As somebody on /. might moderate INFORMATIVE.
Regards,
Adrian
__
View this jboss-dev thread in the online forums:
http://jboss.org/forums/thread.jsp?forum=66&thread=6792
___
Jboss-deve
FYI in J2SE 1.4:
Server-side Stack Traces Now Retained in Remote Exceptions
The RMI runtime implementation will now preserve the server-side stack trace
information of an exception that is thrown from a remote call, in addition to filling
in the client-side stack trace as it did previous
So you want to wrap any exception and propagate it to the client as a string and
deserialize it on the client.
This is client proxy work, not entirely transparent.
In JBoss 3.0 there will be a way to specify the "proxy factory" that returns the java
stubs you use, so I encourage you to make yo
Richard Kilgore wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 01:29:30PM +0100, Jung , Dr. Christoph wrote:
>
>>Hi Richard ...
>>
>>AFAIK, if you serialise an exception, the stacktrace is serialised,
too. So
>>I do not understand your point ...
>>
>>CGJ
>>
>
> No, this is a pretty well-known obsta
conf or jboss.jcml
> somewhere to have stack traces preserved, then in most cases,
> you probably won't have to do anything extra except restart
> jboss and run your test again to diagnose it.
>
> - rick
>
> > -----Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
> > V
it.
- rick
> -Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Richard Kilgore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 05:47
> An: JBoss Development
> Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Re: preserve exception backtrace for client
>
>
> Does anyone have any input on
Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Richard Kilgore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 9. Januar 2002 05:47
> An: JBoss Development
> Betreff: [JBoss-dev] Re: preserve exception backtrace for client
>
>
> Does anyone have any input on this? I can't s
-dev] Re: preserve exception backtrace for client
Does anyone have any input on this? I can't seem to get any responses on
this mailing list. Is what I have proposed ill-conceived, or out of turn or
something?
I need to do it for my own purposes, but thought it might be useful to
others as
Does anyone have any input on this? I can't seem to get any
responses on this mailing list. Is what I have proposed
ill-conceived, or out of turn or something?
I need to do it for my own purposes, but thought it might be
useful to others as well, since it seems like a pretty general
need, so I
