[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: Partial Refresh

2009-02-07 Thread blublinsky
Additional information on the problem. I am running java 6. When the page updates it prints out the following error messages 19:45:42,750 ERROR [STDERR] Feb 7, 2009 7:45:42 PM org.jboss.portletbridge.AjaxPortletBridge init INFO: Start portletbridge initialization for IdentityUserPortlet 19:45:4

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Re: Partial Refresh

2009-02-06 Thread blublinsky
Yes Let me try to be more specific. When I set partial replies, nothing refreshes. I can see the reply coming back to the page, but it is not rendering incoming replies. It looks like I am missing some configuration, but the overall documentation is too sketchy View the original post : http://

[jboss-user] [JBoss Portal] - Partial Refresh

2009-02-05 Thread blublinsky
I am using JBoss Portal 2.7.1 After reading section 26.3.2 of the reference guide, I reconfigured, using property editor of the management portlet partial refresh. After this is done, I can see that although doView method is invoked, the content of the page does not change. After reading documen

[jboss-user] [JBossWS] - wise SOAP client

2008-12-07 Thread blublinsky
When I have switched from SOAP client to wise SOAP client, I can't read the same WSDL file. The error that I am getting is: 13:06:41,029 INFO [STDOUT] parsing WSDL... 13:06:41,185 INFO [STDOUT] [ERROR] Failed to read the WSDL document: file:/xsd/input/fbs/v1.0/CreateAccountInput-1.0.xsd, becaus

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: True parallel execution in fork

2008-12-07 Thread blublinsky
They kinda do, but start throwing Hibernate exceptions, telling that Hibernate does not want to share context. If I put small enough timeout, they are always picked up by the same thread, if the delay is large enough, threads are different, but exceptions are thrown. Also, this mechanism does no

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - Re: EsbActionHandler

2008-12-07 Thread blublinsky
Actually it does not. If I look at the node code, it either implements action or transition, not both. So unless I somehow explicitely signal it, it does not transition. Am I missing something? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194887#4194887 Rep

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - True parallel execution in fork

2008-12-03 Thread blublinsky
Are there plans for supporting true parallel execution in fork? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194139#4194139 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4194139 ___

[jboss-user] [JBoss jBPM] - EsbActionHandler

2008-12-03 Thread blublinsky
This action handler does not have context.leavenode() at the end. As a result, it never transition from the node ant the process requires additional signalling View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4194138#4194138 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-16 Thread blublinsky
Which email should I use? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4158468#4158468 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4158468 ___ jboss-user mailing list jboss

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-15 Thread blublinsky
That was not my understanding from the write up. Are you creating and deliting queues dynamically based on what I am subscribing to, the same way QPID does? I would be happy to explain exactly what we are trying to do. Should we try to have a conf call? View the original post : http://www.jbo

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-13 Thread blublinsky
Yes, so that I controll everything centrally. I can foresee 100s of nodes in the cluster, so I do not want to deal with config files, or at least minimize their amount View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4158088#4158088 Reply to the post : http://

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-13 Thread blublinsky
So instead of server going to LDAP you suggest me to do integration with LDAP on the side and then synch server with the results, right? This will also allow me to have my own watchdog for LDAP changes. Right? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4158

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-13 Thread blublinsky
Thanks, Do you have an example of integration of JBM with LDAP for queue definitions (that will work JBM 2.0) anywhere? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4157976#4157976 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-12 Thread blublinsky
Tim, What is the timeframe for beta drop? Can you provide Navteq with pre beta, so that we can start testing it. So for now I will use JBM 2.0 standalone and wait for clustering Also, where can I look for deployer functionality and what is it intended for? Usage samples, etc? View the original

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-12 Thread blublinsky
Also, with clustering, will I be able to control a cluster/location of the clustered queues from a single point and without restarting servers? Can you point me to a document (maybe prelininary) which would explain how it will work? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modul

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-12 Thread blublinsky
I am planning to use local network, so UDP will be fine. Are you planning to use the same clustering mechanism in 2.0 or is it going to be different? Do you recomment to start evaluating 1.4 with clustering and external servers or wait till beta? View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/i

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-12 Thread blublinsky
Two reasons why I want to embed JBM into my application. First performance gains, it should be faster then Bridge. Second more important, if server is a separate process, then if my process goes away and server is still up, then I would get into situation, where some of my messages will be sitti

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - JBM 2.0 Clustering

2008-06-11 Thread blublinsky
I realize that clustering is not part of Alpha release, but because it is essintial for my architecture I want to try to find out whether it is going to support the following (Unfortunately, I can't paste a picture here, but can provide it). I have a massively parallel grid of execution nodes an