Thanks
- Original Message -
From: "Scott M Stark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 8:08 PM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_2.dtd updated
> Its there, look again after doing an update:
>
> metadata 776>pwd
&g
ECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 9:28 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_2.dtd updated
> I'll try to be more precise. In order to interact with Y, X must use a
> reference to Y. This reference determines the protocol over which the
> interact
fficer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Betteridge" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 10:22 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_2.dtd updated
> Can't seem to find jboss_3_2.dt
>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 1:00 AM
Subject: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_2.dtd updated
> The jboss_3_2.dtd was way out of date with respect to the container
> invoker configuration so I updated it and checked it in. Take a look
> at this and see if there ar
I'll try to be more precise. In order to interact with Y, X must use a
reference to Y. This reference determines the protocol over which the
interaction will take place.
If X calls Y for its own consumption, without obtaining from Y any
reference that may be returned to the caller of X, then X i
05, 2003 6:23 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_2.dtd updated
> A protocol is associated with a reference (proxy) factory. My previous
> message stressed the protocol (invoker) rather than the proxy factory.
> The crucial thing is the reference factory, i.e., whether a remote
> r
Boss Group, LLC
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:01 PM
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss
;>Behalf Of Francisco Reverbel
>>Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2003 6:02 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] jboss_3_2.dtd updated
>>
>>
>>On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Scott M Stark wrote:
>>
>>> The jboss_3_2.dt
imized RMI?
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
- Original Message -
From: "Francisco Reverbel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 04, 2003 10:01
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Scott M Stark wrote:
> The jboss_3_2.dtd was way out of date with respect to the container
> invoker configuration so I updated it and checked it in. Take a look
> at this and see if there are other missing elements or elements that
> should be dropped.
>
> One construct that
The jboss_3_2.dtd was way out of date with respect to the container
invoker configuration so I updated it and checked it in. Take a look
at this and see if there are other missing elements or elements that
should be dropped.
One construct that I don't understand in the invoker-bindings/invoker
ele
11 matches
Mail list logo
