View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-hsqldb-testsuite?log=log20060414021516
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:85: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/buil
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.4?log=log20060413223546
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060413214803
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scrip
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-oracle-testsuite?log=log20060413220338
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:100: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/bui
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-mysql-testsuite?log=log20060413220112
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:92: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060413193706
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scrip
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-head-jdk-matrix?log=log20060413190648
BUILD FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-common.xml:220: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scrip
At least 2.1.2jboss. I see hibernate is compatible with 2.1.3 which has
the jboss changes rolled in (need to verify all changes are in) so could
possibly go with that.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
Ok, we will do it this way and change it after the release.
Another question,
Which version of cglib are we supposed to be using? I see head has 2.1.1
yet 4.0.x has 2.1.2jboss?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark
>
The reason is I don't want inconsistent defaults for bytecode
generation. If this is handled by the integration layers that is fine,
but let's get those layers configured correctly to use javassist by
default.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
I would guess that actually breaks regardless as the thing that gets
serialized in the two cases is completely different under the covers
between those two versions of hibernate because of the introduction of
the javassist capability. If this situation is really a requirement, we
will probably nee
I don't want cglib leaking to the client, but if it's only for server
side components the script can look into the server lib dirs to avoid
this.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Jason T. Greene
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:
The cglib dependency is only needed for the server side and for the
standalone wstools script. So it won't affect normal clients. If
possible we would like to make this change after the 1.0.0 release.
However, If you feel this is urgent, we can reschedule.
-Jason
> -Original Message-
> Fr
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-oracle-testsuite?log=log20060413134704
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:100: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/bui
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jbpm-mysql-testsuite?log=log20060413112713
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jbpm-db-matrix.xml:92: The following error occurred while executing this line: /home/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build
steve's call.
I don't like that we will have a jboss-specific build.
/max
So we need a hibernate version that has javassist set as the default
proxy factory/byte code manipulation framework. Can we do this for the
base release or does it need to be a jboss specific release? A container
issue
In terms of backward compatibility, I suppose a jboss-4.0.3SP1 hosted
client of a 4.0.4.GA hosted hibernate component needs to have a cglib
based proxy?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott M Stark
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 20
So we need a hibernate version that has javassist set as the default
proxy factory/byte code manipulation framework. Can we do this for the
base release or does it need to be a jboss specific release? A container
issue for reducing the client side dependencies to only javassist is:
http://jira.jbo
On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 18:58:25 +0200, Scott M Stark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
cglib should not be the default proxy framework as of the hibernate 3.2
release. I thought this was the case. Propagation of multiple libraries
doing the same thing needs to be cleaned up.
hibernate default is still
I don't see why. That is just creating a derivative work that if
redistributed under the original jar license should be fine.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 10:14 AM
> To: jboss-develo
Propagation of cglib to the client is a bad thing. Hibernate needed this
for some situations which is why I asked for javassit to be an alternate
proxy framework. We already have a javassist requirement for jbossretro.
I don't wan't wstools to also be pulling in cglib. What needs to be done
to have
Also, I guess JARJAR would have the same implication if we ever wanted
to do that.
Scott M Stark wrote:
The jbossall-client.jar needs to have only jboss lgpl content as well.
Throwing in asf licensed classes is a potential legal problem as what
are the redistribution terms of this jar? I have h
Yikes, that sucks. Just changed E-EJB3 recently to combine 3rd party
jars into one.
Scott M Stark wrote:
The jbossall-client.jar needs to have only jboss lgpl content as well.
Throwing in asf licensed classes is a potential legal problem as what
are the redistribution terms of this jar? I have
The jbossall-client.jar needs to have only jboss lgpl content as well.
Throwing in asf licensed classes is a potential legal problem as what
are the redistribution terms of this jar? I have had this argument with
Sacha to no resolution so we should not be introducing an unknown
complexity.
>
We also need cglib for wstools, should I just reference
server/default/lib, or should it be in client somewhere?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:jboss-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott M Stark
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 11:58 AM
> To: jboss-development@l
cglib should not be the default proxy framework as of the hibernate 3.2
release. I thought this was the case. Propagation of multiple libraries
doing the same thing needs to be cleaned up.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Bur
cglib should be in client as Hibernate needs them on serialization.
Jason T. Greene wrote:
jboss-head has cglib classes in the jbossall-client.jar, however,
jboss-4.0 does not, which one is correct?
Jason T. Greene
Developer - Web Services
JBoss Inc.
xxx
jboss-head has cglib classes in the jbossall-client.jar, however,
jboss-4.0 does not, which one is correct?
Jason T. Greene
Developer - Web Services
JBoss Inc.
---
This SF.Net email is sponsor
Only the tag:
cvs checkout -r JBoss_4_0_4_CR2 jboss-4.0.x
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Bill Burke
> Sent: Thursday, April 13, 2006 9:39 AM
> To: Jboss-Dev
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] how to checkout tagged 4.0.4cr2?
>
> Do you have
Do you have multiple -r or only the tag?
Meaning:
cvs checkout -r Branch_4_0 -r JBoss_4_0_4_CR2 jboss-4.0.x
or is this ok:
cvs checkout -r JBoss_4_0_4_CR2
Just want to make sure I'm
--
Bill Burke
Chief Architect
JBoss Inc.
---
This SF.Net
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-seam-testsuite?log=log20060413104240
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-seam-testsuite.xml:132: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wor
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.5?log=log20060413080830
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-remoting-testsuite-1.4?log=log20060413071954
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-jboss-remoting.xml:96: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/wo
View results here -> http://cruisecontrol.jboss.com/cc/buildresults/jboss-cache-testsuite?log=log20060413064237
TESTS FAILEDAnt Error Message: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/build-JBossCache.xml:86: The following error occurred while executing this line: /services/cruisecontrol/work/scripts/
34 matches
Mail list logo
