Well, I downloaded and compiled the Rabbit Hole release of JBoss today.
It's the first time I've built JBoss from scratch in about 6 months. At any
rate, I thought I'd reflect a little on a couple of things, so that I can
save people the 30 minutes I spent figuring it out.
-You need v1.4beta of
for build
What os are you using?
What module did you checkout?
--jason
On Fri, 31 Aug 2001, Dan - Blue Lotus Software wrote:
Well, I downloaded and compiled the Rabbit Hole release of JBoss today.
It's the first time I've built JBoss from scratch in about 6 months. At
any
rate, I thought I'd
,
Is ANT_HOME env property set ? Unset it and it will run by finding ant from
tools/
Vincent.
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Dan
- Blue Lotus Software
Envoyé : vendredi 31 août 2001 11:21
À : JBoss Dev
Objet : [JBoss-dev] requirements
The mail lists are going away real soon now. If you don't like the
volume, stick to the online forums, available at the JBoss website. They're
really nice.
-dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Steven Shaw
Sent: Wednesday, August 29,
Just a quick question. Is the preference to use ebXML for web services
instead of SOAP? In addition to SOAP? What about the efforts to wrap
IBM/Apache's SOAP stuff in MBeans?
The reason I ask is that I saw a technical demonstration of ebXML and the
XML-One conference in London about 5 months
?
Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dan -
Blue Lotus Software
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 5:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
Just a quick question. Is the preference to use
Lindfors
Sent: Wednesday, August 15, 2001 11:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] URGENCY? WSDL/UDDI/ebXML
On Wed, 15 Aug 2001, Dan - Blue Lotus Software wrote:
Just a quick question. Is the preference to use ebXML for web services
instead of SOAP?
No, ebXML uses SOAP as its
Sorry. Zipped files were still excessively large. You don't want to take a
600GB survey and turn it into a 2 TB data set. That wouldn't fit on
available disk space. And data access, consisting of uncompressing XML,
then parsing it, would be unacceptable for data volumes this big.
-dan
result sets that is
gzipped before transmission. This is accomplished by employing a servlet
filter that checks the content-length (and content-type) prior to
transmission. If it is over a particular length, we zip it. Browsers
automatically handle the de-compression.
From: Dan - Blue Lotus
Has anyone integrated them yet? Or are you suggesting a 2 VM implementation
of JBoss+Catalina?
-dan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
Rickard Öberg
Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2001 8:40 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [JBoss-dev]
Why not use the logging mbean? That would abstract out the logging
facility, so that you can use the Log4J logging mbean or some other logging
facility in the future. Of course, maybe that's exactly what you're asking
for.
I agree that stdout is not acceptable over the long run. Go for it!
11 matches
Mail list logo
