[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: Message stranded in cluster

2007-11-20 Thread chip_schoch
Apparently I started one of my nodes the first time before I set the clustered flag in the queue definition because when I looked at the jbm_postoffice records one node had clustered set to false. By deleting the records then restarting the queue is set to clustered and it appears that everythi

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: Message stranded in cluster

2007-11-20 Thread chip_schoch
Ok, I finally got everything up and running on JBAS 4.2.2.GA and JBM 1.4.0.SP1. I use a ClusteredConnectionFactory to push messages to a clustered queue, and it is round-robining them to the partial queues as expected. Each of the services consuming these messages pushes another message on

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: Message stranded in cluster

2007-11-15 Thread chip_schoch
We use the windows servers to run some conversion services that use third party libs that are only available on windows. As the load increases we will be adding more conversion instances, so it really will be assymetrical. It seems a bit self defeating if we need to manually manage which linu

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: Message stranded in cluster

2007-11-14 Thread timfox
"chip_schoch" I thought that clients of the clustered queue could connect to whichever node they found first and they would get messages from any partial queue. Is this incorrect? [/quote wrote : | | This is correct, but you want to avoid unnecessary redistribution if you can. Redistrib

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: Message stranded in cluster

2007-11-13 Thread chip_schoch
Thanks Tim. I changed to XAConnectionFactory for the services that consume from the local node and that works fine. However, my cluster is running under RedHat but I have two non clustered JBoss servers running under windows. These are each running a service that is a consumer of messages tha

[jboss-user] [JBoss Messaging] - Re: Message stranded in cluster

2007-11-13 Thread timfox
Looks like you are sending message to both of the partial queues, but both your service instances are connected to the same node for consuming. For this kind of topology you probably only want each consumer to consumer from its local node? If so, then you should just use the standard connection