marc fleury wrote:
>
> > COMPLETION_MAYBE is when you are actually in the invocation
> > of the bean and you really don't know how far the invocation
> > got.(for clustering don't failover invocation because you may
> > be in inconsistent state.)
>
> Give me an example of "being in the bean and
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
fleury
Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 10:09 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] InvocationResponse and Exceptions
> COMPLETION_MAYBE is when you are actually in the invocation
> of the bean and you really don't know
gt; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > marc fleury
> > Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:59 AM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] InvocationResponse and Exceptions
> >
> >
> > Completion maybe??
02 11:51 AM
>>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Subject: Re: [JBoss-dev] InvocationResponse and Exceptions
>>
>>
>>Cool. When you get this done, I'd like to add some code to send the
>>stacktrace for remote exceptions on JDK 1.3.
>>
>>-dain
>>
&g
invocation(definately failover)
COMPLETION_YES means that everything is a ok.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc
> fleury
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 2:59 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] In
Completion maybe???
What would it be and why is it interesting?
KISS,
Marcf
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
> Behalf Of Dain Sundstrom
> Sent: Saturday, July 06, 2002 11:51 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Su
Cool. When you get this done, I'd like to add some code to send the
stacktrace for remote exceptions on JDK 1.3.
-dain
Bill Burke wrote:
> As you might already now, I'm wrapping the return value from an invocation
> in a response object. This is so that the server side can communicate back
>
