RE: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-29 Thread Sacha Labourey
OK, you're the chief, I trust you! > -Message d'origine- > De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Dain > Sundstrom > Envoye : mercredi, 29 janvier 2003 18:49 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev a

Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-29 Thread Dain Sundstrom
8:35 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments Sacha, What you suggest would require rewriting the byte code generator, which I didn't write. Currently all the implementation of the abstract methods does is call an invocation handler. I do really

RE: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-29 Thread Sacha Labourey
nvoye : mercredi, 29 janvier 2003 18:35 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments > > > Sacha, > > What you suggest would require rewriting the byte code generator, which > I didn't write. Currently all the implementation of

Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-29 Thread Dain Sundstrom
CTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Dain Sundstrom Envoye : mardi, 28 janvier 2003 01:56 A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments I never really liked this idea. I think you should provide a concrete setPostalCode (String code) method and if t

RE: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-28 Thread Sacha Labourey
PROTECTED]]De la part de Dain > Sundstrom > Envoye : mardi, 28 janvier 2003 01:56 > A : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments > > > I never really liked this idea. I think you should provide a concrete > setPostalCode (String code)

Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-28 Thread Dain Sundstrom
On Tuesday, January 28, 2003, at 01:52 AM, Themba Mbatha wrote: I never really liked this idea. By this I'm assuming you are referring to the JavaBean listener interfaces (PropertyChangeListener and PropertyVetoChangeListener) as a possible solution. No, that would be super cool. I just don'

Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-28 Thread Themba Mbatha
> I never really liked this idea. By this I'm assuming you are referring to the JavaBean listener interfaces (PropertyChangeListener and PropertyVetoChangeListener) as a possible solution. > I think you should provide a concrete > setPostalCode (String code) method and if the data is valid you wo

Re: [JBoss-dev] Feature request, dev assignments

2003-01-27 Thread Dain Sundstrom
I never really liked this idea. I think you should provide a concrete setPostalCode (String code) method and if the data is valid you would call setPostalCodeField (String code) or setPostalCode_(String code). I think this type of validation is part of the business logic. Alternatively, ther