Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-28 Thread Aaron Mulder
I seem to recall this is one of the less intuitive parts of EJX - but I think the option you need *is* there. There's an empty text field on the display, and you have to type in "Default Stateless Session Bean" or whatever. You have to type it exactly as it appears on the other pane, wher

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-27 Thread marc fleury
> I've got the stateful entry, and it gets loaded and works fine for the > testbeans. In the case where a jboss.xml file is available > defaultjboss.xml > doesn't seem to be loaded (I added some logging jBossFileManager where it > loads the file). interesting, send me that code so I can troublesh

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-27 Thread Luan O'Carroll
marc fleury wrote: > mm > > just checked it on my installation with > > org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.java#381 > >conf = > jar.getContainerConfigurations().getContainerConfiguration(DEFAULT_STATEFUL_ > CONFIGURATION); > > and > System.out.println("The configuration is "+conf); > > an

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-27 Thread marc fleury
mm just checked it on my installation with org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.java#381 conf = jar.getContainerConfigurations().getContainerConfiguration(DEFAULT_STATEFUL_ CONFIGURATION); and System.out.println("The configuration is "+conf); and I get The configuration is Default Statef

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-27 Thread Luan O'Carroll
I did some further checking and it seems that if a (partial/incomplete) jboss.xml file is present then jboss uses only those configurations found in the jboss.xml file and fails to find the default configurations.   org.jboss.ejb.ContainerFactory.java#381      conf =  jar.getContainerCo

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
ECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 1:14 PM To: jBoss Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support You say it does "TestBeans" but the server says "player.jar" Ok not a biggy, I think I already see what is going on Can you send me the *whole* messages from the serv

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
quot;command prompt" icon... or try clicking on the "run.bat" in the bin directory, that works too. marc > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Pierce > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:49 AM > To: 'jB

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread marc fleury
clicking on the "run.bat" in the bin directory, that works too. marc > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg Pierce > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:49 AM > To: 'jBoss' > Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Statef

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread marc fleury
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rickard Öberg > Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 7:24 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support > > > > Well it seems I've found a very

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
: 'jBoss' Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support Does anyone have any documentation for the jboss.xml file? EJX generated ones are still causing me problems. I'm telling EJX to create a new jboss xml and telling it to load my ejb-jar.xml (otherwise it doesn't e

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread marc fleury
built to work with just that (like jboss1.0 did)   regards   marc   -Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Greg PierceSent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 6:54 AMTo: 'jBoss'Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Supp

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
#x27;t allow my beans to deploy. -Original Message- From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 10:41 AM To: jBoss Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support Aaron Mulder wrote: > The symptom will be corrected shortly (we alrea

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Rickard Öberg
Aaron Mulder wrote: > The symptom will be corrected shortly (we already decided to quit > trying to load the classes in the MetaData). I'm not sure what the > underlying problem is (that is, why the class javax.ejb.EJBHome would be > unavailable). Is the parent of the classloader you're

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Aaron Mulder
at org.jboss.Main.(Main.java:86) > [Auto deploy] at java.security.AccessController.doPrivileged(Native > Method) > [Webserver] Starting > [Webserver] Codebase set to http://localhost:8083/ <http://localhost:8083/> > > -Original Message- > From: Greg Pierce [

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
Yeah I found one :) Now to figure out how to make it work properly using EJX so I can document it :) -Original Message- From: Rickard Öberg [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 10:24 AM To: jBoss Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support > Well

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Rickard Öberg
> Well it seems I've found a very interesting problem. jboss.xml is not optional as >some of the documentation implies. > Removing the jboss.xml from the HelloWorld.jar makes the system blow up in the same >manner as > before with the system spitting out : jboss.xml was optional when the old

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
et to http://localhost:8083/ -Original Message-From: Greg Pierce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 9:54 AMTo: 'jBoss'Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support Well I'm not useing a jboss.xml because its supposed to be opt

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Greg Pierce
her issue altogether. -Original Message-From: Luan O'Carroll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Wednesday, July 26, 2000 5:26 AMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support I too have stateful session beans working with the CVS dowloaded last Friday

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-26 Thread Luan O'Carroll
I too have stateful session beans working with the CVS dowloaded last Friday.   marc fleury wrote:> > btw the stateful beans in there work just off ejb-jar.xml (no jboss.xml with   My jar has a jboss.xml file as does the one posted at   http://www.bonevich.com/ejb/helloworld.jar   it contain

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread Jeffrey & Nikkole Bonevich
r.xml (no jboss.xml with > it) > > marc > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of marc fleury > > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 8:50 AM > > To: jBoss > > Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Su

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread Greg Pierce
TED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vaughn Vernon > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 11:13 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support > > > Hi Marc, > > I agree with Greg. Since I was struggling with stateful about a week ago I > took

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread marc fleury
ECTED]]On Behalf Of Vaughn Vernon > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 11:13 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support > > > Hi Marc, > > I agree with Greg. Since I was struggling with stateful about a week ago I > took note of what others were saying.

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread Vaughn Vernon
is yet, but I have many instances > where beans aren't deploying and they are very simple instances and with > ejb-jar.xml files generated by EJX. > > -Original Message- > From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 12:09 PM > To: jBos

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread Greg Pierce
al Message- From: marc fleury [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 12:09 PM To: jBoss Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support OK I should be more precise. The Stateful bean in TestBeans.jar works fine for me. I encourage you to take a look at it and see i

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread marc fleury
fleury > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 8:50 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support > > > stateful is supported > > marc > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Be

RE: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread marc fleury
stateful is supported marc > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Vaughn Vernon > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2000 7:49 AM > To: jBoss > Subject: Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support > > > Adinath

Re: [jBoss-User] Stateful Session Bean Support

2000-07-25 Thread Vaughn Vernon
Adinath wrote: > > I am having problems trying to deploy a stateful > session bean. > > Reading the mailist archives, I am not sure if jBoss > supports this? > > Can some one pls. advise? > > Regards, > Adinath > You must be on to something ;-) Vaughn -- -