Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-08-01 Thread Scott M Stark
Right now we do have a number of examples of this in the form of thread local data, typically accessed via a singleton type of accessor. Converting this to a context with different scopes of data, much like the servlet attribute scoping would clean up the code. There are contexts in which this dat

RE: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-08-01 Thread Sacha Labourey
ceptors can be > > > shared/stateless. > > > > > > The method permission gets into the InvocationContext via a > > > "ContainerPlugin". The plugins have a life-cycle and the MBeanInvoker > > > is told about these at deployment. > > > > >

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-08-01 Thread Adrian Brock
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors >specifically >Date: Thu, 1 Aug 2002 10:03:02 -0400 > >I don't understand the "container plugin" concept nor what it is

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-08-01 Thread Adrian Brock
ill probably need a security interceptor, you could very quickly get into recursive death if the MBeanInvokers were managed by MBeanInvokers :-) Regards, Adrian >From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Inter

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-08-01 Thread Adrian Brock
it? It doesn't make sense with shared/stateless interceptors. Regards, Adrian >From: David Jencks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors >specifically >Date: Wed, 31

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-07-31 Thread Scott M Stark
PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically > You're taking away all my fun;-))) > > OK, I won't commit anything if I happen to write it. Back to fixing bugs. > > david --- This sf.

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-07-31 Thread David Jencks
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:54 PM > Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors > specifically > > > > Well, I'd like to work on it, like, now, since I need some parts of > this > to > > make xsl

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-07-31 Thread Scott M Stark
- From: "David Jencks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2002 1:54 PM Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically > Well, I'd like to work on it, like, now, since I need some parts of this to >

RE: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-07-31 Thread Sacha Labourey
[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors > specifically > > > Well, I'd like to work on it, like, now, since I need some parts > of this to > make xsl based deployments work better. > > I think it will be workable on

Re: [JBoss-dev] Interceptors for MBeans... TX interceptors specifically

2002-07-31 Thread David Jencks
Well, I'd like to work on it, like, now, since I need some parts of this to make xsl based deployments work better. I think it will be workable only for xmbeans or other model mbeans. Steps I forsee: 1. Make mbean interceptor stacks generated by other interceptor stack factory mbeans; intercept