RE: [JBoss-dev] Rule Engine Integration Available

2001-04-19 Thread Lemoine David-dlemoi01
Hi, Thanks for your work on the Rules Engine David. I think there are many applications for rule-based systems. I once worked on a small expert system shell for the french equivalent of a mortgage company, although not in a J2EE environment. Rules were expressed in a proprietary language, some

RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-12 Thread Lemoine David-dlemoi01
IL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX Service Groups...??! As opposed to the current Configuration Service that already pases the MLet semantics to XML??? why? marc |-Original Message- |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On

RE: [JBoss-dev] Custom startup solved !? was: Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-11 Thread Lemoine David-dlemoi01
Hi, Whatever solution you decide on for this problem, I think it could be a good idea to replace the current MLet MBean-loader with Stacy's XML-based XMLet. Just my 2 irish cents, David. -Original Message- From: Stacy Curl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 11 April 2001 15:33 To: '[EMA

RE: [JBoss-dev] Nested JMX Service Groups...??!

2001-04-11 Thread Lemoine David-dlemoi01
Hi, Yes, the ServiceControl could use the MBeanServer.isInstanceOf(ObjectName objName, String className) before invoking the Service methods. What I find frustrating about JMX is that it seems difficult to implement a kind of "Service Provider" pattern as is commonly used in COM, for example (w