AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2003 23:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see

Re: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-24 Thread Stephen Coy
xdoclet stuff. The stuff is used by the jboss.net testsuite (and some web-service end-users out there). CGJ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Stephen Coy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 20. März 2003 23:45 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Hi

AW: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-24 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
: AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask Sorry about that. I sent the message twice, because the first attempt did not show up. If you look at the date of the second one, you will see that it was sent about 8 hours before the first one. It eventually arrived about 28 hours after I sent it. I

[JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-21 Thread Stephen Coy
Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in Branch_3_2, but I can't see any

Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-21 Thread David Jencks
At least the copy in HEAD is actually for xdoclet 1.2. When I migrated HEAD to xdoclet 1.2 I basically ignored the jboss.net xdoclet task. I'd say if the testsuite is OK, it is safe to ignore and let the jboss.net folks fix if there is a problem later. thanks david jencks On 2003.03.20 17:44

AW: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-21 Thread Jung , Dr. Christoph
] Gesendet: Freitag, 21. März 2003 13:46 An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Betreff: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask At least the copy in HEAD is actually for xdoclet 1.2. When I migrated HEAD to xdoclet 1.2 I basically ignored the jboss.net xdoclet task. I'd say if the testsuite is OK, it is safe

[JBoss-dev] jboss.net xdoclet subtask

2003-03-21 Thread Stephen Coy
Hi, Is it reasonable to assume that the jboss.net xdoclet subtask that was being worked on nearly a year ago is currently not used in anger anywhere? I can see a couple of flavours of the code (in org.jboss.net.xdoclet and also thirdparty/xdoclet/jboss.net) in Branch_3_2, but I can't see any