ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 November 2000 3:19
> To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat - Benchmark
>
> Ok, i tested Jetty and Tomcat in the same environment. Here
> are my results.
>
> ...
Stefan,
Do you know if the MS W
> -Original Message-
> From: Stefan Röper [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, 28 November 2000 3:19
> To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat - Benchmark
>
> Ok, i tested Jetty and Tomcat in the same environment. Here
> are my
; To: 'jBoss'
> Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat - Benchmark
>
>
> Ok, i tested Jetty and Tomcat in the same environment. Here
> are my results.
>
> Server Configuration:
> Pentium Pro 200MHz
> RAM 64 MB
> IDE Drive
> Red Hat Linux 7.0
>
>
ECTED]]Im Auftrag von Julian Gosnell
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 16. November 2000 11:16
An: jBoss
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
Jetty has a super-fast implementation to serve any
kind of page - static, dynamic (CGI, Servlet, JSP,
WebApp). Furthermore, becau
Aha - now I understand !
Sounds like a great idea.
I'm away for 8 or 9 days starting at the weekend (bad timing) so I wn't be able
to help much, but you really should get in touch with Greg about this. I'm sure
he'll be full of suggestions
Let me know if there's anything I can do.
Jules
|And it was only a subset of our stuff (this was a proof-of-concept:
|I'm trying to migrate our business objects to stateless session beans,
|I think it is the easiest way to go to EJB world since we currently
|have all DB access done via stateless server objects which are
|ver
Hi,
> > I just checked and we have more than 300 business
> > objects so when I have everything moved to EJB/jBoss environment
we'll
> > have 300 beans. Add web pages to that and I think that
> > we will be looking at ~10 Mb .ear file - should this be split up ?
>
> I think for dev
Hey
Ari Suutari wrote:
> And it was only a subset of our stuff (this was a proof-of-concept:
> I'm trying to migrate our business objects to stateless session beans,
> I think it is the easiest way to go to EJB world since we currently
> have all DB access done via stateless serve
> |
> |Btw, .ear deployment seems to be very slow on
> |both ones - I had .ear file of 4.8 Mb and it takes
>
> that is one BIG file buddy...
>
> marc
>
And it was only a subset of our stuff (this was a proof-of-concept:
I'm trying to migrate our business objects to stateless session b
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Wilkins
|Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 3:01 AM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: [Fwd: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat]
|
|
|
|
|Marc,
|
|Can you forward this to the list
|-Original Message-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ari Suutari
|Sent: Thursday, November 16, 2000 12:25 AM
|To: jBoss
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
|
|
|Hi,
|
|Jetty sure is a lot faster than Tomcat. I just ran a test
|with a JSP page
Jetty has a super-fast implementation to serve any
kind of page - static, dynamic (CGI, Servlet, JSP,
WebApp). Furthermore, because no arbitrary distinction
between different content types has to be made, and
because the http server and servlet container are so
tightly integrated Jetty can be extr
; marc
> >
> > |-Original Message-
> > |From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Gosnell
> > |Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
> > |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > |Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty
|Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
> |To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> |Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
> |
> |
> |Guys, Guys,
> |
> |Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
> |contrib/jetty in CVS
> |
> |Any questions - I'll be pleased to
PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Gosnell
|Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
|
|
|Guys, Guys,
|
|Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
|contrib/jetty in CVS
|
|Any questions - I'll be pleas
sage-
|From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Julian Gosnell
|Sent: Wednesday, November 15, 2000 5:45 PM
|To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
|
|
|Guys, Guys,
|
|Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
|contrib/jetty in CVS
|
|Any ques
Guys, Guys,
Jetty is already integrated with JBoss - look at
contrib/jetty in CVS
Any questions - I'll be pleased to answer them.
As for pros/cons - Do you want just a Servlet
Container, or the whole lot ?
As for the port number - tell Jetty to use whatever
port[s] you want in it's xml confi
, 2000 3:35 PMTo:
jBossSubject: RE: [jBoss-User] Jetty vs Tomcat
Michael,
Please post your numbers when you have them,
this
is very very very very interesting.
marc
PS:
The servlet container war has begun let the games
begin
-Original
On Nov 15, Bill Pfeiffer quoth:
> If your plan is to just use your servlet container to serve up http,
> why not use tomcat without apache. The benefit of running apache is
> that it serves static pages fast (I'm sure there are others). If
> everything is going to come out of the servlet contai
Michael,
Please
post your numbers when you have them,
this
is very very very very interesting.
marc
PS:
The servlet container war has begun let the games
begin
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael G.
D
If your plan is to just use your servlet container
to serve up http, why not use tomcat without apache. The benefit of
running apache is that it serves static pages fast (I'm sure there are
others). If everything is going to come out of the servlet container,
however, just set tomcat to li
"Michael G. Drew" wrote:
> I would like to design my web apps so that I can access them directy through a
>normal http url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp NOT: www.myserver.com:8080/myapp.
>I know I can do this by getting tomcat and apache working together, but when I
>introduce jBoss in th
Hi,
> "Michael G. Drew" wrote:
>
> I would like to design my web apps so that I can access them directy
> through a normal http url. ie: www.myserver.com/myapp NOT:
> www.myserver.com:8080/myapp. I know I can do this by getting tomcat
> and apache working together, but when I introduce jB
23 matches
Mail list logo
