Robert Schulz wrote:
>If you have the time - could you try resin (www.caucho.com)?
>They claim to be pretty fast and their servlet container
>works very well.
Yes, i will...
But first it seem that i have to rethink my test. There are a lot of things which have
influence to the performanc
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 November 2000 3:19
> To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat - Benchmark
>
> Ok, i tested Jetty and Tomcat in the same environment. Here
> are my results.
>
> ...
Stefan,
Do you know if the MS W
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Röper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 November 2000 3:19
> To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat - Benchmark
>
> Ok, i tested Jetty and Tomcat in the same environment. Here
> are my
; To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat - Benchmark
>
>
> Ok, i tested Jetty and Tomcat in the same environment. Here
> are my results.
>
> Server Configuration:
> Pentium Pro 200MHz
> RAM 64 MB
> IDE Drive
> Red Hat Linux 7.0
>
>
ECTED]]Im Auftrag von Julian Gosnell
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2000 11:16
An: jBoss
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
Jetty has a super-fast implementation to serve any
kind of page - static, dynamic (CGI, Servlet, JSP,
WebApp). Furthermore, becau
Aha - now I understand !
Sounds like a great idea.
I'm away for 8 or 9 days starting at the weekend (bad timing) so I wn't be able
to help much, but you really should get in touch with Greg about this. I'm sure
he'll be full of suggestions
Let me know if there's anything I can do.
Jules
|And it was only a subset of our stuff (this was a proof-of-concept:
|I'm trying to migrate our business objects to stateless session beans,
|I think it is the easiest way to go to EJB world since we currently
|have all DB access done via stateless server objects which are
|ver
Hi,
> > I just checked and we have more than 300 business
> > objects so when I have everything moved to EJB/jBoss environment
we'll
> > have 300 beans. Add web pages to that and I think that
> > we will be looking at ~10 Mb .ear file - should this be split up ?
>
> I think for dev
Hey
Ari Suutari wrote:
> And it was only a subset of our stuff (this was a proof-of-concept:
> I'm trying to migrate our business objects to stateless session beans,
> I think it is the easiest way to go to EJB world since we currently
> have all DB access done via stateless serve
> |
> |Btw, .ear deployment seems to be very slow on
> |both ones - I had .ear file of 4.8 Mb and it takes
>
> that is one BIG file buddy...
>
> marc
>
And it was only a subset of our stuff (this was a proof-of-concept:
I'm trying to migrate our business objects to stateless session b
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Wilkins
|Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:01 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [Fwd: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat]
|
|
|
|
|Marc,
|
|Can you forward this to the list
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ari Suutari
|Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 12:25 AM
|To: jBoss
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Jetty sure is a lot faster than Tomcat. I just ran a test
|with a JSP page
lf a dozen of the other.
>
> Bill Pfeiffer
>
> - Original Message -
> From: Michael G. Drew
> To: jBoss
> Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 4:26 PM
> Subject: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
>
>
> I would like to design my web apps so that I can
&g
; marc
> >
> > |-Original Message-
> > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Gosnell
> > |Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
> > |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty
|Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
> |
> |
> |Guys, Guys,
> |
> |Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
> |contrib/jetty in CVS
> |
> |Any questions - I'll be pleased to
PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Gosnell
|Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
|
|
|Guys, Guys,
|
|Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
|contrib/jetty in CVS
|
|Any questions - I'll be pleas
sage-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Gosnell
|Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
|
|
|Guys, Guys,
|
|Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
|contrib/jetty in CVS
|
|Any ques
Guys, Guys,
Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
contrib/jetty in CVS
Any questions - I'll be pleased to answer them.
As for pros/cons - Do you want just a Servlet
Container, or the whole lot ?
As for the port number - tell Jetty to use whatever
port[s] you want in it's xml confi
, 2000 3:35 PMTo:
jBossSubject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
Michael,
Please post your numbers when you have them,
this
is very very very very interesting.
marc
PS:
The servlet container war has begun let the games
begin
-Original
On Nov 15, Bill Pfeiffer quoth:
> If your plan is to just use your servlet container to serve up http,
> why not use tomcat without apache. The benefit of running apache is
> that it serves static pages fast (I'm sure there are others). If
> everything is going to come out of the servlet contai
.
DrewSent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 1:26 PMTo:
jBossSubject: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
I would like to
design my web apps so that I can access them directy through a normal http
url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp
NOT: www.myserver.com:8080/myapp.
I know I can do this by
000 4:26
PM
Subject: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs
Tomcat
I would like to
design my web apps so that I can access them directy through a normal http
url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp
NOT: www.myserver.com:8080/myapp.
I know I can do this by getting tomcat and apache working tog
"Michael G. Drew" wrote:
> I would like to design my web apps so that I can access them directy through a
>normal http url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp NOT: www.myserver.com:8080/myapp.
>I know I can do this by getting tomcat and apache working together, but when I
>introduce jBoss in th
Hi,
> "Michael G. Drew" wrote:
>
> I would like to design my web apps so that I can access them directy
> through a normal http url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp NOT:
> www.myserver.com:8080/myapp. I know I can do this by getting tomcat
> and apache working together, but when I introduce jB
I would like to
design my web apps so that I can access them directy through a normal http
url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp
NOT: www.myserver.com:8080/myapp.
I know I can do this by getting tomcat and apache working together, but when I
introduce jBoss in the mix, I haven't been able
25 matches
Mail list logo
