Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Muness Al-Rubaie
ctional > settings of the EJB. > > - Original Message - > From: "James Cook" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "JBoss-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 3:14 PM > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging > > > I have yet

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Scott M Stark
ROTECTED]> To: "JBoss-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 3:14 PM Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging > I have yet to see an EJB container that *prevents* you from using File I/O. The > spec is very short-sighted (or perhaps it is worded too restrictivly).

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread James Cook
could always email the log messages. :) jim - Original Message - From: "Jason Mawdsley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "JBoss-User" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2001 5:18 PM Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging > > > > If you write to Syst

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Dan Christopherson
On Fri, 16 Mar 2001, Tom Cook wrote: > On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Jason Mawdsley wrote: > > > > > > If you write to System.out, it does show up in the logs (I believe at > > Info > > > > > level?). > > > > > > > Obviously, this isn't good enough for a lot of purposes. Have you > > looked > > > > > at

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Tom Cook
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Jason Mawdsley wrote: > > > > If you write to System.out, it does show up in the logs (I believe at > Info > > > > level?). > > > > > Obviously, this isn't good enough for a lot of purposes. Have you > looked > > > > at log4j? > > From looking at log4j I don't think I can u

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Jason Mawdsley
> > > If you write to System.out, it does show up in the logs (I believe at Info > > > level?). > > > Obviously, this isn't good enough for a lot of purposes. Have you looked > > > at log4j? >From looking at log4j I don't think I can use it. My beans have to work in various app servers, hence I

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Dan Christopherson
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Jason Mawdsley wrote: > > > It seems that the console, file, and GUI logging are only for JBoss > Server > > > logging, not for EJBs > > > If you write to System.out, it does show up in the logs (I believe at Info > > level?). > > > Obviously, this isn't good enough for a l

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Jason Mawdsley
> > It seems that the console, file, and GUI logging are only for JBoss Server > > logging, not for EJBs > If you write to System.out, it does show up in the logs (I believe at Info > level?). > Obviously, this isn't good enough for a lot of purposes. Have you looked > at log4j? I have heard of

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Dan Christopherson
On Thu, 15 Mar 2001, Jason Mawdsley wrote: > I have some questions with which I could not find answers for in the > archives. > > Weblogic has a logging API that you use to log to Weblogic. Does JBoss have > the equivant? > > It seems that the console, file, and GUI logging are only for JBoss

[jBoss-User] Logging

2001-03-15 Thread Jason Mawdsley
I have some questions with which I could not find answers for in the archives. Weblogic has a logging API that you use to log to Weblogic. Does JBoss have the equivant? It seems that the console, file, and GUI logging are only for JBoss Server logging, not for EJBs Thanks Jaso

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements

2001-01-19 Thread Mukul Kumar
: jBoss Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements Hi, > is it possible to make jBoss print the SQL generated for a CMP-bean? > I have tried setting true in standardjboss.xml, > and also true in jboss.cml, > without success. Have you set up to printout Debug Messages in Co

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements

2001-01-19 Thread Kardos, Andreas, MDC7752
No need to recompile jBoss. "debug" can be set from a deployed bean. Andreas -Original Message- From: Kimpton,C (Chris) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Freitag, 19. Januar 2001 10:10 To: 'jBoss' Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements Hi, > is it

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements

2001-01-19 Thread Ingo Bruell
Hi, > is it possible to make jBoss print the SQL generated for a CMP-bean? > I have tried setting true in standardjboss.xml, > and also true in jboss.cml, > without success. Have you set up to printout Debug Messages in ConsoleLogging (jboss.conf)? CU --- Ingo Bruell OBL GmbH ([EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements

2001-01-19 Thread Kimpton,C (Chris)
Hi, > is it possible to make jBoss print the SQL generated for a CMP-bean? > I have tried setting true in > standardjboss.xml, > and also true in > jboss.cml, > without success. READ THE MAILING LIST ARCHIVE... and you will find Tobias said You have to compile JBoss yourself (get it fro

[jBoss-User] Logging of SQL-statements

2001-01-19 Thread Erik G. Dybdahl
Hi, is it possible to make jBoss print the SQL generated for a CMP-bean? I have tried setting true in standardjboss.xml, and also true in jboss.cml, without success. erik ___ Do You Yahoo!? Del dine bilder med andre på http://no.photos.yahoo.co

RE: [jBoss-User] logging passivation

2000-12-12 Thread Bordet, Simone
:53 > To: 'jBoss' > Subject: [jBoss-User] logging passivation > > > i have jboss in test run before production and have a log file > with 4mb (got 400mb last week) where 90% is the following > > [Bean Cache] Passivated overaged bean mediaminer.Story with i

[jBoss-User] logging passivation

2000-12-12 Thread ZZ-Coz
i have jboss in test run before production and have a log file with 4mb (got 400mb last week) where 90% is the following [Bean Cache] Passivated overaged bean mediaminer.Story with id = BR_20001119_2100_Rundschau_Magazin - 1 got an idea? markus --

[jBoss-User] Logging Security

2000-12-07 Thread Kenworthy, Edward
Is there anyway I can log what the server does with security ? It would be useful (given my current difficulties) if I could get it to report something like: [JAAS] Access Denied: subject: EdwardKenworthy principal/role: Customer, FinancialAdvisor tried to access FinancialAdvisor::setPay(Money).

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Ingo Bruell
Hi, >> >> see posting "Re: Re[2]: [jBoss-User] ejbActivate". >> >> >I.e. fixed? >> >> What you mean ? > > Since you got the activation problem fixed, then this problem is also > fixed? Yes, was the same error ... CU --- Ingo Bruell OBL GmbH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hude (Oldenburg) Germany --

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hi! Ingo Bruell wrote: > >> see posting "Re: Re[2]: [jBoss-User] ejbActivate". > > >I.e. fixed? > > What you mean ? Since you got the activation problem fixed, then this problem is also fixed? /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- -

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Ingo Bruell
Hi Rickard, >> >> I have tried to printout some information to Console, but nothing was >> shown. >> >> Is there a special flag to enable this. Or must I redirect my output >> >> somwhere ? >> >> >Using System.out or System.err should be enough. Nothing shows? >> >> see posting "Re: Re[2]: [jBo

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Rickard Öberg
Ingo Bruell wrote: > >> I have tried to printout some information to Console, but nothing was > shown. > >> Is there a special flag to enable this. Or must I redirect my output > >> somwhere ? > > >Using System.out or System.err should be enough. Nothing shows? > > see posting "Re: Re[2]: [jBoss

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Ingo Bruell
Hi Rickard, >> I have tried to printout some information to Console, but nothing was shown. >> Is there a special flag to enable this. Or must I redirect my output >> somwhere ? >Using System.out or System.err should be enough. Nothing shows? see posting "Re: Re[2]: [jBoss-User] ejbActivate".

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Rickard Öberg
Ingo Bruell wrote: > I have tried to printout some information to Console, but nothing was shown. > Is there a special flag to enable this. Or must I redirect my output > somwhere ? Using System.out or System.err should be enough. Nothing shows? /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg Email: [EMAIL PROTECT

[jBoss-User] Logging

2000-12-06 Thread Ingo Bruell
Hi, I have tried to printout some information to Console, but nothing was shown. Is there a special flag to enable this. Or must I redirect my output somwhere ? CU --- Ingo Bruell OBL GmbH ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Hude (Oldenburg) Germany -- --

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging from beans

2000-10-24 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hi! Jay Walters wrote: > What is the preferred way to log output from beans within jBoss. This > doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. I see some stuff about logging > levels in the docs, but what objects and methods do I use to put it there? You can use System.out and System.err if you w

[jBoss-User] Logging from beans

2000-10-24 Thread Jay Walters
What is the preferred way to log output from beans within jBoss. This doesn't appear to be documented anywhere. I see some stuff about logging levels in the docs, but what objects and methods do I use to put it there? Cheers -- -- T

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-26 Thread John D. McDonald
rday, August 26, 2000 1:39 AM Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging >Justin Forder wrote: >> >> To get rid of the JAWS trace, I'm afraid you need to alter a compile- >> time flag and recompile. It's the debug flag in JDBCCommand.java. > >Thanks for the hint, Justin (

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Justin Forder
Vadim You are absolutely right, and Rickard pointed out earlier that choice by source is implemented in the file logging in jBoss, and not in the console logging. He said he would fix this. regards Justin In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Vadim Tkachenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >According t

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Ole Husgaard
Sebastien Alborini wrote: > I think the logging process is too complex (four levels, Information > Error Debug Warning), and few people use this complexity in jboss code. > I would propose only 2 levels: > - Information-Error always printed > - Debug-Warning printed only if debug flag is true, thi

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Rob Castaneda
Oops! I'm a goose. should have been www.log4j.org -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Castaneda Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 12:41 PM To: jBoss Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Logging what about log4java? www.log4java.org They

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Jeremiah Johnson
Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging Hi! Carlos Valiente wrote: > > Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? Check /conf/jboss.conf. First parameter is what to let through the filter. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.telkel.com http://

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Vadim Tkachenko
According to Justin Forder: > Sebastien Alborini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Hi, > > > >I think the logging process is too complex (four levels, Information > >Error Debug Warning), and few people use this complexity in jboss code. > >I would propose only 2 levels: > >- Information-Error alwa

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Rob Castaneda
-Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 12:26 PM To: jBoss Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Logging we can do better with a JMS based logger, where we provide "filters". We had such code demoing at Ja

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread marc fleury
Dan Christopherson > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 10:57 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging > > > I see four log levels as minimal, rather than complex. Right now on my > project we're using 6: Trace, Debug, Info, Warn, Error, Critical. > > Granted,

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Justin Forder
Sebastien Alborini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi, > >I think the logging process is too complex (four levels, Information >Error Debug Warning), and few people use this complexity in jboss code. >I would propose only 2 levels: >- Information-Error always printed >- Debug-Warning printed only if

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Dan Christopherson
I see four log levels as minimal, rather than complex. Right now on my project we're using 6: Trace, Debug, Info, Warn, Error, Critical. Granted, this works best if you have an infrastructure that lets you split things up according to level (and facility is even better) On Fri, 25 Aug 2000, Seba

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Sebastien Alborini
Hi, I think the logging process is too complex (four levels, Information Error Debug Warning), and few people use this complexity in jboss code. I would propose only 2 levels: - Information-Error always printed - Debug-Warning printed only if debug flag is true, this flag would be a parameter o

RE: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread marc fleury
Yeah we are going to rewrite that... hehe I said it! marc > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard Öberg > Sent: Friday, August 25, 2000 4:50 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Logging > > >

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Justin Forder
Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Hi! > >Justin Forder wrote: >> Are there any documentation conventions for MLETs? >> >> A good UNIX configuration file would be largely composed of explanatory >> text and commented-out examples. > >IMHO the current MLet conf style is seriously flawed. No

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hi! Justin Forder wrote: > Are there any documentation conventions for MLETs? > > A good UNIX configuration file would be largely composed of explanatory > text and commented-out examples. IMHO the current MLet conf style is seriously flawed. Not only is it a bad thing to have anonymous tags (

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Justin Forder
Justin Forder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Carlos Valiente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? > >To get rid of the JAWS trace, I'm afraid you need to alter a compile- >time flag and recompile. It's the debug flag in JDBCCommand.java. > >If someone expla

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Justin Forder
Rickard Öberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes >Hi > >Justin Forder wrote: >> Carlos Valiente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? >> >> To get rid of the JAWS trace, I'm afraid you need to alter a compile- >> time flag and recompile. It's the debug flag i

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Carlos Valiente
Justin Forder wrote: > > To get rid of the JAWS trace, I'm afraid you need to alter a compile- > time flag and recompile. It's the debug flag in JDBCCommand.java. Thanks for the hint, Justin (and Rickard, too). Everything goes *much* faster with logging set to "Errors" -- "Es tristi di pidil,

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hi Justin Forder wrote: > Carlos Valiente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? > > To get rid of the JAWS trace, I'm afraid you need to alter a compile- > time flag and recompile. It's the debug flag in JDBCCommand.java. > > If someone explains how t

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Justin Forder
Carlos Valiente <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? To get rid of the JAWS trace, I'm afraid you need to alter a compile- time flag and recompile. It's the debug flag in JDBCCommand.java. If someone explains how to configure logging at run-time, I shall

Re: [jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Rickard Öberg
Hi! Carlos Valiente wrote: > > Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? Check /conf/jboss.conf. First parameter is what to let through the filter. /Rickard -- Rickard Öberg Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.telkel.com http://www.jboss.org http://www.dreambean.com -- ---

[jBoss-User] Logging

2000-08-25 Thread Carlos Valiente
Is there any way to configure logging verbosity? -- "Es tristi di pidil, piru is mas tristi di pidil un duminiu .es" -- -- To subscribe:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Problems?: [EMAIL PROTEC