[jboss-user] [Remoting] - Re: Received version 254

2008-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Alexey, Thanks for the information. I'll take a look at NetworkRegistry and JNDIDetector, although probably not for the next release. By the way, back when I had time to read novels, I was a big fan of Dan Simmons. I still can't get the ocean planet bathroom out of my mind. :) -Ron View

[jboss-user] [Remoting] - Re: Received version 254

2008-04-25 Thread aih1013
Ron, The only area I was needed to work on remoting improvement is NetworkRegistry. Our system is distributed among several DCs and we are unable to use multicast. Moreover, due specifics of our system, channels between DC are quite unreliable. So we tried to use JndiDetector. However, the Jn

[jboss-user] [Remoting] - Re: Received version 254

2008-04-25 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hey Alexey, I've you've found places where you were about to improve on Remoting's reliability, I'd be interested in hearing about them. Thanks, Ron View the original post : http://www.jboss.com/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4146735#4146735 Reply to the post : http://www.jboss.com/inde

[jboss-user] [Remoting] - Re: Received version 254

2008-04-24 Thread aih1013
Hi Ron! Yes, we have created a private branch with enhanced reliability. At the moment, there is no need to maintain the branch as we don't use NetworkRegistry anymore. So we will migrate to the latest release of remoting. I just wanted to be sure, the messages do not indicate a serious prob

[jboss-user] [Remoting] - Re: Received version 254

2008-04-23 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Alexey, The fact that the client side of a connection is seeing a 254 byte means that the ServerThread on the other side of the connection has closed its socket and returned itself to the threadpool. For example, it might have experienced a TimeoutException. It follows that creating a new