ott,
>
> marcf
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
> |M Stark
> |Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 4:03 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Package organization
> |
> |
> |I&#
yes clearly scott,
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Scott
|M Stark
|Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 4:03 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Package organization
|
|
|I'm not saying style is not important
ginal Message -
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 7:29 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Package organization
> You are right... what _was_ I thinking an
cott Stark
> Chief Technology Officer
> JBoss Group, LLC
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:33 PM
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] Pac
Message -
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 07, 2002 5:33 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] Package organization
> I have been putting off writing this email for a while... mostly because I
> am lazy.
>
> Any ways
Yes but...
While I agree with you that organization by function often makes more sense
that by type, and in particular in regards to the metadata mess, I think
there is one good reason to package by type, that applies to both the
deployers and the proxies:
Put interfaces to the outside world in
I have been putting off writing this email for a while... mostly because I
am lazy.
Any ways, I am concerned about the current trend for packaging which is
being employed in JBoss. By packaging I mean the way in which we organize
our classes into packages. I believe the current "package by t
