Hi Geeks
Based on an email of Dain I think the easiest
way to start is to use the Deployer's accept()
method and add additional test in the current
deployers there that only JBoss compliant
are deployed.
Now the Foe-Deployer can check it if not
compliant and then try to convert it to a
JBoss
Message -
From: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 3:13 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] WL Deployer, II
Hi Geeks
Based on an email of Dain I think the easiest
way to start is to use the Deployer's accept()
method and add additional test
Hi Scott
This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
create deployment units that contain all app server DDs and even
proprietary descriptors for their own use.
I don't think it would cause problems because I don't check if there
are foe DDs but if the archives misses
I'm saying that users are including jboss.xml, weblogic.xml,
sun-j2ee-ri.xml, ...
DDs in the deployment build because they want a one deployment unit works
with all servers package.
This is not going to work as many users already have stated they
create deployment units that contain all app
on 16-05-2 01.18, Scott M Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
because they want a one deployment unit works
with all servers package.
What can We be part of Invent here ?
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download
Hi Scott
For the sake of stability and easier to use the accept() is not
a good choice.
So I guess the only thing we can do is really to create a second
Main Deployer providing another domain of deployment.
Now I can add a Scanner on a different directory (like the Farm)
and use the
Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] WL Deployer, II
Hi Scott
For the sake of stability and easier to use the accept() is not
a good choice.
So I guess the only thing we can do is really
, LLC
- Original Message -
From: Andreas Schaefer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Scott M Stark [EMAIL PROTECTED];
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 5:41 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] WL Deployer, II
Hi Scott
For the sake of stability and easier
