[JBoss-dev] jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5 Build Timed Out

2006-01-25 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5?log=log20060125001807 BUILD TIMED OUTAnt Error Message:build timeoutDate of build:01/25/2006 00:18:07Time to build:Last changed:12/31/2005 20:37:24Last log entry:JBREM-272:Added tests for (clientPool

RE: [JBoss-dev] jsr77 stats

2006-01-25 Thread Dimitris Andreadis
Its a bug, but I only see the MILLISECOND value being used. I dont see that javax.management.j2ee.statistics.TimeStatistic has these constants in the 4.0 branch, so where are you seeing that? Actually, it was removed from 4.x, should be ok now. From: [EMAIL

[JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread acoliver
1. @Tx tags can only be used on classes but not interfaces (in the case of MBeans) a. reason this would be handled by the MBean deployer adding a transaction interceptor rather than AOP proper. b. there is no framework within jboss for XMBeans using attribute tags to specify interception

Re: [JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread Bill Burke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. @Tx tags can only be used on classes but not interfaces (in the case of MBeans) a. reason this would be handled by the MBean deployer adding a transaction interceptor rather than AOP proper. b. there is no framework within jboss for XMBeans using attribute

[JBoss-dev] FW: [EJB 3.0] - Re: hibernate client jar

2006-01-25 Thread Kabir Khan
I'll try to take a look tomorrow, and include the missing files in the hibernate-client.jar But should this file not be created by hibernate rather than as part of the ejb 3 build? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 25 January 2006 18:47 To:

[JBoss-dev] Re: FW: [EJB 3.0] - Re: hibernate client jar

2006-01-25 Thread Max Rydahl Andersen
On Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:54:08 +0100, Kabir Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'll try to take a look tomorrow, and include the missing files in the hibernate-client.jar But should this file not be created by hibernate rather than as part of the ejb 3 build? sure, patches to our build is very

Re: [JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread acoliver
Bill Burke wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. @Tx tags can only be used on classes but not interfaces (in the case of MBeans) a. reason this would be handled by the MBean deployer adding a transaction interceptor rather than AOP proper. b. there is no framework within jboss for

Re: [JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread Bill Burke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill Burke wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. @Tx tags can only be used on classes but not interfaces (in the case of MBeans) a. reason this would be handled by the MBean deployer adding a transaction interceptor rather than AOP proper. b. there is no

Re: [JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread acoliver
Having the dependency information will make things work a lot more smoothly for us, we will still not be able to use service beans without at least deploytime dependency injection. We will have to continue to kludge around these holes in the near future but one day 5.0 will fix all of our

Re: [JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread Bill Burke
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Having the dependency information will make things work a lot more smoothly for us, we will still not be able to use service beans without at least deploytime dependency injection. We will have to continue to kludge around these holes in the near future but one day

[JBoss-dev] ejb3-4.0-testsuite Build Failed

2006-01-25 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/ejb3-4.0-testsuite?log=log20060125133530 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-ejb3-4.0-testsuite.xml:83: Exit code: 1 See tests.log in Build Artifacts for details.Date of

Re: [JBoss-dev] Some integration holes in JBAS4.x

2006-01-25 Thread acoliver
I guess that could workits extremely undesireable, but technically feasible. It would be rather unpleasent to look up ever independent attribute as a seperate JNDI lookup and forcibly inject it. For the moment dealing with the drawbacks of XMBeans and the integration issues is less

[JBoss-dev] jboss-3.2-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-01-25 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-3.2-testsuite?log=log20060125183155 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:191: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-portal-2.0-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-01-25 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-portal-2.0-testsuite?log=log20060126005015 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-portal.xml:67: The following error occurred while executing this line:

[JBoss-dev] jboss-portal-2.2-testsuite Build Failed

2006-01-25 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-portal-2.2-testsuite?log=log20060126005306 BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-portal.xml:57: Exit code: 1 See compile.log in Build Artifacts for details.Date of

[JBoss-dev] jboss-cache-testsuite Build Completed With Testsuite Errors

2006-01-25 Thread qa
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-cache-testsuite?log=log20060126005415 TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message:/services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-JBossCache.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: