tasks are never associated with a state. Tasks are now just 'simple' tasks, not
'complex' tasks anymore (the task has been 'promoted' to the level of the
former task-node. That might be explicitly missing in the docs, I won't deny
that. But
What you describe is not a 'simple' scenario, it is a
"kukeltje" wrote : Yes, use a plain fork-join for this.
I still have to admit that I think the task-node approach is much easier to
work with.
The jbpm documentation should have more information about differences from the
jbpm 3.x way to model stuff. E.g. to associate tasks with a state.
How
Yes, use a plain fork-join for this.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257827#4257827
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257827
___
jboss-user mailin
"kukeltje" wrote : no there is not. And not sure if it will return as it was or
whether alternative ways (more bpmn like) will be implemented.
|
| What is the behaviour you need?
Im quite new to BPM and jBPM but I want to re implement an existing jBPM 3.x
process in jBPM 4, but the existi
no there is not. And not sure if it will return as it was or whether
alternative ways (more bpmn like) will be implemented.
What is the behaviour you need?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257650#4257650
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.o
Bumping this.
Is there any equivalent for task-node in jbpm 4?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=4257647#4257647
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=4257647
__
