Have a look at:
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=ClassCastExceptions
specifically, the jmx-console approach mentioned over there
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3980244#3980244
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module
Thanks!
You were right, by following the link in that thread I solved my problem. I
needed to modify the following config files like so:
- default/deploy/ear-deployer.xml
- Isolated => true
- CallByValue => true
- default/conf/jboss-service.xml
- NamingService: CallByValue
I am looking for a solution for the same exact problem. It would be very
appreciated if anyone could point us to some documentation on the subject or
provide any insightful information.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4069699#4069699
Reply to
Hello,
I have the same problem with JBoss 4.2.1GA. I have a @Service EJB, in start()
method I create a EJB timer, and it works.
The first problem is when I shutdown jboss, in the stop() method of the Service
EJB I call the method timer.cancel(), and it throws an exception with the
message "tim
sorry, the examples are on
attribute name ="DateFormat"
and
attribute name ="InitialStartDate"
respectly
thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4155929#4155929
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply
Well, I solved the problem.
The solution was easy; simply add the dateformat:
dd/MM/ HH:mm
and a past date with the our that you want on initialstartdate
04/06/2008 11:30
When the server (Jboss) restarts, it starts to shodule at the next hour of the
next day automatically
View the original
Hi,
My scenario is to delete a record from the table.
I am using client and calling session facade, from session facade calling CMP
Home Interface remove method by passing "primary key" value. Bean ejbRemove
method is also having the same "primary key" parameter. In the method body, do
I nee
when trying to remove a record from the DB. I am using findByPrimaryKey(id)
method and then calling home.remove method, but while deployment I am getting
the following error. Please help me out to remove the record from DB.
10:01:14,271 WARN [verifier] EJB spec violation:
Bean : RCVlanHome
When I throw the swing client from eclipse IDE it runs correctly, but when I
throw the application from a jsp with the next call it fails:
http://java.sun.com/products/autodl/j2se";
java-vm-args="-esa -Xnoclassgc -client" initial-heap-size="256m"
max-heap-size="512m"/>
View th
Could anybody help me?
It's very urgently.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160815#4160815
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160815
___
jboss-user
anonymous wrote : Perhaps the jms-sender code needs to be transaction-aware,
and postpone the send until the tx commits? Is this possible?
If you include the message sending functionality as part of the same
transaction which saves the Person, then the "send" will only happen on a
successful c
http://www.odi.ch/prog/jms-tx.php explains transactional jms quite well.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4160862#4160862
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4160862
_
Now it's working correcty.
I change the version of server to use, from jboss 5.0.0.Beta4 to jboss
4.2.2.GA. It feel that was a motify of configuration of the jboss.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4161093#4161093
Reply to the post :
http://www
Hi All,
Has anyone solved this problem. I`m having the exact same issue.
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4164706#4164706
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4164706
_
Sorry . the configeration in scheduler-service.xml is:
true
datang:name=SvrMon
check
NOW
5000
-1
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168613#4168613
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op
Sorry again. the configeration in scheduler-service.xml is:
|
|
|
| true
| datang:name=SvrMon
| check
| NOW
| 3000
| -1
|
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168616#4168616
Reply to the post
Something must be reminded of is: it's just happened incidentally, not always.
I have already seen JBAS-1823 in the following url:
https://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-1823
But the stack trace is not the same with mine. So i don't know is there any
relations between them.
Please help, Thank
Anyone help me?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4168895#4168895
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4168895
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@list
Stateless session beans do no have identity so every concurrent request will
actually be directed to a different instance from the stateless session bean
pool. The server dynamically manages the pool size to deal with the request
load.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?m
Ok...What about the case where I have retrieved a handle to a single instance
of a StatelessSessionEJB up front. Then multiple client threads try to invoke
methods on the bean. Do they go to multiple EJB's as you suggest? If I look at
the MBean for the EJB I only see 2 beans created.
View the
I believe the multithreaded calls on the same handle will go to different bean
instances.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112410#4112410
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112410
I think that it depends on internal implementation of an application server. As
I understand a SLSB should not has internal state. In this case, in theory, one
instance of the SLSB enough to serve all client's call.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic
No. A bean is always guaranteed to be called by one thread at any given point.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4112828#4112828
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4112828
Create a jar file containing your EJBs and the ejb-jar.xml and place it in the
deploy folder of JBoss.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4113268#4113268
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4113268
"[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote : No. A bean is always guaranteed to be called by one
thread at any given point.
May be I'm wrong about SLSB because I'm not strong with EJB, but I really don't
see any sense in this guarantee. If code hasn't internal state it is thread
safe, so any constraints are exce
What you miss is that SLSBs *can* have internal state, e.g. a cached datasource
handle that they re-use to serve incoming requests.
Stateless is the interpretation from a client's point of view, so if a SLSB has
3 methods, a client should be able to call those methods on different bean
instance
If there are more than one threads from a single client, can they access the
same SLSB simultaneously? If so, what exception would be thrown?
Thanks
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114405#4114405
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.
The best thing to do is to make a testcase and see what happens.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4114409#4114409
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4114409
__
I created JIRA issue JBAS-5173 (http://jira.jboss.org/jira/browse/JBAS-5173)
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4123511#4123511
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4123511
__
Hi
For having the SybaseDS to be available in your Application server you need to
deploy the sybase-ds.xml in the deploy folder of the JBoss.
The sample sybase-ds.xml file will be available in the examples of jboss.
examples/jca/sybase-ds.xml
Regards,
Suresh.A
View the original post :
http:/
I found that it is possible to specify a dead-letter queue using annotations.
For those wondering, they can be found here:
org.jboss.resource.adapter.jms.inflow.JmsActivationSpec
But the question of using deployment descriptors is still valid. Can someone
help me figure out what's wrong with my
It would be great if someone from the Team had a look at this. Could this be a
bug?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4130265#4130265
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4130265
__
anonymous wrote : +- [EMAIL PROTECTED]
First, you need to fix the random number that is appended to the jndi-name of
your EJB's local home. See this
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/Wiki.jsp?page=WhyDoesTheLocalNameContainARandomNumber
for details.
Once you fix that, your JNDI tree might look like (
thank you that was very very helpful
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4131886#4131886
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4131886
___
jboss-user mailing
Hi Legga,
Have you managed to get your MDB to listen to the remote queue? I am trying to
do exactly the same thing but i get stuck when i deploy my MDB. It fails to
connect to the remote queue.
Any suggestions?
Tx
Marco
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=v
"icruz" wrote : Hello,
|
| ... and when I try to create the timer it fails with a "duplicate key"
exception from MySQL driver
|
| Thanks in advance,
| Isaac
I wonder where in the JMX-console could you cancel the timer??
I was unable to find it.
View the original post :
http://www.j
First of all, its poor design to do your SQL manipulations in a JSP.
Second, are you calling commit() or rollback() on the transaction you are
starting before trying to close resources?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4105053#4105053
Reply to t
Lets continue the discussion in your other post at
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=118240
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4082611#4082611
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=r
I located the problem. Probably, it is a JBoss Bug, but I was able to bypass it
in our code.
The problem was the following. Within one transaction we created a new entity
in the OrderService:
...
| orderEntity = EntityHomeHelper.getOrderHome().create(); // it is
important that the madator
http://java.sun.com/javaee/5/docs/api/
As per the API specification, the getSingleResult() method should throw a
NoResultException if an entity cannot be found. You are simply seeing the
original exception chained. To execute without throwing an exception you will
need to use the
anonymous wr
Yes - i figured that out after posting on Seam's forum.
One more thing. Basically Seam always get's me chainded exceptions and its hard
to know what's what. - is there a way to print only part of a stack trace wich
is directly responsible for exception (all i know i can use is getMesage and
get
4 years later, this problem still exists. I had to proceed with the same very
ugly hack.
Will I spend time to file a bug request? Well, given that the JBoss team had 4
years to read this forum post that points to an obvious bug, I think I'll pass.
Maybe I'll file it next year, it's not like any
Are the classes used by both still the same?
The naming of the ear should not be an issue. The contents are important.
The error looks to happen here:
| at $Proxy120.notifyPaymentFailed(Unknown Source)
|
Did anything change here?
And by that I do not only mean the method but the classes u
The problem has been resolved :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=134089
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4147436#4147436
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4147436
___
You did not post the actual exception stacktrace, which might give us an idea
what the problem is.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4148367#4148367
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4148367
___
Ok, i read that other post of your's and looks like a classloading issue.
anonymous wrote : i think it migth be caused by the fact my local or remote
interfaces are in a jar in the libdir of portal, and also in my ear.
Have you enabled classloading scoping for your EAR? You can do so by addin
thanks a lot for the hint.
I'm using reflection for now (getMethod, methode.Invoke) on the object i lookup
but i will continue to investigate this cast exception, and so i'll look at
your link and try this.
thx again,
--
Lucas
Montes
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?
i finally found where this strange acting comes from. it's actually the
contrary of your suggestion. defining a loader repository is the cause of the
problem, and when i don't define any, the cast of the object accessed by jndi
in the local interface of my EJB is going perfectly well.
the unifi
so the problem is caused by the isolation of classloading in my ear.
I tested by putting the attribute calledByValue in
default/deploy/conf/jboss-service.xml and it worked, but it's not an acceptable
solution as it has repercutions on all jndi lookups, and it increase a lot the
ressource usage
problem solved :) i've done a lookup forcing the marshalling for method
invocation (called-by-value) by putting the full scheme in the lookup :
| new InitialContext("jnp://localhost:1099/EJBJndiName");
|
(my project manager wanted to keep the scoping of classloading for my ear so
that was
Can you switch to stateful session bean? If yes, you can try the following:
1. Have the stateful sesion bean class implements
javax.ejb.SessionSynchronization interface.
2. Make the database operation transactional, so that in the case of JTA
rollback the data is not updated in the DB.
2. With
"kahzoo" wrote : Can you switch to stateful session bean?
|
Yes I can , but after assessing there is not much hit on performance.
One thing that worries me with Synchronization is that Synch is on whole bean
and not the methods :).
Now I need to have more than one Stateful session bean.
Thi
anonymous wrote : One thing that worries me with Synchronization is that Synch
is on whole bean and not the methods :).
|
| Now I need to have more than one Stateful session bean.
|
I'm sorry, but I'm failing to understand what your concern is.
Are you saying that you have to split the l
Thank you Khazoo , for your support.
"kahzoo" wrote :
|
| With BMT, you need to do the transaction demarcation (begin, commit,
rolback) yourself, but since your bean will know the outcome of the
transaction, it can decide to write/do-not-write data in the file accordingly.
|
This is
Please do not post the same question in multiple forums
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=136149
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4153215#4153215
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mod
"jaikiran" wrote : Please do not post the same question in multiple forums
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=136149
Please do not post a response if you cannot be helpful.
Given my problem, its unclear which camp it belongs in: Seam, Hibernate, JTA,
Jboss EJB. Given that
Folks,
Here is a resolution to my problem:
What fixed this for me was doing
UserTransaction.begin() before creating the entity manager from the entity
manager factory.
If I create my entity manager and then start the user transaction, the entity
manager is never able to associate with the start
"rituraj_tiwari" wrote :
| Please do not post a response if you cannot be helpful.
|
| Given my problem, its unclear which camp it belongs in: Seam, Hibernate,
JTA, Jboss EJB. Given that there is a forum called EJB3.0 and another one
called JBoss/EJB, I think my cross-posting to EJB3.0 i
You need to test for yourself. A simple thing to do is to use different
invokers to access the same EJB and measure the time:
- classic rmi invoker
- pooled invoker
- iiop invoker
- http invoker
My guess would be that the pooled and iiop invokers would be a bit faster
because they can keep the
Hi!
Do you have news about this issue?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061404#4061404
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4061404
___
jboss-user maili
Apologies. I've posted this to the wrong forum. Is there a way I can move it
to JBoss Seam Users?
Thanks
Richard
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4061573#4061573
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=r
Perhaps you can use environment settings in your ejb-jar.xml?
the tag is ""
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064686#4064686
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064686
_
Perfect! Thanks!
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4064785#4064785
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4064785
___
jboss-user mailing list
jboss-user@lis
Why the call to tm.suspend()?
By marking the method with TransactionAttributeType.NEVER you're stating that
there will not be a transaction in progress when the method is called.
Maybe try using TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTED instead of NEVER. That
way, if the caller has an associated
Thanks for your answer Wayne. Irrespective of the attrubute type, the use of UT
is prohibited.
So my point is - the use of UT in CMT is not allowed according to EJB Spec but
looks like we have a way to get around this restriction (if I am not missing
something obvious :) )
Whenever my method o
I just checked out the EJB3 Spec and found the following:
Section 13.6.5 Handling of Methods that Run with "an unspecified transaction
context"
anonymous wrote :
| The term ?an unspecified transaction context? is used in the EJB
specification to refer to the cases in
| which the EJB archit
anonymous wrote : The execution of a method of an enterprise bean with
container-managed transaction demarcation
| for which the value of the transaction attribute is NOT_SUPPORTED, NEVER,
or SUPPORTS.
However Wayne, I am able to use UT from a REQUIRED method too, which I think
the above qu
I am not sure whether its possible to just redeploy the jar which belongs to
the ear. You can however redeploy the entire ear.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4050355#4050355
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=post
Can't you do something like:
int deletedEntities = entityManager.createQuery("delete from Customer");
if you want to remove all records from a customer table? I have not tried this
yet, but it works in Hibernate based on their documentation:
http://www.hibernate.org/hib_docs/entitymanager/refer
Except, unfortunately, that the project in question does not use Hibernate.
It seems that there is no way to accomplish this through EJB:
http://forum.java.sun.com/thread.jspa?threadID=5174100&messageID=9671593
The impetus for this post was that, with a sufficiently large number of
entities, I e
in jboss.xml , add this and try out.
ejbName
org.jboss.ejb3.StrictMaxPool
5
6
View the original post :
Thanks for the response rmurugs.
Unfortunately what you've suggested doesn't comply with the dtd:
http://www.jboss.org/j2ee/dtd/jboss_4_2.dtd and won't build.
Is there any other way I can enforce StrictMaxPool?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4
"imranpariyani" wrote : My application runs fine for a while but after that it
just hangs
|
Follow the steps mentioned in
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/StackTrace
or
http://wiki.jboss.org/wiki/GenerateAThreadDumpWithTheJMXConsole
to get the thread dump. That will help you figure out what the
hello,
I had the same problem, for a "long" ejb method the transaction timed out after
5 minute.
I fixed it changing the transaction timeout in the jboss-service.xml file
|
| 300
| ${jboss.server.data.dir}/tx-object-store
|
|
I hope this helps
francesco
Vie
Please help me.It's urgent
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4178322#4178322
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4178322
___
jboss-user mailing list
"muddu_shafi" wrote : Please help me, I am a newbieâÃÂæ..
|
| I have a class which is looking for JNDI in Jboss, I have deployed the jar
file for this project in Jboss deploy directory.
| Can any one explain me, where should I place my datasource xml file, i.e
should I place it in
For EJB 3.0 you can edit the ejb3-interceptors-aop.xml file under
/jboss_home/server/all/deploy directory. Edit the element for "Stateless Bean"
with something like this
@org.jboss.annotation.ejb.PoolClass
(value=org.jboss.ejb3.StrictMaxPool.class, maxSize=1, timeout=1)
I h
thanks for the replies ...
@jaikiran .. after analyzing the tread dump i was able to figure out where the
problem was .. so thanks for the clue :)
Regards
Imran
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4179870#4179870
Reply to the post :
http://www.
See if this helps
https://www.jboss.org/jbossejb3/docs/reference/build/reference/en/html/session-bean-config.html
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4182158#4182158
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=repl
Forgot to mention: we are posting messages on queues and we have the connection
set for "slow consumer" by necessity. This is why we need more than 15 beans in
play.
Thanks,
J
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4182131#4182131
Reply to the post :
Hi,
I have a table which is having composite primary key(id,name), Can anyone tell
me how to provide composite primary key in ejb-jar.xml.
For primary key we can give like this:--
http://java.sun.com/dtd/ejb-jar_2_0.dtd";>
ProductEJB
com.javasrc.licenseserver.ejb.product
Hey Grim,
Even am getting the same problem.But am xecuting in windows env.
u got the real reason for this
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4211412#4211412
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=
I have the same problem. Is there any solution?
I debugged a little an saw that org.jboss.ejb3.AbstractPool#injectors.length ==
0 means that InfinitePool(AbstractPool).create(line: 111) will not inject
anything.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=
I know little (nothing) about seam, but with stateless beans I've had very
little success annotating private methods with @TransactionAttribute. I
believe those annotations only work when the method is called from outside the
EJB. In this case, it's probably just best for you to inject the
Us
thank you!
i've tried @TransactionAttribute outside the bean and it's helped.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4215260#4215260
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4215260
One other thing I forgot was the @TransactionManagement and
@TransactionAttribute, when injecting the UserTransaction for the thread, I set
these items on the bean like so:
| @TransactionManagement(TransactionManagementType.BEAN)
| @TransactionAttribute(TransactionAttributeType.NOT_SUPPORTE
Also this is what get printed in the logs continuously
2009-03-05 10:29:16,162 DEBUG [org.jboss.ejb.txtimer.TimerImpl] Timer was not
registered with Tx, resetting state:
[id=1236266846001,target=[target=jboss.j2ee:service=EJB3,ear=InventoryServices.ear,jar=InventoryOperationsEJB.jar,name=HealthC
anonymous wrote : the timer is created but the timeout method is executed
multiple times. It waits for the specified duration(1 min) and again executes
multiple times. is there any specific reason.
That's because, you configured the timer to do so :)
anonymous wrote : ctx.getTimerService().cr
My previous post may have been a little confusing, so a quick clarification:
We are using JBoss 4.0.5GA. Using EJB3 with JBoss 4.0.5GA, you can indeed time
out long ejb method calls using the connector as described in my previous post.
We would like to implement the same timeout mechanism for
Very very wild guess - was there any Day Light Saving time in 1968? If yes,
then is the JDK on the server patched with the DST changes?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4217538#4217538
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
Hmm, nearly.
I fixed it.
The jdk which is used by the jboss is missing the file jre/lib/tzmapping
Normally this should have been installed by the java installer.
Happens only on windows. Hrmpf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4217564#4217564
Repl
-- Bump
I'm seeing this same problem; albeit for a slightly different reason. I'm
using SLF4J-log4j, which seems like it's attempting to set the priority.
Here's the relevant stacktrace bits:
| java.lang.IllegalAccessError: tried to access field
org.apache.log4j.Priority.level from
|
Hello Sir...
I am facing the same issue ...
and even i m porting my code from weblogic to jboss
can you tell me that what changes i need to make in ejb-jar.xml
ThnQ sir ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4200963#4200963
Reply to the post
Hello...
Have a look at the below URL-
http://www.onjava.com/pub/a/onjava/2005/03/09/ejb-migration.html
This has all the details to create/modify the required xml (ejb-jar.xml,
jboss.xml etc) files for weblogic to jboss migration.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?modul
Hey but this link doesn't talk about any changes in ejb-jar.xml
and i have problem with element
here i m writing my ejb-ql element
|
|
i got the error saying that ...
encountered select
while xpecting
abs
sqrt ...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module
Hello Sir ...
May i know the solution as i am also stuck on the same problem
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4201205#4201205
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4201205
Georges,
Could you explain me how you solved "CLOSE_WAIT" problem by jbossnative?
We're using Apache(front-end)+JBoss(RedHat) too and we have "CLOSE_WAIT"
problem on AJP connector too. As result "CLOSE_WAIT" problem causes "too many
open files".
Andrew
View the original post :
http://www.jb
Consider this:
public interface AddressBeanBusinessInterface
| {
| ...
| public void delete( final Long key ) throws E, UnknownIdDeviation;
|
| public interface AddressBeanRemote extends EJBObject,
AddressBeanBusinessInterface
| {
| // empty - see the business interface f
Sure did [sorry for the late response]. I posted a similar question in the
JBoss Remoting Forum, and someone pointed me toward using the JBoss Unified
Invoker to accomplish this. The thread in the JBoss Remoting Forum is
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&t=152317.
At a hi
Hello klester,
I am newbie at jboss forums and am trying to use your guide to configure the
timeout in my Jboss server.
I've modified jboss-service.xml including the Mbeans UnifiedInvoker and
Connector; I've applied changes too in the standardjboss.xml adding the
invoker-proxy-binding and repl
701 - 800 of 1257 matches
Mail list logo
