Hi
We are using JBoss Messaging. In our new setup there is a firewall between the
server and client. Therefore we do not want to use random ports in our JMS
setup. We have set attribute name=secondaryBindPort44580/attribute
|attribute
By the way we are using JBoss 4.2.3 GA with JBoss Messaging 1.4.4 installed.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4257269#4257269
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4257269
By the way I'm unable to make it work even if start the setup without a
firewall between. As soon as I enable secondaryBindPort and
secondaryConnectPort on the JMS server, the setup fails:
Here is the log:
| 2009-09-28 11:12:57,398 DEBUG [org.jboss.remoting.Client]
Solved it. I just set the secondaryBindPort and not the secondaryConnectPort,
then it seems to work.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4257333#4257333
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4257333
Hi.
We are in the process of moving from ANT build scripts to Maven2.
As a first step we have migrated a jar containing common functionality to
Maven2.
This jar now contains a maven directory under /META-INF. This directory
contains among other things a pom.xml.
When we start JBoss 4.0.2
Hi
I'm really sure if this is the right place to ask. I could not find any
specific JGroups forums.
However, let me know if there is a more suitable place.
We're using JGroups 2.4.1 sp3 in a JBoss 4.0.2. We're using JGroups to send
messages between the various servers. It works fine.
We have
But we are using TCP.
Our configuration:
TCP(start_port=7810)
Shouldn't that do what UNICAST would do?
As I understand it, BasicConnectionTable is in the layer called
BuildingBlocks. UNICAST and NACKACK are in lower layers. How can a lower
layer help things gone wrong in a higher layer?
Our code is very simple, and as such we have no concept of cluster.
We basically have a Channel upon which we call send(Message msg).
When the method returns we don't know whether the transmission went through or
not. Therefore if the socket is closed, the message is lost.
View the original
I'm trying to hotpatch a Java class as described here
http://www.fasterj.com/articles/hotpatch1.shtml
However I am unable to obtain the Class I want to redefine. The class is used
in an ear deployment.
I'm only able to get the sun.misc.Launcher$AppClassLoader which cannot see the
class I am
