - build.444Date of build: 03/18/2005 13:43:59Time to build: 39 minutes 2 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 13:22:22Last log entry: Minor check while closin
also the app server is jboss-4.0.1sp1
Something that i also didn't mention previously is that when i try to run the
build.bat file i get this:
D:\tutorials\portal\build>build.bat
| Executing D:\tutorials\portal\build\..\tools\bin\ant.bat -logger
org.apache.tools.ant.NoB
| annerLogger
|
Shit, ...catching up...I guess all the jaxb stuff is for providing any metadata
format you want...
I've said this before, but I think its important to try to be consistent on how
XML/MetaObjects/Annotations all relate to one another. I've tried successfully
to keep annotations and the metaobje
Check if we work on JRockit
---
Key: JBAOP-100
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAOP-100
Project: JBoss AOP
Type: Task
Versions: 1.1.1
Reporter: Kabir Khan
Assigned to: Kabir Khan
--
This message is automatically gene
That is what I am going to try prototyping in the jbossxb testcases. I think it
will have to be under a different namespace in order for jbossxb to know what
to do with it:
|
|SimpleBean
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bean2
|
|
|
|
but this can a
Is there anything yet for describing metadata (no property configuration). The
way we do it in JBoss AOP right now is two different ways. One untyped, the
other typed (annotated) metadata
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/1.1/aspect-framework/reference/en/html/xml.html#xml-metadata
http://docs.jboss.
It doesn't looks like a benchmark specific problem.
Although Specj2002 is discontinued now. You should try Specj2004.
Clebert
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870787#3870787
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=po
Rather than using annotations directly to mark the transactions, an option to
avoid 1.4 and 5.0 annotation style issues would be to apply the tx attributes
via metadata.
http://docs.jboss.org/aop/1.1/aspect-library/reference/transaction_demarcation.html
Or you could look at using annotation int
Try to build your compliance tests starting from what Adrian suggested
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/objectweb/jtests/
and
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/jbossmq/
No need to get into JBoss-specific API testing ju
anonymous wrote :
| Only thing is that the metadata becomes invalidatable...
|
Correct.
Now my next suggestion is to allow ANY content from all the way down from the
root element...
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Bean2
|
|
|
|
Become
a. The current JMS Facade in CVS is just an incomplete prototype. DO NOT try to
run any test on it, or you will just waste your time.
b. I plan to check in the new JMS Facade some time this weekend. When I do it,
I will make an announcement on this forum.
c. Do not use org.jboss.messaging.uti
scratchdir fails for multi-user installs
Key: JBWEB-16
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-16
Project: JBoss Web
Type: Bug
Components: Tomcat
Versions: JBossWeb-4.0.1
Reporter: Norman Richards
Assign
anonymous wrote :
| I'll have to think about that one. It requires interaction with the
classloader
| which I definitly don't want to do in the xml parsing (the classloader may
not
| even exist at that point).
|
A early binding of the FQN to a classloader, while nice and would be reall
Create a deployment instance doc illustrating the extension point requirements
--
Key: JBXB-8
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-8
Project: JBoss XML Binding (JBossXB)
Type: Sub-task
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-7?page=history ]
Scott M Stark updated JBXB-7:
-
Summary: Create a deployment instance doc illustrating the polymorphism
requirements (was: Create a deployment instance doc illustrating the
polymorphism requrieme
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-5?page=history ]
Scott M Stark updated JBXB-5:
-
Environment: Usecase Resources:
jboss-head/testsuite/src/resources/xml/pojoserver (was: )
> Evolve the schema driven binding to that needed by the pojoserver
> ---
Create a deployment instance doc illustrating the polymorphism requriements
---
Key: JBXB-7
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-7
Project: JBoss XML Binding (JBossXB)
Type: Sub-task
R
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-103?page=history ]
Charles Crouch deleted JBADMCON-103:
> Implement and test "Controller"
> ---
>
> Key: JBADMCON-103
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-101?page=history ]
Charles Crouch deleted JBADMCON-101:
> Implement and test "Model"
> --
>
> Key: JBADMCON-101
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-98?page=history ]
Charles Crouch deleted JBADMCON-98:
---
> Implement and test "View"
> -
>
> Key: JBADMCON-98
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-98
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-102?page=history ]
Charles Crouch deleted JBADMCON-102:
> Implement and test "View"
> -
>
> Key: JBADMCON-102
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-10
Thank you. I would like to know about some production level deployments.
How many nodes, (with small objects associated) is typically recommended in a
tree cache? Maybe a range would give me a better idea.
Are there any best practices for using TreeCache?
View the original post :
http://
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-97?page=history ]
Charles Crouch deleted JBADMCON-97:
---
> Implement and test "Model"
> --
>
> Key: JBADMCON-97
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-97
>
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBADMCON-99?page=history ]
Charles Crouch deleted JBADMCON-99:
---
> Implement and test "Controller"
> ---
>
> Key: JBADMCON-99
> URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBA
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050318111008Lbuild.894
BUILD COMPLETE - build.894Date of build: 03/18/2005 11:10:08Time to build: 45 minutes 38 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 10:13:57Last log entry: Added serialVersionUID
Create xsd for current pojo server xml deployer
---
Key: JBXB-6
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-6
Project: JBoss XML Binding (JBossXB)
Type: Sub-task
Reporter: Scott M Stark
Assigned to: Scott M Stark
Ne
Ok, so what I would like to see is that Adrian, myself and others provide as
freakishly complex as needed xml documents and the associated object model as
content that goes into the xml binding testsuite. We need to evolve the
associated schema and if necessary, external binding metadata to the
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-5?page=history ]
Scott M Stark updated JBXB-5:
-
Description:
Ok, so what I would like to see is that Adrian, myself and others provide as
freakishly complex as needed xml documents and the associated object model as
Evolve the schema driven binding to that needed by the pojoserver
-
Key: JBXB-5
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBXB-5
Project: JBoss XML Binding (JBossXB)
Type: Feature Request
Reporter: Scot
I am not sure if this is what you are asking for but here it is:
ant ->1.6.2
portal ->Portal 2.0 Beta 1 Release
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870763#3870763
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0?log=log20050318094244Lbuild.443
BUILD COMPLETE - build.443Date of build: 03/18/2005 09:42:44Time to build: 45 minutes 50 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 09:36:04Last log entry: Added serialVersionUID
adapt property sheet according to context in xml tab
Key: JBIDE-134
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-134
Project: JBoss IDE
Type: Task
Components: jBPM Designer plugin
Reporter: Koen Aers
Assig
I built a EJBModule using Jbuilder. When i try to deploy it, i recieve the
following error. Could anybody give me a hint about what is happening?
Thanks.
at org.jboss.ejb.EJBDeployer.create(EJBDeployer.java:569)
... 67 more
08:21:29,104 INFO [TomcatDeployer] deploy, ctxPath=/jm
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : you are under the right module except the directory
is lock instead of aop.
|
When I go to jboss/jbosstest/src/main/org/jboss/test/lock/test I don't see the
file you mentioned.
Am I using the wrong interface, i.e. is there a better way than using the
online CVS b
"mikezzz" wrote : anonymous wrote : or maybe implement a Lucene index
|
| This is not such a bad idea. Perhaps not to support the Mail API but to
support protocols that require search. We could use lucene, or roll our own
that will allow joins directly from the index to the message rows.
me? accused of subtlety? Excellent Dawie. No expectations man. Just planning
Compression and AOP transactions sounds good. Subtly under AOP transactions
ought to be "rip out all stateless session beans". Still, you'll need to make
it work for 1.4 and 1.5 so at least you have a challenge.
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596?page=comments#action_12316253 ]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1596:
-
Ok, thanks. You answered my question.
> collection_valued_path_expression IS [NOT] EMPTY does not work
> --
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596?page=comments#action_12316252 ]
Johan Borchers commented on JBAS-1596:
--
I do not know exactly by what you are saying "changing the query".
But a changed the query. I redeployed, I restarted JBoss. etc.
Update docs for the 4.0.2 release
-
Key: JBAS-1597
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1597
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Task
Components: Documentation
Versions: JBossAS-4.0.2RC1
Reporter: Scott M St
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2?log=log20050318090520Lbuild.314
BUILD COMPLETE - build.314Date of build: 03/18/2005 09:05:20Time to build: 22 minutes 21 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 07:44:45Last log entry: Doesn't need to be Seri
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596?page=comments#action_12316251 ]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1596:
-
Have you made any changes to the queries before posting them here? They don't
seem to be generated by the sql92 compiler.
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596?page=comments#action_12316250 ]
Johan Borchers commented on JBAS-1596:
--
I did try to use the SQL92 compiler for testing the EJB-QL:
SELECT OBJECT(c) FROM Contract AS c, IN(c.tasks) AS t WHERE c.tasks IS
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1391?page=comments#action_12316249 ]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1391:
-
First step is done.
- local managed connection factory is added in
package org.jboss.resource.adapter.jdbc.local;
public c
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head?log=log20050318081856Lbuild.893
BUILD COMPLETE - build.893Date of build: 03/18/2005 08:18:56Time to build: 21 minutes 36 secondsLast changed: 03/18/2005 07:47:04Last log entry: Doesn't need to be Ser
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Scott and I had a conversation.
| We are going to look at generating the ObjectModel from a schema
| using JBossXB.
| This will need some feedback from Alex.
So, it looks like the approach when an XML schema drives the Java object model
development. I think, Anil
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : The complexity possible in the nesting of bean
properties is not evident from the current testcases, and it did not jump out
at me that the java configuration of the jbossxb factory supports this.
It depends on what API you looked at. For the latest API (sunday packag
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : Another issue that jumps out is how to reverse the
process.
| e.g. Given an MC metadata config how do we identify the marshalling
| of these javabeans back into an xml file?
With marshalling metadata.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?modul
[ http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596?page=history ]
Alexey Loubyansky reassigned JBAS-1596:
---
Assign To: Alexey Loubyansky
> collection_valued_path_expression IS [NOT] EMPTY does not work
> --
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596?page=comments#action_12316248 ]
Alexey Loubyansky commented on JBAS-1596:
-
This query SELECT OBJECT(c) FROM Contract AS c, IN(c.tasks) AS t WHERE c.tasks
IS EMPTY doesn't make sense.
IN(c.tasks) mea
Very good thoughts, but one important aspect has not been discussed yet.
You'll need to tell the i18N object which Locale to use or specify a particular
ResourceBundle with the correct Locale already set on it. Perhaps a new
FileWriter would be appropriate in this case with XML attributes in
First one is from sonic,not sure about the licensing issues.
http://www.sonicsoftware.com/products/sonicmq/performance_benchmarking/index.ssp
Second one is an open source performance testing framework for J2EE called
Grinder developed by folks at BEA
http://grinder.sourceforge.net/
I have hear
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-124?page=comments#action_12316247 ]
Jïrg Kïtemeier commented on JBIDE-124:
--
oh ... by the way...
I used JBoss 4.0.1sp1
and the original line at 255 is:
fileName = fileName.substring(0, fileName.length()
[
http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBIDE-124?page=comments#action_12316246 ]
Jïrg Kïtemeier commented on JBIDE-124:
--
I have had exactly the same problem when I tried to integrate struts into my
1.4 application.
It costs me a long night to figure
a. got the reason--
org.jboss.messaging.jms.server.container.ServerConnectionInterceptor.invoke()
functionality still has to be imlpemented.
b.Would appreciate if the timelines when the JMSFacade would be in place,for
my testcases to run and do their job.
c.i am using the following way of
this is strange, and this does appzar if you don't set the portal on / ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870732#3870732
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870732
I am editing some jsp files which generate VoiceXML files.
The root tag is the following:
http://www.w3.org/2001/vxml";
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance";
xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2001/vxml
http://www.w3.org/TR/voicexml20/vxml.xsd";>
The
fixed SerializableSerializer
Key: JBPM-91
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBPM-91
Project: JBoss jBPM
Type: Bug
Components: Core Engine
Versions: jBPM 2.0
Reporter: Tom Baeyens
Assigned to: Tom Baeyens
Fix Fo
Create JK1.2 branch
---
Key: JBWEB-15
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBWEB-15
Project: JBoss Web
Type: Task
Components: Tomcat Connectors
Reporter: Mladen Turk
Assigned to: Mladen Turk
Create a JK1.2 branch with current status afte
collection_valued_path_expression IS [NOT] EMPTY does not work
--
Key: JBAS-1596
URL: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBAS-1596
Project: JBoss Application Server
Type: Bug
Components: CMP service
V
A critical bug has been found in JBoss-Forums beta 1, new packages has been
released as "jboss-forums-2.0.0-beta1a".
If you are using jboss-forums-2.0.0-beta1 please consider updating.
(It does not affect the core, so if you are not using the forums nothing has to
be done.)
View the original p
Hi,i
According serviet specs, context-root and url-pattern can be used to select
the target.
how does this work for Acessing a portal?
In page http://docs.jboss.org/jbportal/v2.0beta1/reference-guide/html_single/,
it is described somethng about how to accessing a portal. But it is not cl
anonymous wrote : or maybe implement a Lucene index
This is not such a bad idea. Perhaps not to support the Mail API but to
support protocols that require search. We could use lucene, or roll our own
that will allow joins directly from the index to the message rows. I think
this could be a P
For the store:
- AOP transactions
- Compression
- Indexing??
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3870715#3870715
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3870715
---
Sounds my last friday night
Currently the store doesn't use EJBs it uses the Client Transaction explicitly,
which really does make you feel dirty afterwards.
AOP transactions for the store will be M4.
Mike.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=
93 matches
Mail list logo
