. I'm going
to have to research that more.
Oh yeah, MQSeries also supports XA now :)
Regards,
Hiram
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2001 21:17:50 -0700 (PDT
but
|guarentees that
|a lost notification is not hanging the server.
|
|- Original Message -
|From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 4:27 PM
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
|
|
| I am still seeing a hang
I am testing the EJB 2.0 capabilities that have been implemented in some
of
the recent builds from CVS and I have come across this problem.
Using jbosscmp-jdbc.xml, I can deploy a simple app. It only has
a couple of fields, id (String) and label (String) as getters and
setters.
When I deploy
with the changes
that I recently made to the threading model that JBossMQ uses.
What's the easiest way you think I could reproduce the bug on my systems??
Regards,
Hiram
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Ok, I have verified that if the jbossmq.jar (and jbossmq-client.jar) from
the 2.1-BETA-Mar-26-2001 build are used that everything works fine. The
only thing I had
to the threading model that JBossMQ uses.
What's the easiest way you think I could reproduce the bug on my systems??
Regards,
Hiram
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001
: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
What was the problem... the diff is more or less the entire file. I am
curious, because I am still running into a hang, though it seems like it
might be MDB or SB related (not sure at the moment).
--jason
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 19:38:42 -0700 (PDT)
Ok, I have verified that if the jbossmq.jar (and jbossmq-client.jar) from
the 2.1-BETA-Mar-26-2001 build are used that everything works fine. The
only thing I
Yes, kill -QUIT is the correct way.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, July 14, 2001 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
Isn't it SIGQUIT... SIGHUP does not seem to produce a thread dump
I am still seeing a hang in EntityInstanceInterceptor =( I think I am
starting to understand the problem more, which is good. Unfortunately I
still don't have a good idea for which chunk of code is at fault.
In reference to the complicated scenario that I explained before, I might
be able to
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 4:27 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
I am still seeing a hang in EntityInstanceInterceptor =( I think I am
starting to understand the problem more, which is good. Unfortunately I
still don't have a good idea for which
I just re-ran this test with everything inside of the same vm and did not
run into any hangs. I also turned up the client poll rate to sleep only for
a second (instead of 1 minute). I am running even bigger tests now, still
all in the same vm. After that completes, if it completes I should
Do you have the timeout msg that is logged?
The first odd thing is that when it times out a message is logged, but the
thread still hangs. Should it be interrupted or something?
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I will have to reproduce it again... something went terribly wrong, the vm
spun and I had to reboot to regain control =(
--jason
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
Do you have the timeout msg that is logged?
The first odd thing is that when it times out a message is logged, but
Ok, I have verified that if the jbossmq.jar (and jbossmq-client.jar) from
the 2.1-BETA-Mar-26-2001 build are used that everything works fine. The
only thing I had to change was the router jboss.jcml changing INVM stuff to
RMI (which it was not even using) and remove the INVM stuff from
: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
What was the problem... the diff is more or less the entire file. I am
curious, because I am still running into a hang, though it seems like it
might be MDB or SB related (not sure at the moment).
--jason
one that looks interesting.
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
It is complicated
-
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 10:47 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
It is complicated.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
, 2001 7:04 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
I am not sure what you think is interesting, but from time to time, when
large jobs are being processed and I end up with a hang I see this every
time (note that the line numbers are off by one
What was the problem... the diff is more or less the entire file. I am
curious, because I am still running into a hang, though it seems like it
might be MDB or SB related (not sure at the moment).
--jason
On Wed, 11 Jul 2001, Scott M Stark wrote:
User: starksm
Date: 01/07/11 14:47:14
what are you running?
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
What was the problem... the diff is more or less the entire file. I am
curious, because I am
]]On Behalf Of Scott
M Stark
Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2001 1:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
Generate a thread dump using SIGHUP or Ctrl-\ on unix/linux or
Ctrl-Break on
win32.
This should be the first step to any deadlock/starvation
11, 2001 10:22 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
By garbage dumps do you mean invalid stack traces? Does this only
happen
with the Sun VM? I've been doing thread dumps on Linux + Hotspot and have
gotten results. Are the results sometimes bogus?
TIA,
Bill
to produce garbage dumps with HotSpot so turn it off using
the -classic
switch.
MDBs are involed in the lock unit test so what are you running?
- Original Message -
From: Jason Dillon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 8:57 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev
-dev] EntityInstanceInterceptor change
It is complicated.
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
25 matches
Mail list logo
