Just a friendly request.
If you are going to reformat code, can you please submit the
reformat *INDEPENDENTLY* of any modifications you make.
Doing them together makes it almost impossible to understand/see
what changes you made.
--
Adrian Brock
Chief Scientist
JBoss
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-testsuite?log=log20050509091859
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:66: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050509152434
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line:
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-jdk-matrix?log=log20050509154200
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line:
Since I am now doing all new development in the JBossRemoting module,
which is stand alone, I would like to make a few changes as to how
jboss-head picks up the remoting code.
First, I would like to make the remoting code visible to jboss-head as a
binary. For the old build, this means adding
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-4.0-jdk-matrix?log=log20050509175454
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-head.xml:63: The following error occurred while executing this line:
Tom,
JBossCache is in the same boat. Scott has mentioned that he will take
care of that soon. So I will let him chime in on this one.
Cheers,
-Ben
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Tom
Elrod
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2005 1:34 PM
To:
Sorry for the *spam*. I have posted this to the Cache forum. But I
figure I can cast a wider net to solicit more idea here. :-)
I am starting to gather a use case for the TreeCacheAop white paper
after the fine-grained http session replication is almost complete.
I want your contribution for
That is fine, but I'm creating a jbossbuild script that will generate
the legacy thirdparty structure from the repository to get rid of the
existing thirdparty cvs tree. I would like to have the option of not
having to checkout the legacy thirdparty tree as part of the
jboss-4.0/jboss-head co and
I have a 25997040 Mb IzPack based installer available on sourceforge:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/jboss/jboss-4.0.2-installer.jar?downl
oad
that illustrates the direction we are looking to head in terms of a much
more flexible installation packaging. This is a default configuration
10 matches
Mail list logo
