Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-24 Thread Jason Dillon
For the record, I was not planning on doing anythign about this just had a thought and wanted to know what others thought... just in case anyone is nervous that tomorrow there will be log4j metric logging everywhere... cause there won't. If JMX notifications work like they do in the previo

Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-24 Thread Jason Dillon
Looked at it... still don't understand how notifications can be used in an unobtrusive way as log4j can... but then again I don't fully understand the details of jmx notifications. Hrm... you mean something like: boolean metrics = support.isNotificationEnabled(MetricsNotification.INSTANCE); /

RE: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-24 Thread marc fleury
: Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j | | |> JMX notifications |> david | |Have a look at javax.management.NotificationFilterSupport | |Regards, |Adrian | |> |> On 2002.02.24 00:49:38 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: |> > I was thinking that logging would be less intrusive |

Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-24 Thread Peter Fagerlund
on 24-02-2 06.13, Jason Dillon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and > metrics? on 24-02-2 06.45, David Jencks at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I'd say no, this should be done through jmx not logging. I envision a new Statistics - Appen

Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-24 Thread Adrian Brock
> JMX notifications > david Have a look at javax.management.NotificationFilterSupport Regards, Adrian > > On 2002.02.24 00:49:38 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > > I was thinking that logging would be less intrusive > and easier for folks > > to enable/disable when then wish... though I agree > th

Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-24 Thread David Jencks
JMX notifications david On 2002.02.24 00:49:38 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > I was thinking that logging would be less intrusive and easier for folks > to enable/disable when then wish... though I agree that JMX would be > better. > > Can you think of a way to allow this to be enabled/disabled an

Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
I was thinking that logging would be less intrusive and easier for folks to enable/disable when then wish... though I agree that JMX would be better. Can you think of a way to allow this to be enabled/disabled and have little effect on performance (on or off) with JMX? --jason David Jencks w

Re: [JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-23 Thread David Jencks
On 2002.02.24 00:13:41 -0500 Jason Dillon wrote: > Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and > metrics? > I'd say no, this should be done through jmx not logging. david jencks > --jasin > > > ___ > Jboss-development maili

[JBoss-dev] Statistics/Metrics & Log4j

2002-02-23 Thread Jason Dillon
Any thoughts about adding a new priority/level for logging stats and metrics? --jasin ___ Jboss-development mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development