t; fleury
|> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:52 PM
|> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
|>
|>
|> so
|>
|>
|>
|> is the create the same? cannot be transactional??? or just remove?
|>
|> having problems with the new code
ments SessionSynchronization.
Regards,
Bill
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:52 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>
>
> so
>
&g
|Hi Marc,
|
|I can't take a chill pill as I am signing off for several hours and
|possibly the evening, to go over my sister's house for dinner. #1 is
|almost correct: you can call remove on a transactional stateful
|session bean--you just can't do it when it is participating in a
|transaction. Th
On 3 Jul 01, at 16:08, marc fleury wrote:
Hi Marc,
I can't take a chill pill as I am signing off for several hours and
possibly the evening, to go over my sister's house for dinner. #1 is
almost correct: you can call remove on a transactional stateful
session bean--you just can't do it when i
]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
|
|
|chill pill bill...
|
|there is more fire coming, although when we volley back and forth like this
|you must account for delivery lag,
|
|so everyone take a "chill pill bill" for 15 mins, when you come back we are
|all synchronized :)
|
|
ctorial at least to
me (but I didnt' take the chill pill and I want to finish the commits)
marcf
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Bill
|Burke
|Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:09 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remov
Yes, remove is not transactional, go ahead and remove the bean
from the cache. But I disagree with the following:
> |I agree with Bill - removing everything involved in the rolled-back
> |transaction from the cache is a must.
> |
> |-danch
> |
> |Bill Burke wrote:
> |
> |> Nope, with the old cod
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 4:08 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>
>
> |Just looked at the spec. You c
Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>
>
> fair enough, by popular demand
>
> remove() is not a transactional operation then,
>
> you call it? the stateful bean is gone
|>
|> |
|> |Bill
|> |
|> |> -Original Message-
|> |> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> |> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
|Behalf Of marc
|> |> fleury
|> |> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:57 PM
|> |> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|> |>
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> >>fleury
> >>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:57 PM
> >>To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> >>Subject: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
> >>
> >>
> >>as I wrap up the stuff, sanity check
> >
3:35 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
|
|
|I agree with Bill - removing everything involved in the rolled-back
|transaction from the cache is a must.
|
|-danch
|
|Bill Burke wrote:
|
|> Nope, with the old code, B would be removed from the cache when
|b.rem
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 3:30 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>
>
>
> |Nope, with the old code, B would be removed from the cache when
> b.remove()
> |was called even if it was invok
uiv to
setValid(false)) but for the stateful...?
marcf
|
|Bill
|
|> -Original Message-
|> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
|> fleury
|> Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:57 PM
|> To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
|> Subj
t;
>
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
>>fleury
>>Sent: Tuesday, July 03, 2001 2:57 PM
>>To: Jboss-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
>>Subject: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>&g
-Development@Lists. Sourceforge. Net
> Subject: [JBoss-dev] remove transactional
>
>
> as I wrap up the stuff, sanity check
>
> bean a and bean b
>
> a starts transaction and calls b.remove() and then rolls back
>
> b is still there in cache right?
>
> marcf
>
&
as I wrap up the stuff, sanity check
bean a and bean b
a starts transaction and calls b.remove() and then rolls back
b is still there in cache right?
marcf
_
Marc Fleury, Ph.D
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
___
Jboss-develop
17 matches
Mail list logo
