Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 12:45 AM, David Jencks wrote: On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 09:36 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 07:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Wow, I had no idea it was this compli

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-27 Thread David Jencks
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 12:47 AM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 09:36 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 07:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Wow, I had no idea it was this complicated. Anyway the real problem is a Dynamic MBean has a setAttr

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 09:36 PM, David Jencks wrote: On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 07:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Wow, I had no idea it was this complicated. Anyway the real problem is a Dynamic MBean has a setAttributes method to group together an entire set of attribute changes

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-27 Thread David Jencks
On Monday, January 27, 2003, at 07:39 PM, Dain Sundstrom wrote: Wow, I had no idea it was this complicated. Anyway the real problem is a Dynamic MBean has a setAttributes method to group together an entire set of attribute changes in one operator, but when we go to standard mbeans we lose tha

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
Wow, I had no idea it was this complicated. Anyway the real problem is a Dynamic MBean has a setAttributes method to group together an entire set of attribute changes in one operator, but when we go to standard mbeans we lose that concept because we only have a bunch of setters. That sucks. W

RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-25 Thread Matt Munz
ssage- From: David Jencks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 9:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service Yes, that's the idea. It goes

RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-25 Thread Sacha Labourey
> Yes, that's the idea. It goes like this when jboss instantiates an > mbean from a *-service.xml file: > > (create mbean) > state: instantiated > (set attributes) > state: configured > (call create method) ~(call destroy method) > state: created > (call start method) ~(call stop method) > state:

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread David Jencks
Yes, that's the idea. It goes like this when jboss instantiates an mbean from a *-service.xml file: (create mbean) state: instantiated (set attributes) state: configured (call create method) ~(call destroy method) state: created (call start method) ~(call stop method) state: started where the

RE: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Munz
David, We are miscommunicating. >In all the mbeans I have written and seen in jboss, aside from >egregious bugs, if setting an attribute doesn't have an immediate >effect, it does have the desired effect if you run through the service >lifecyc

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread David Jencks
On Friday, January 24, 2003, at 03:23 PM, Matt Munz wrote: this one didn't make it either... -Original Message- From: Matt Munz Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service David,

Re: FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread David Jencks
While I'm sure what you are proposing can be made to work, it would be a really big redesign of how mbeans are thought of in jboss. Something you can do today, in just a few minutes, and will make your proposal work with jboss as it is currently written is to use the service lifecycle methods

FW: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service

2003-01-24 Thread Matt Munz
this one didn't make it either... -Original Message- From: Matt Munz Sent: Fri 1/24/2003 12:18 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] [ jboss-Change Notes-672538 ] Master Configuration Service