Title: Message
New to Jboss and
J2EE, but looks like we will be asked to support an app for our
department.
We are a Microsoft
shop and looking at the JBOSS document - http://www.jboss.org/overview.jsp - it appears that JBOSS only "talks to"
Oracle, DB2 and Postgres and not SQL Server
]'
Betreff: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000
New to Jboss and J2EE, but looks like we will be asked to support an app for
our department.
We are a Microsoft shop and looking at the JBOSS document -
http://www.jboss.org/overview.jsp - it appears that JBOSS only talks to
Oracle, DB2 and Postgres
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 8:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000
That's not true.
JBoss works with MS SQL Server 2000.
Kristian
--
Orientation in Objects GmbH
http://www.oio.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL
: [JBoss-dev] JBOSS and SQL Server 2000
That's not true.
JBoss works with MS SQL Server 2000.
Kristian
--
Orientation in Objects GmbH
http://www.oio.de
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
von Richard
Schultz
Gesendet: Donnerstag
Richard,
While I've not tried what you are asking about, JBoss (and any J2EE
server) will use a database via JDBC. There are two main JDBC drivers
for MS SQL Server 2000 that I would recommend. One is the DataDirect
JDBC driver (which is resold by Microsoft) and the Sprinta2000 or
Opta2000
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 02:49 PM, Brian Repko wrote:
And to the JBoss-dev list - jeez - way to shut down a newbie.
Here is someone in a Microsoft shop bringing in J2EE and
JBoss and not one message was helpful and a couple were downright
mean. No you are wrong and don't post here.
--- Dain Sundstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
I agree about the eclipse discussion, but it does
actually have a point
for development of the jboss server. It is always a
pain to get any
IDE to like our directory layout.
-dain
I would go so far as to say that it is a pain to get
The reason for all the modules is dependancies. This is why you can
run different deployments of JBoss. If everything were in a single
source tree, it would be almost impossible to run without everything.
-dain
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 04:00 PM, Dave Neuer wrote:
--- Dain
Early in 2.x development we had one module, as you seem to be recommending.
Personally I still think we would be developing 2.x level features without
the module structure.
Among the many advantages modules give you are the ability to know where a
feature ends, the ability to easily enforce and
Okay, I understand now... It was very clear
answer. Thanx. ;-)
- kimion -
- Original Message -
From:
David Maplesden
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:35
PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JBoss MS
SQL Server 2000
I
think you
10 matches
Mail list logo
