Hi!
Ken Jenks wrote:
> And for the rest of the jBoss team, does jBoss use the Sun version of the
> EJB 1.1 (J2EE 1.2) or the JDMK (JMX) libraries, or does it create its own,
> according to the spec?
Well, there are a couple of different stories here depending on who you
talk to.
Here's mine :-
Ken Jenks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>Jorgen Thelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>
>>I now work for Orbware
>>- one of the 18 commercial J2EE licensees, and the first licensee
>>in the U.K. The above licensing situation was one of the primary
>>factors that influenced Orbware's decision to become a
Jorgen Thelin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
>I now work for Orbware
>- one of the 18 commercial J2EE licensees, and the first licensee
>in the U.K. The above licensing situation was one of the primary
>factors that influenced Orbware's decision to become a J2EE licensee
>-- we are committed to makin
Joe Shevland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But any modifications/enhancements they make to the jBoss source
> code *must* be made available to the jBoss community under the GPL,
> is that correct?
I'm afraid it's probably much more complex than just that.
While ejip.net's use of jboss softw
