Hi, all. My company has found a bug, which I've since entered at
SourceForge. Thought I'd copy/paste the details here to give it some
visibility and see if others have seen the same problem. Thanks!
Bug: 840496
https://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detail&atid=376685&aid=840496&group_id=22866
Dec 1 is the target date.
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
Phil Shrimpton wrote:
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 17:29, Scott M Stark wrote:
Hi,
The 3.2.3RC1 release is available from sourceforge here:
Thnaks. This fixes
On Tuesday 11 November 2003 17:29, Scott M Stark wrote:
Hi,
> The 3.2.3RC1 release is available from sourceforge here:
Thnaks. This fixes both my issues with 3.2.2.
Anyone want to make a finger in the air guess as to the final 3.2.3 release?
Phil
--
11:57pm up 64 days, 2:07, 1 user, loa
So if I wanted ALL jsp pages in my webapp to be compiled when it is
deployed would I change this part of the webdefault.xml file:
jsp
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
0
to this?:
jsp
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServlet
1
I tested this by creating a jsp page that does
Hello,
I have exactly the same problem as Rafal, but with the following JBoss-generated query:
"CREATE TABLE user (user_id INTEGER NOT NULL,login VARCHAR(250) BINARY,
password_ VARCHAR(250) BINARY, first_name VARCHAR(250) BINARY, last_name VARCHAR(250) BINARY,
gender VARCHAR(250) BINARY, email VA
Title: [JBoss-user] Need help with SSL setup. JBoss 3.2.1 Jetty bundle
This is desribed in the for-pay admin document, as well as in the free 3.0
Quickstart guide, that you can
obtain from http://sf.net/projects/jboss/
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] im Auftrag
What is the SQL query generated?
Your configuration does not match the DTD. Which is
Is it deployed w/o errors?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear sir
I am using jboss-3.2.2RC1_tomcat-4.1.24 backed by MySql.
I have an EJB 2.0 Entity bean in which I defined One-to-One relationship
Between Manufactu
You can add one or more external contexts to wars deployed to
a host by adding a Context element to the corresponding Host
by editing the jbossweb-tomcat41.sar/META-INF/jboss-service.xml
descriptor:
true
true
true
j_subject
Dear sir
I am using jboss-3.2.2RC1_tomcat-4.1.24 backed by MySql.
I have an EJB 2.0 Entity bean in which I defined One-to-One relationship
Between Manufacturer and Contact. In the Manufacturer table I keep the
foreign key of the Contact and here I have a CMR field called contact
that is mapped to
The 3.2.3RC1 release is available from sourceforge here:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
Changes notes are available here:
http://sourceforge.net/docman/display_doc.php?docid=19918&group_id=22866
--
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Grou
You should read the spec. At least relevant parts. You'll find many
interesting stuff and save everyone's time.
Steven Nakhla wrote:
You know, in all the tutorials or books I've read, I've never seen that
little tidbit of information. None of them said that only local
interfaces can be used.
Title: Message
Good
job they remembered to mention it in the spec then! :-)
(Section 10.3 of the EJB 2.1 spec if you're
interested).
--
Danny Yates
-Original Message-From: Steven Nakhla
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 11 November 2003
16:48To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject:
Again, the key point is that the cost of a jta tx is small. RequiresNew
introduces a new tx and new lock that is isolated from the encompassing
session tx. If used with an entity with commit option A caching or a
custom caching policy like option D(option A + timeout), then there is
no jdbc tx to a
You know, in all the tutorials or books I've read, I've never seen that little tidbit of information. None of them said that only local interfaces can be used. Thanks! I think that may help. I'll give it a shot.Alexey Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Just follow the spec. Only local interf
Thanks Scott,
All makes sense except why does RequiresNew minimize the extent of the
transaction lock. If anything I would have thought RequiresNew only
decreases performance because it creates a new transaction and can't use
an existing one if available.
Thanks very much for all your help.
Brian
You have to draw the workflow and note what primary key/tx
intersections there are to determine the contention. If
everything is marked as Required, then each top level session
access by a web page starts a new jta tx with a independent
session bean. There is no contention at this point. For
every
No, required is the default, and if the there are multiple getters
accessed in a work flow this just means that may not be able to cache
the values as they existed at the start of the workflow. There is
always a jdbc tx and this is distinct from the app server jta
tx.
--
Sc
Just follow the spec. Only local interfaces can be used in CMR. I have
done nothing else.
Steven Nakhla wrote:
Can you send me the code you used to do the test? Whenever I run my
test code, I get the exception I listed below. Did you have to do
anything special to JBoss to get it to work? I
Can you send me the code you used to do the test? Whenever I run my test code, I get the exception I listed below. Did you have to do anything special to JBoss to get it to work? I've been getting this same exception for weeks now!Alexey Loubyansky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It worked for me whe
On November 11, 2003 08:17 am, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
> I know ;)
>
> julien viet wrote:
> > yes it works well.
> >
> >>What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
Brilliant idea. I keep forgetting about filters. That'll really
simplify things, won't it? I'll give it a shot right awa
Hi Scott,
Thanks for your patience and help.
Yep, I understand that there's no such thing as web page locking,
but let me put it another simpler way:
Imagine a web page that views 100 records of a database
The web page calls a method on a session façade to view those 100
records.
This method
Hi Harm,
Is this the same as making the getters read-only?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 11 November 2003 08:57
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Clueless on transactions
I'm not sure... But once I
I know ;)
julien viet wrote:
yes it works well.
What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
---
This SF.Net email sponsored by: ApacheCon 2003,
16-19 November in Las Vegas. Learn firsthand the latest
developments in Apache, PHP,
It is about declared-sql queries. This covered in for-pay docs.
In jbosscmp-jdbc.xml in query element you can specify declared-sql like:
ejbSelect
java.lang.String
yes it works well.
> What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
>
> Neal Sanche wrote:
>
>> Hi Alexey,
>>
>> Oh, I am definitely using the servlet container in the same VM, and
>> although it's probably a really bad idea, I've been using Local
>> objects in my web view layer instead
What about using filters to begin/commit transactions?
Neal Sanche wrote:
Hi Alexey,
Oh, I am definitely using the servlet container in the same VM, and
although it's probably a really bad idea, I've been using Local
objects in my web view layer instead of constantly making value
objects all
Greetings,
I would like to know what diferences (advantages/disadvantages) exist
between using a relation and using a value-object?
I recently made this interface method to represent a relation but I also
inserted an optional value-object method.
/**
* @ejb.interface-method
* view
It worked for me when I used AddressLocal to establish relationships on
the server side.
Steven Nakhla wrote:
Yep. Not that the non-modified sources worked any better. I've
remedied the SQLException problem, but now I'm faced with this exception:
java.rmi.ServerException: RemoteException o
On Mon, 2003-11-10 at 19:34, Alexey Loubyansky wrote:
> I would remove about 80% of XDoclet tags first.
>
> 1. you don't have to copy them for setters if you have them for getters.
> 2. remove @jboss.target-relation
>
OK, I've done what you referred in issues #1 and #2:
/**
* @ejb.inte
> Thank you Sasha. What if I was deploying my war with an Ant project,
> 'unwaring' my war under webapp (i.e. I have a folder, let's
> say 'jemos' that
> represents my context). Is that enough that I put my folder
> under /deploy?
You have two possibilities:
- put your war FILE under deploy (co
Thank you Sasha. What if I was deploying my war with an Ant project,
'unwaring' my war under webapp (i.e. I have a folder, let's say 'jemos' that
represents my context). Is that enough that I put my folder under /deploy?
Thnks,
Marco
- Original Message -
From: "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PR
> Hi, I just changed my configuration from two separate bundles (Jboss +
> Tomcat) to one unique one.
Good.
> I have few questions, as the configuration is not exactly the same:
>
> 1) What is now the path for CATALINA_HOME?
You don't need it anymore. Remove it in fact.
> 2) How do I deploy no
Hi, I just changed my configuration from two separate bundles (Jboss +
Tomcat) to one unique one.
I have few questions, as the configuration is not exactly the same:
1) What is now the path for CATALINA_HOME?
2) How do I deploy now applications that before I was deploying under
CATALINA_HOME/weba
I'm not sure... But once I put an @ejb.transaction="Required" on all
setXXX methods of my Entity bean.
This made sure that only setters are in the transaction. When looking up
values there will we no transaction used...
Am I right about this?
Regards,
Harm de Laat
Informatiefabriek
The Nether
Title: Message
I am using jboss-3.2.2RC1_tomcat-4.1.24
backed by a MySql database.
In the MySql SQL I can limmit the number of
rows retrieved by a SELECT steatment by a LIMIT clause
How can I limit the number of objects in a
collection (of a findAll for example) when possebly huge amounts of
Hi
I am able to create the Virtual Directory for my application in Tomcat in Server.XML.
But I am deploying my application as WAR in JBOSS. So my WAR cannot talk to Tomcat
Server.XML file. Now I have to crate a Virtual Directory in Jboss related XML file. If
anyone knows please help me in this.
36 matches
Mail list logo
