[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-26 Thread mkural
Hello Julien, So what happened in regards to contacting Brian? I heard from Brian that he's waiting for a response to his reply to you. -Mete http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827668#3827668";>View the original post http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-03 Thread cooper
done http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3824049#3824049";>View the original post http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3824049>Reply to the post --- SF.Net is sponsored by: Speed Start Your L

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-03 Thread mkural
Has anybody contacted Liferay yet? You can contact Brian from Liferay. http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3824045#3824045";>View the original post http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3824045>Reply to the post

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-02 Thread ivelin
As we posted on another thread, the liferay folks tried to join Nukes about a year ago, but were ignored at the time. A good candidate to talk to for JSR168 support. Ivelin http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823935#3823935";>View the original post http://www.jboss.org/

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-02 Thread mkural
anonymous wrote : we have jsr168 in the pipeline, kevin will implement ths jsr for us and will start that work very soon. That's great to hear :-) I have a simple suggestion. I think you should really consider using an already developed opensource portlet container such as Apache Pluto or eXo p

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-01 Thread cooper
we have jsr168 in the pipeline, kevin will implement ths jsr for us and will start that work very soon. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823745#3823745 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=382374

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-01 Thread hxp
FWIW -- I think JSR-168 support in Nukes will be cool someday, and is probably inevitable, but I hope Julien pays _zero_ attention to it till at least several weeks after he's gotten 1.0 out the door and gotten some much needed rest. Sorry to be blunt, but i detected a bit of tag-team pressure

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-03-01 Thread Giorgio42
That would be really cool! We are looking at both Nukes and Liferay, one for managing content, the other for providind a personalized view on the content. At the moment we would go for Liferay because of the JSR-168 support. All in all I think creating a PostNuke clone is aiming high enough for

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread cooper
18 months ago I was not there, so I don't know. I will get in touch to see if we can share interests here. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823347#3823347 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=382

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread ivelin
Sounds like the right thing to do. Julien? View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823323#3823323 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3823323 ---

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread mkural
By the way just to let you now that Brian from Liferay had emailed JBoss about this matter a year and half ago but JBoss did not respond. Maybe now is a good time to respond to him regarding joining efforts with Liferay. Perhaps Julien could get on that. View the original post : http://www.jbo

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread ivelin
I've posted a request on both the eXo and liferay maliling lists to think about joining Nukes. Let's see who will go first. Ivelin View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823273#3823273 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread cooper
I don't know yet, this is not bullet #1 on the list. I think implementing portlet is not that hard and I did not looked at Mickey's dog. View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823271#3823271 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread mkural
"cooper" wrote : we are thinking about doing Did you think about integrating with an already existing portlet container (not portal server, just the portlet container portion)? So you don't have to write a portlet container from scratch. Some open-source portlet containers out there: Pluto port

[JBoss-dev] [Nukes Development] - Re: JSR-168 compliance?

2004-02-27 Thread cooper
we are thinking about doing View the original post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3823236#3823236 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3823236 --- SF.Net is sponsor