well yes,
the idea is to move towards webservices as fast as we can.
I want to 'get something' that will work with XML. It will need to be
compliant down the road.
I want something in, ASAP, Open Source development, it can be as fancy as
you want down the road,
marcf
| Isn't this what
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Since people really want to help.
>
> Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX invocations?
>
> signature="..."/>
>
> will result in a
>
> server.invoke(new ObjectName(name), method, Object[] (from args), String[]
> (from signature));
Isn't this
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> |Might want to make it
> |
> |
> |
>
> yes good idea,
sorry but no:
allowing a nested tag
my 2c.
Trevor
___
Jboss-development mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listin
Hi Marc
First draft created and added to CVS. To test it please add the following to
jboss.jcml (or whatever it is).
To: "Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 7:22 PM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor
Hi
- Original Message -
From: "Jason Dillon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:49 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
> > Object[] invokeXML( Document );
>
> I am not sure that an array of objects
> Object[] invokeXML( Document );
I am not sure that an array of objects in this case would be very useful,
and would lead to a possible memory issue for large invokations in this
manner... in extereme cases that is.
Why clutter up the method name with an XML suffix when you are passing in
XML s
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 9:27 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
>
>
> |-Original Message-
> |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
> |Dillon
> |Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:19 PM
> |To: [
L.
I would like to do it, is tomorrow (Saturday) ok ?
Have fun - Andy
- Original Message -
From: "marc fleury" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 8:52 PM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
> |Might want to make it
&
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jason
|Dillon
|Sent: Friday, June 22, 2001 11:19 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] XML Adaptor to JMX
|
|
|Might also want to expose methods like:
|
| void invoke(Document)
|
|and
Might also want to expose methods like:
void invoke(Document)
and
Object invoke(Element)
Where the first would assume that there are more than one 's and
the second would assume that the passed in element is a and it
should return the value of server.invoke().
If no one else volunteers I
|Might want to make it
|
|
|
yes good idea,
| ...
|
|
|This should be fairly simply to do, what would be it used for?
just a proxy that understands XML messages in input, just an adaptor
very useful (you'll see)
marcf
|
|--jason
|
|
|On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
|
|> Since peo
Might want to make it
...
This should be fairly simply to do, what would be it used for?
--jason
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, marc fleury wrote:
> Since people really want to help.
>
> Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX invocations?
>
> signature="..."/>
>
> will result in a
>
> server
Since people really want to help.
Any taker on a simple XML Adaptor to JMX invocations?
will result in a
server.invoke(new ObjectName(name), method, Object[] (from args), String[]
(from signature));
any takers? that should be an hour job
org.jboss.jmx.XMLAdaptorMBean
org.jboss.jmx.XMLAdapt
13 matches
Mail list logo
