JIRA seems to suggest that the latest version of Negotiation is 2.0.3.SP1
(around April 2009), but the Downloads link only shows 2.0.3.GA (around
Janurary 2009).
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/SECURITY?report=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.project:roadmap-panel
Is it possible to use JBoss Negotiation with just Tomcat (not JBoss)?
If so, can someone please point me to the documentation?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4247131#4247131
Reply to the post :
Is there a forum for RestEASY?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4198631#4198631
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4198631
___
jboss-user mailing list
FYI... I asked the same question here:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=146142
As a rule, I think any Java object is treated as minOccurs=0. The only thing
that isn't optional are primitives like int. Alas, I too am interested in some
control over this because some
I have a web service that returns Dates. Imagine something simple like:
| @WebMethod
| Date getCurrentBusinessDate()
|
In this case, I am only interested in a Date (not a Time or Date Time). This
is by design because otherwise one might go down the road of considering Time
Zones,
Consider a simple web service method:
| @WebMethod
| void foo (@WebParam(name=param) String param)
|
When generating the WSDL using wsgen, and inspecting it in SoapUI, I notice
that a primitive type (like an int) won't appear as optional, but an object
reference does. In some cases, I
More than a year later, and thirdparty-all is still kicking around...
These kitchen sink -all jars need to be replaced with proper poms and let
Maven do its job. With the -all jars, we need to pay attention to classpath
ordering to avoid version conflicts... Ugh!
View the original post :
I received a reply from the ICEfaces Forum:
http://www.icefaces.org/JForum/posts/list/6110.page
anonymous wrote : The TimerBean interface is not currently being used. If you
wanted to add to the TimerBeamImpl, make it stateful for example, you might
want it. Other than that, it's just legacy.
I notice that CR3 is on the JBoss Maven2 repository (great!), but I don't see a
CR3 release for JBoss-EL. Is that an oversight?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4098987#4098987
Reply to the post :
After building a project with seam-gen, I see a TimerBean interface and
TimerBeanImpl class. I see the timer component is being used by
layout\template.xhtml, but I am wondering why this is generated instead of part
of the ice jar?
View the original post :
So in the end, how did you do this Kevin? Did you use Pete's strategy, or end
up using Hibernate Interceptors?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4073228#4073228
Reply to the post :
The lack of qualification for the component name presents this risk. Why not
make it best practice to qualify the component name? So built-in components are
org.jboss.seam.Session, and my own objects would be
com.domain.project.Session. I know it seems verbose, but it just seems
practical for
I am trying to mimick the demo:
http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3/demos/movies/jbpm-overview.htm
But I am stuck on the first point... My Eclipse 3.2 does not have a New JBPM
project option. I have JBossIDE installed:
http://download.jboss.org/jbosstools/updates/development
Do I need another
Out of curiousity, what is special with the facelets library that comes with
Seam? (I can see that it doesn't match 1.1.11 or 1.1.12 -- both of which are
several months old already...)
As a Maven user, I typically just enter a dependency that is available from
Ibiblio or somewhere... In this
What version of Facelets is required for Seam 1.3 and JBoss 4.2?
I notice that 1.1.11 is still the latest official release, but the file size
doesn't match (1.1.12 draft either).
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4053643#4053643
Reply to the post
According to the documentation:
anonymous wrote :
| The converter works with any entity which has an @Id annotation - either
simple or composite.
|
But if I try to use it with an Entity that has a String as the @Id, I get a
NumberFormatException:
|
I'm using Seam 1.3.0.ALPHA. Here is the full stack trace:
Caused by javax.servlet.ServletException with message: For input string: USD
| javax.faces.webapp.FacesServlet.service(FacesServlet.java:256)
|
I logged this issue in JIRA: http://jira.jboss.com/jira/browse/JBSEAM-1444
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4053799#4053799
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4053799
I think you have raised a good question...
I personally don't use it beyond getting an initial baseline. I have found
that even after the code generation, I need to hunt around and make several
tweaks (disabling schema validation, changing the naming strategy -- some of
this is related to
Are you sure that did the trick? I see the same hibernate-all.jar in
project\lib as seam-gen\lib. Renaming the one in project\lib doesn't change a
thing for me...
I recall I had this problem in the past and I had gotten around it by removing
tables and constraints...
View the original post
I traced the problem to having a foreign key constraint. If I drop the
constraint, seam-gen works fine...
(But I want that constraint, and I'm expecting seam-gen will generate code with
convert-entity...)
View the original post :
From Michael Yuan's blog, he instructs to update the /WEB-INF/faces-config.xml
file to add the SeamELResolver using the new JSF 1.2 XML schema declaration...
Looking at a fresh seam-gen application (from 1.3.0.ALPHA), I see that
faces-config still has the 1.1 dtd and it has no SeamELResolver...
I would like to reiterate the value of Maven support.
I liken Maven to my TiVo. It is one of those inventions that you don't really
need, but when you start using it, you realize the benefits.
The main issue with using Maven is that the open-source dependencies are driven
by a community. If
When looking at seam-gen generated xhtml, I can see it is formatted in a way
that the element attributes are aligned on the equals (=) sign:
| s:decorate id=nameDecoration template=layout/edit.xhtml
| ui:define name=labelname/ui:define
|
From 12.4.7. HTTP Authentication, the Seam docs say:
anonymous wrote : Although not recommended for use unless absolutely necessary,
Seam provides means for authenticating using
| either HTTP Basic or HTTP Digest (RFC 2617) methods.
Can someone elaborate on why HTTP authentication is meant to
Consider the following seam-gen generated snippet from an Edit.xhtml:
| h:inputText id=code
|disabled=#{countryHome.managed}
|required=true
|size=2
| maxlength=2
|
For a long time, I never paid much attention to localization because my users
all spoke English. Alas, I now need the convenience of localization.
I remember that the earlier generation of seam-gen (the one built into the
Hibernate reverse engineering tool part of the JBoss IDE) embedded
seam generate-entities is failing for me with the latest CVS tree because
ehcache is missing from the lib directory. It reports a
java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError: net/sf/ehcache/CacheException.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4050774#4050774
After supplying the ehcache jar, generate-entities fails with a new error:
anonymous wrote :
| BUILD FAILED
| java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access field
org.hibernate.cfg.Collection
| SecondPass.collection from class
org.hibernate.cfg.JDBCBinder$JDBCCollectionSecondPass
View the
I am afraid that you missed my point...
I am advocating that the framework (EntityQuery or Query) defines a default so
that the numerous Entity List classes do not need to declare this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4050688#4050688
Reply to
The boiler-plate for an entity List class overrides getMaxResults with a
constant:
| @Override
| public Integer getMaxResults() {
| return 25;
| }
|
Why is this done (or necessary)? The underlying Query
I notice that this issue (http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBSEAM-843) is
still not on the roadmap. (I recall that this had just missed the 1.1.7
release, but I had hoped that it would have been included in the 1.2.x release,
and now I don't even see it scheduled for 1.3.)
Please don't
I'd like to add my two cents...
First off, I agree that a displaytag equivalent is a great idea! Sometimes a
simple solution is the best. And I too have searched for a JSF equivalent to
displaytag. I would love to see Seam (or one of the Faces sister projects)
provide something like this.
I'd just like to add that I did have a build problem where the
messages_en.properties file wasn't placed properly in WEB-INF/classes, but even
after it was resolved, I still can't get the enum translations to work...
View the original post :
Good work Kent! I can't wait to try this...
I can't stress how important this feature is because the reverse engineering
approach makes a lot of incorrect assumptions. The Entity bean provides much
richer information for CRUD generation.
Some problems that I have run into with reverse
For an edit page, I have an enum. My code looks something like:
| s:selectItems value=#{myEnumTypes}
| var=enumType label=#{messages[enumType]}
| hideNoSelectionLabel=true noSelectionLabel=Please select.../
|
My problem is that I am not seeing any label text... I may have a bug
I think I have the same problem as you, and Gavin suggested getting the latest
seam-gen from CVS... See my post:
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopict=101221
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4014189#4014189
Reply to the post :
From my 1.1.6 GA seam-gen project, the template.xhtml has a link to
stylesheet/date.css, but the date.css file is not part of the project. Looks
like a bug...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4013910#4013910
Reply to the post :
I used seam-gen from 1.1.6 GA to create a reverse-engineered project. I have a
table with a self join. (Note that in order to use generate-entities, I had to
drop the foreign key constraint, then I doctored the generated project a bit to
restore the object relationship.) My entity looks
Does anybody know if this is still necessary with 1.1.5 GA of Seam?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4009207#4009207
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4009207
From this movie, I can see how Hibernate Tools can be used to reverse engineer
a Seam CRUD application based on a database schema. My main problem is that
the Entity beans that it generates aren't always right. (For example, I have
two entities: Exchange and Country. There is a Many-To-One
From http://raibledesigns.com/page/rd?entry=tse_hop_into_real_object:
anonymous wrote : Ben just did a survey of the room asking who's using Ant vs.
Maven. Surprisingly, Ant only slightly beats Maven.
I can't stress the importance of being able to declare Seam as a dependency for
Maven users.
I can see someone has a similar issue:
http://opensource.atlassian.com/projects/hibernate/browse/ANN-513
I though about using AssertTrue, but it felt forced, especially when I would
need to use several if I wanted to actually link errors to certain fields...
Is there a way that I can create a
I am creating JPA/EJB3 entity objects, and am using Hibernate Validation
annotations for some basic constraints. And I definitely like how this
validation framework is leveraged by Seam -- DRY!
But how can I best provide semantic object level validation? For example,
imagine that I have a
44 matches
Mail list logo
