one issue I have in mind regarding multiple processor for a deployment is how
to coordinate the different processors between them.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855648#3855648
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=
in nukes-2.0 you can implement you own style of URL if you want.
I already have done something like /blah where blah is the portal name (usefull
when you have multiple portal per portal object container)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3855215#3
someone worked on importing a zip file in the database that contains a heirarchy of
files
isnt it what you want ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854056#3854056
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
Danny,
could you put that content in the wiki ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853841#3853841
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853841
can you add it ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853700#3853700
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3853700
---
This SF.Net email is sponsor
glad to help.
some updates :
I will commit more work in the core module soon after I have finished the first
hibernate integration.
Thomas is working on porting the template engine to JSP 2.0
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3853682#3853682
Re
ok, so two points,
first there is no support for user/group so far, that means no persistence.
so generating ddl is useless... but this is actually what I am working on
so what you can really use are the portlet features.
now the portlet container is developer we have started to migrate nukes t
Because the code does not apply translation to the built message. This need a fix.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851258#3851258
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851258
--
the problem of JBMail, it is that there is no development for now, so when HEAD is
going to move again, who is going to maintain that ?
Using javamail provides a solution that does need maintenance.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851024#385102
but I don't want to use JBMail and use javamail instead, do you get it ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851019#3851019
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851019
is it using JBMail or not ? we need for a solution which uses javamail to fetch emails
for a pop3box. The JBMail project is not active at the moment and it is not usable in
production.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851008#3851008
Reply to th
try to use the scheduler provided with JBoss :
http://docs.jboss.org/admin-devel/Chap10.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850881#3850881
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850881
---
it seems fine
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850426#3850426
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850426
---
This SF.net email is sponsored
good to hear about that. where is the state of your work ? I saw you both commited to
head and 1.1, can you report about it please ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850294#3850294
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&o
that is not very clear for me :-),
seriously if you want another display scheme, *just* develop a new ParserStack
different from this one. The parser stack framework has been designated for that
purpose. So you will not touch the current one and develop a new one that fit your
needs. Then make
acutally we should have pluggable support for different ways :
HTML
BBCode
Wiki
and reuse that portal wide, i.e use bbcode in news or in HTML module, etc
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850280#3850280
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss
user forum seems appropriate
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850271#3850271
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850271
---
This SF.net emai
we invest time for development in nukes 2.x and time for fixing component of nukes 1.x
which will be ported in 2.0
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850247#3850247
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
for the simple reason that some people want HTML to be usable in their forum.
HTML can be disable globally I think
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850248#3850248
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=rep
what I say, is that when you fix a bug in 1.1 you have to do it in head at the same
time otherwise the bug fix will be lost for future version, makes sense ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850227#3850227
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.o
These fixes should have been applied to head first then backported to 1.1
Now you have to port them to head or they will be lost.
Maintaining several branch is not easy all the time, nevertheless it is the
responsability of the developer to do it.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.o
I agree
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850223#3850223
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850223
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT
A simple jboss service that start/stop a timer based task.
This task fetch mails in a box through pop protocol with javamail.
Then it insert post in Nukes, it works already for jbossmail :
http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/jboss/nukes/jbmail/src/main/org/jboss/nukes/addons/jbmail/forumposter/
could you apply all the relevant fixes to HEAD branch as well ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850207#3850207
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850207
Actually the integration will be dropped since in favor of a pop box fetcher. BTW if
anyone wants to work on this it's not hard to do
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850201#3850201
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&
agree again
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850097#3850097
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850097
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by
I agree, only cosmetics should be done.
Please keep in mind that the modules are going to be ported to nukes 2 in the next 3
months are 1.1 wold probably be the last release.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850095#3850095
Reply to the post :
I take care of that module (which does not mean that nobody else cannot work on it).
Could you describe modifications you have done and you plan to do ?
What is the decent amount of work here ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850077#3850077
Re
no, comment it if you want in 1.1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850051#3850051
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3850051
---
This SF.net
nukes 1.1 works with jboss-3.2.3
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849879#3849879
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3849879
---
This SF.net
can you post what does not work for building ?
nukes 2.0 is a revamp of the portal infrastructure, for now it has only portal and
portlet capabilities and does not have all the modules builtin nukes 1.1 yet.
actually the next milestone is about porting nukes 1.1 modules to 2.0
I think it is not
you can do it with log4j.xml, afair :
set CONSOLE level as DEBUG
set category org.jboss to INFO
set category org.jboss.ejb.cmp.jdbc to DEBUG
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849753#3849753
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?m
should not it be : portletIcq != null && posterIcq.length() > 0 ?
"marndt" wrote : Hi.
| I do not know whether there is a bug tracking system set up for nukes, so I post
the bug here:
|
| BBModule.java, Revision: 1.67.2.3, line # 2882:
|
| if (posterIcq == null && posterIcq.length() >
this is EJBQL or JBossQL so it is portable accross different database since it is
compiled by CMP2 into the good SQL dialect by the engine.
"mlavergn" wrote : Ok, some SQL statements used in the EJB xdoclet defs extend beyond
SQL92 causing portability issues. To cite a particular example, from
yes, simply change it, it's head
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849683#3849683
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3849683
---
This SF.Net
you put the finger on it, if you set the value from within the MBean it will not be
persisted. The ModelMBean does not do interception of fields so it cannot be aware of
the change you made and the only way to force persistence is to traverse the JMX stack
by doing an explicit setAttribute().
V
you were modifying attributes within the module itself with somehting like : {
this.myfield = "some value"; } ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849358#3849358
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply
We have release Nukes 2.0 Developer Release and Nukes 1.1 RC3.
Nukes 2.0 DR features our portlet container implementation technology preview.
Nukes 1.1 RC3 features more modules and a new installer. Special thanks to jae and
thomas which have given a lot of work on this release.
You can downloa
did you call the constructor of the parent class with persistent = true ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849197#3849197
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3849197
---
You have to check first that something like : "INSERT INTO BLAH ('aaa',1,true) works,
i.e work with Statement.
Because if it does rely on PreparedStatement when you execute something your statement
looks like "INSERT INTO BLAH (?,?,?)" then the proprietary driver takes care of
marshalling the t
loading the data is a pain, because each database as a different way to express it.
boolean is expressed as "true|false" in hsqldb whereas it is expressed as 0/1 in mysql
for instance.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3849164#3849164
Reply to t
I thought that theute added it for the bb module attachments, waht nukes branch is it ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848707#3848707
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848707
-
yes it's up to the module to handle security how it wants.
in nukes 2 that will be done with any number of : and the check will be made against a
String[].
getSecLevel(new String[]{post.getId().toString(),"blah"});
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopi
there was 2 sections in PN because security rules are globally set that means you need
one :: to locate the component and one :: for security testing.
in Nukes since rules are defined per component you don't need to locate it and only
one :: is required
View the original post :
http://www.jbos
not yet, roy has worked on an new submission mode that need email confirmation though.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848206#3848206
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848206
--
1/ reuse the mail module facilities to send emails
2/ look at roy's code already checked in HEAD to avoid duplicates
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848242#3848242
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=re
1.1 and HEAD.
You have to use the URL for use registration :
/index.html?module=user&op=register
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848197#3848197
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848197
--
Yes you need to do that : go in the index module with index.html?module=index, here
you can managed the indices. Just remove the one for the module and then rebuild it
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848190#3848190
Reply to the post :
http://w
When one is an admin it can create users and edit their properties.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848191#3848191
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848191
-
It is done.
"thepriz" wrote : You know I created the download module and have not seen any bugs. I
may not have been keeping up on the forums.
|
| Also can I get recognized on the nukes front page for doing the conversion. I also
want to say the downloads module was not a straight conversio
It can be taken for a starting point. But it need to be reworked.
Indeed the trick here is to have the parser generate events, not directly output. Thus
it is possible to have several renderers.
The forum use this architecture :
Message -> Parser stack -> Renderer
Renderers are mainly to have
There is no written parser yet.
Actually the wiki parser must be integrated through the parser stack framework sitting
in the common module.
Then the HTML module must be capable to interpret some files with a specialized
content type "text/wiki" and render it. That would be an internal content
+1 for a real wiki module
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847899#3847899
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3847899
---
This SF.Net email i
I will look at it
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3847149#3847149
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3847149
---
This SF.Net email is sponso
"chamcha" wrote : "theute" wrote :
| | My modification is very simple and wouldn't change what you want do to. 15KB
is way too low, opening a file, writing in it and closing a file take too much time if
your file is 30KB you are doomed.
| |
| too much time? this is a file upload, not
I like this one too
"chasetec" wrote : You would have to mention this right after I got all the text moved
from the downloads module source code into the properties file. :)
|
| If we do this we should also include guidelines for naming in the templates as
well.
|
| Personally I like
it depends of the table type :-)
actually we use innoDB for website otherwise it can become corrupted with the
transaction volume we have.
we recommand using innoDB of course
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3846846#3846846
Reply to the post :
that is in xerces, did you setup the env variable JBOSS_HOME to a JBoss distribution ?
I can remove that dependency since I know a way to do it without.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3846723#3846723
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/in
the problem with deleting user is the coexistence with other modules, what should be
done with post that are related to that user for instance ?
we need to think about it. or think that a user related to something may not exist.
that's why there is enable/disable for a user.
now if you want to
"chasetec" wrote : Is RC3 the final release canadate for Nukes 1.1? When are we hoping
to ship 1.1?
|
Perhaps, everything seems fine except some bugs in the download module :-). Frankly I
think yes, and according to the number of bug you are fixing it will be ok. We will
wait for you to fix
impressive number of bug fixes.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845854#3845854
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3845854
---
SF.Net email
1.1RC3 has been tagged today in CVS, however this seems not to be fixed yet.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845649#3845649
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3845649
what do you want to do ? fix the download module bugs and submit new code ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845446#3845446
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3845446
-
please contribute
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3845095#3845095
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3845095
---
SF.Net email is sponsored b
there is the journal module which provide that but is a little bit crappy
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3844102#3844102
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3844102
---
I have created a news installer in branch 1.1 that is minimal but works. I have also
worked at minimizing the redundancy in the ddl files with an improved format of
setup.xml.
I think we should forget the idea of pure CMP because this is not possible to use it
to insert data in the database. It
This is how it is done today in Nukes 1.x through the JDBCPersistenceManager which is
an implementation of JBossMX persistence manager.
However that persistence is very simple and poor and does not allow for rich metadata
structure to be persisted.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.or
Well after all, I removed the tag and just let the branch tag since I will try to
simplify the DB feeding problem. I will try to tweak jae+sacha+noel xml/xsl/bsh
solution to have the default settings put in DB with a bash file. What's annoying with
the current in that the DB content format is de
write me an email please
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3843924#3843924
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3843924
---
This SF.Net email is
I have tagged the CVS for Nukes_1_1_0 and created a branch as well Nukes_Branch_1_1 to
put the fixes for that release.
Head has already some new features planned :
1/ Integration with JBossMail
2/ Attachment with mail
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewt
I will look at the compatibility issue this week, Nukes 1.x should work with
JBoss-3.2.6
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3843898#3843898
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3843898
---
I think the best would be to intercept before dispatching and remove the block not
needed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3843208#3843208
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3843208
-
you mean to have different views, for instance :
view #1 contains : forums, html block 1, html block 2
view #2 contains : news, html block 3
etc...
and the url could be something like : index.html?view=1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3843155
yes I spent some time to understand how these things interracts.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842998#3842998
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842998
this is related to the chain handling during the request. before being dispatched to
the target the request can be handled by the module :
HTTP Request -> Nukes Servlet -> Chain of handlers -> Target module
so it has the chance to intercept the request and provide some kind of work, for
instanc
Actually it depends if the company ships nukes as a product or not.
When a company write a custom modules :
1/ they have full copyright on it and can license it whatever they want
2/ if they distribute the component with Nukes, I think it must be licensed under GPL
View the original post :
http
is the block persisted in database ? that may overrdide the .xml setting
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842496#3842496
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842496
We have started our work on Nukes 2 and have started several documents which are a
tech specification and a roadmap. Of course these documents are in alpha stage.
They have been put in the CVS under : nukes-docs
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3
yes
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3841189#3841189
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3841189
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by Black Hat
you have to invalide the Resource cache, look at the HTML module which does that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3841182#3841182
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3841182
---
in commons fileupload or in nukes ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840967#3840967
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3840967
---
This SF.N
when you request /modules/toto/a/b/c.gif, the module toto will have a request to
return the resource "/a/b/c.gif".
so when you handle the resource for /a/b/c.gif you need to return that.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840629#3840629
Reply to
why not use the HTML module itself to store these files by using a dedicated folder
for that.
you can create insert files in the file tree by using the HTML commands that have been
introduced recently. Look at the FilePlugin for the HTML module which does that.
then you can access your content
look at the HTML module in the FilePlugin.java file and in the form related to that
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840325#3840325
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3840325
-
did your declare your form as such ?
|
| ...
|
|
| ...
|
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839958#3839958
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3839958
look at nukes/nukes/src/main/org/jboss/nukes/core/modules/html/plugins/FilePlugin.java
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839938#3839938
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3839938
--
as a user or programatically in a module you would have developed ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839927#3839927
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3839927
-
you should update the table by hand with an alter table statement.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839636#3839636
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3839636
--
not possible for now unless a lot of things are done
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3839546#3839546
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3839546
what kind ? usually the default encoding is different
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838547#3838547
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838547
---
BTW I tried the chinese examples given some time ago and it works well without using
XML char entities. So for these guys which had issues with that, I advise you to get a
snapshot from the CVS and it should be ok now.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewto
I have worked on that issue we had for a while. Basically when we change the response
content type, at the same time the request content type must be changed to the same
charset. Otherwise the textarea and textfield will not be decoded with the right
content type.
I had to change the compress f
your ear contains a web component (servlet probably) that serve the images to the
client. you should debug this servlet to see if it has access to this location or not
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838497#3838497
Reply to the post :
http://w
what is serving your images to the clients ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838479#3838479
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838479
---
still wanna use pure CMP :-) ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838424#3838424
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838424
---
This SF.Net em
you mean MBean service ? if yes you can use something like :
| ...
|
|
|
|
|
| ...
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838253#3838253
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
yes, you have to register it to the MBeanServer by another MBean service though.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838246#3838246
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838246
how are your 2 modules packaged : 2 sars in the same directory ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838127#3838127
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838127
what about the unique constraint we need to put on some fields ? is there a way to get
that ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3837875#3837875
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3837875
-
You are in EJB CMP 2.x land here. The implementor of these abstract method is the EJB
container itself. When it is deployed the container provide an implementation of all
the abstract get/set on the EJBs.
We advise you not to modify Nukes source code in that place but instead use the
"IMAGE" t
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo
