I think it would be good to get the information below into jira issue.
If you could check the jira search below to see if there is another issue that
is similar before creating a new one that would be great.
If there is not another issue that is similar please add a new one.
Would it make sense to create a jira issue for this?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4121427#4121427
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4121427
___
Hi,
Do You have any news on this performance issue? We are currently using Seam 1.2
and have enough performance issues as it is, so an upgrade to Seam 2.0 is out
of the question until we can be sure that the performance is significantly
better than in version 1.2.
Thanks!
View the original
Unfortunately no - I have been working on interoperability with OC4J, Weblogic,
and websphere.
We will be reviewing priorities and planned tests in the next several weeks. I
will carry on your concern. Rest assured that performance baselines and
benchmarks are among the top of the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : These are surprising results for me as well. I
will review them and compare with our own servers.
|
| I will be adding more tests and comparisons in regards to performance to
the Seam project as time goes on. I appreciate your work on this.
|
Hi Jay,
It
The debug mode for Seam would have a significant impact on your stats. Have
you set the debug mode for Seam to false?
In components.xml, try adding:
core:init debug=false /
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4111870#4111870
Reply to the post :
Hi lowecg2004,
Thanks for the tip.
Just modified the jpa-no-a4j.ear application adding :
anonymous wrote : core:init debug=false /
But same results than before (looking at Seam code, debug=false is the
default value).
So, for a constant throughput of 60tx/s, I have the following results :
cpu
So Monday
Hello !
Here is some more information about the load tests we executed.
If you want more information please tell me. Also, if you have an idea on how
we can achieve betters results, I'm interested (of course !).
Otherwise I think you can find some interesting comparative and
These are surprising results for me as well. I will review them and compare
with our own servers.
I will be adding more tests and comparisons in regards to performance to the
Seam project as time goes on. I appreciate your work on this.
Thanks,
-Jay
JBoss Seam QE.
View the original post :
Thank you very much for your concern Jay, I'm looking forward for any news you
might have on this subject - whatever it would be (configuration change, code
change or just different results than me).
I'll also be very interested about your performance results between plain jsf
and seam if you
Do your tests use JBoss microcontainer in all cases?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4111022#4111022
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4111022
___
There is also somewhat older article from JBoss about Seam performance, might
be interesting as reference information:
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/power/jbossworld_2006_june_jaffe.pdf
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4111025#4111025
Never in fact.
Why ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4111026#4111026
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4111026
___
jboss-user mailing list
I wouldn't be surprised if you don't get very high performance using
microcontainer because you're not using full JEE capabilities of application
server. But since you didn't use MC I can't comment on your numbers (I am not a
performance tuning expert).
Was the JSF (without Seam) application a
svadu wrote : I wouldn't be surprised if you don't get very high performance
using microcontainer because you're not using full JEE capabilities of
application server.
I really don't see how MC would explain performance gain between plain jsf and
seam. But I've never used MC. Could you explain
gonzalad wrote : svadu wrote : I wouldn't be surprised if you don't get
very high performance using microcontainer because you're not using full JEE
capabilities of application server.
| I really don't see how MC would explain performance gain between plain jsf
and seam. But I've never used
I'll send more info on Monday then.
Have a good week end and thanks for your help !
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=viewtopicp=4111038#4111038
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bbop=postingmode=replyp=4111038
svadu wrote : There is also somewhat older article from JBoss about Seam
performance, might be interesting as reference information:
http://www.dell.com/downloads/global/power/jbossworld_2006_june_jaffe.pdf
Thanks for this review, I've already looked at it, but read it once more (in
case
18 matches
Mail list logo
