I thought this had been fixed. Try "AND" instead of "and" (case sensitive, yes
I know, a shame) ;)
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854954#3854954
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=re
yes, if you are using the HAPartition for the RPC calls, it will work but I bet
that sharing the underlying JChannel will not work at all as I don't think it
could discriminate messages that should be sent to JBossCache and those that
should be handled by the clustering framework. Bela could fur
and does this actually work?!?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3854402#3854402
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3854402
---
This SF.Net em
and obviously, also works for the lazy:
http://www.jboss.org/services/prodsupport
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3851161#3851161
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3851161
--
what do you mean by "instance of a home": a home is not associated to any given
instance.
At least on the server, a single home proxy is generated and bound to JNDI.
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3850202#3850202
Reply to the
no.
split the "LB" ejb from the "workers" ejb.
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848320#3848320
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848320
-
the easiest is to run two instances of jboss on the same machine then.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848305#3848305
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848305
--
why do you want to change this behaviour? which use case?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3848292#3848292
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3848292
---
Hello,
Please try with a recent snapshot of JBoss (like 3.2.6RCx or 3.2.5), I bet you won't
get much feedback based on an old release of jboss.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3846137#3846137
Reply to the post :
http://www.jbo
pack all these files (ear, sar, etc.) in a single JAR and deploy it.
This is called the russian dolls packaging
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3844691#3844691
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&
you can put a tag on your timer mbean that waits on the name of the EJB container
MBean. As you cannot guess the name of the ejb container mbean, you need to go on the
jmx-console first, find the name, and use it in your depends tag.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?mod
Please try with 3.2.5, I don't think you will get much help in the forums if you don't
have a recent version of JBoss.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842276#3842276
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=b
no, it is not (yet?). It uses RMI/JRMP today.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3842018#3842018
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3842018
---
no, I don't think so right now, however that would indeed be useful information. You
do have the server start time available though => if you start your app with JBoss
(not using hot-deploy to deploy them much later), the value is the same.
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.ht
This specific problem was only in 3.2.4.
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3840244#3840244
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3840244
-
3.2.5 mainly fixes a single bug relative to clustering (but which blocks many users),
which is why there is not RCx
As for J2EE certification, we are certifying the 4.0 Branch (J2EE 1.4), not the 3.2.x
(which is an implementation of J2EE 1.3), so 3.2.5 is here to back nothing (except a
clusteri
when you get paid by the hour ;)
Cheers,
sacha
P.S.: or when you need two partitions for the SAME node, you need two different name
to reference them, but in that case you ALSO need to change the multicast IP
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3
"creatura" wrote : Do you think that the site www.lastminute.com runs JBoss ?
yes, it does. As well as many other customers. JBoss has references available if you
are actually interested by JBoss services (remember, we don't sell licenses).
Other than that, it is not because people do not answ
Which node do you redeploy when it doesn't work? the RO or the RW? anyway, I think you
can add a bug report on sf.net/projects/jboss as we should support redeploy of such
apps.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838638#3838638
Re
Yes, but it contains the full JBoss, right, not simply the Nukes service?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838188#3838188
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838188
---
>From where can the binary SAR be downloaded? do you have a link?
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838153#3838153
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3838153
--
Julien,
Do we have a xxx.war or xxx.sar standalone version that people can simply download and
drop in any jboss instance? That is what people need I guess, is this available for
download?
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3838129
I would instead use the DistributedState service: no need to implement anything, just
use it as is, very convenient to share configuration accross a cluster.
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3836606#3836606
Reply to the post :
ht
make sure you don't have iptables or any other kind of firewall running. Make sure
multicast is part of your kernel.
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3836605#3836605
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting
yes, your last2 trick should work. Otherwise, I think it is possible to add depends
tags in jboss-app.xml file as well, this should be in the DTD.
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3836209#3836209
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/
Then make sure ALL JBoss servers that you are starting as part of the cluster are
running the exact same version of JBoss. The exception message simply states that it
is not the case.
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3836064#3836064
Reply
Make sure you are using the good client side JAR i.e. if you are using JBoss 3.2.3 on
the server, use the 3.2.3 client side JAR, not the 3.2.2, etc.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3836028#3836028
Reply to the post :
http://www
you simply need to augment the backlog of the JNP service so it can queue enough
requests.
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3833940#3833940
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3833940
--
So, what is the feedback on that yohanfer?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832230#3832230
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832230
---
Th
... and which version of JBoss...
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832229#3832229
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832229
---
This SF.net
What are you trying to achieve? how many nodes? are the web and EJB layers deployed in
the same JVM or not? are you trying to load-balance HTTP requests or EJB invocations?
which jboss config are you using? default/all? how is your jboss.xml (your first post
is not complete), etc.
View the orig
> "Please investigate and fix."
You probably meant "Please investigate and fix IMMEDIATELY.", right ?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3832046#3832046
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3832046
Good to see you get good performance!
Networking is always an "interesting" player in clustering setup.
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3831859#3831859
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mo
Can you make sure the clustering is up? what is displayed by jboss when it you start
up the second node?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3830572#3830572
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=38305
Country
| local/Country
| True
| Clustered BMP EntityBean
| True
Do you have only local interfaces or also remote interface (only remote make sense in
clustering)
cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829790#3829790
Re
What makes you think that your cluster environment works? Are you sure you really have
deployed the clustering service?
Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3829744#3829744
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=
OK, so in fact there were two problems with the JGroups setup.
The first was due to the stack ordering as described above and can be fixed quite
simply by switching protocol elements.
The second one, is a problem related to garbage collection of clustering messages that
can lead to horphelin m
The ConcurrentModificationException is not a big deal, what is strange is the NAKACK
thing with the udpated stack.
Can you try with a 3.2.4RC?
Bela?
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3828934#3828934
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/inde
Bela, the message seems to indicate that a layer is missing in his stack.
Georgel, can you please post your OLD and NEW XML snippet (just the Jgroups
part).
Thanks.
BTW, please post in the forums otherwise people will not see your e-mail
(this was not a post on JBoss-user)
sacha
> -Origina
Bela,
the message seems to indicate that a layer is missing in his stack.
Georgel, can you please post your OLD and NEW XML snippet (just the Jgroups part).
Monu, can you make sure you have modified the GOOD file i.e. the cluster-service.xml
that is really used (the one ine the good JBOSS_HOM
All JBoss versions prior to 3.2.4 may have clustering generate this kind of exception
under load:
2004-03-28 02:47:27,450 DEBUG [org.javagroups.DefaultPartition] [Sun Mar 28 02:47:27
EST 2004] [ERROR] NAKACK.handleXmitRe
| q(): (requester=choqtap4:32794 (additional data: 19 bytes)) message wi
could you please try with the clustering bridge before trying the less-flexible JMS
bridge?
thanks. Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3828078#3828078
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=r
could you please try with the clustering bridge before trying the less-flexible JMS
bridge?
thanks. Cheers,
sacha
View the original post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3828077#3828077
Reply to the post :
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=r
You need to assign a worker id in your Tomcat engine configuration:
|
|
|
|http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827906#3827906";>View
the original post
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=reply&p=3827906>R
do you have a sample WAR archive I could use? I can then simply drop it in two
clustered JBoss instances and see how it behaves for me with default JBoss binaries.
sacha
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827766#3827766";>View
the original post
http://www.jboss.org/index
Are you sure your classes are Serializable?
Which version of JBoss?
What is your jboss-web.xml clustering configuration, if any?
sacha
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopic&p=3827715#3827715";>View
the original post
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=posting&mode=r
ok, let us know, it becomes better. But we are still way behind. Do you have a way to
measure individual times i.e. time of the servlet layer, EJB layer, DB access, etc.
and check which layers costs time?
3.2.4 should be released in 10 days.
http://www.jboss.org/index.html?module=bb&op=viewtopi
ECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss] -
> Apache2,mod_jk2,jboss3.2.3/Tomcat41 - ONLY sticky session lo
>
> Sacha Labourey wrote:
>
> > Which OS do you use with mod_jk2? Linux? If yes, with
> threading model?
>
> Yes, Red Hat 7.3/LinuxThreads. Apache
Which OS do you use with mod_jk2? Linux? If yes, with threading model?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Vladyslav Kosulin
> Sent: Monday, March 08, 2004 3:42 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] [Clustering/JBoss]
You should use UIL2.
Cheers,
sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 8:56 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user] Connection factories on 3.0.4
>
> All
>
> Can som
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Sacha Labourey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 12:12 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Clustered Session Bean problem.
> >
> >
> > Hint: how could JBoss
Hint: how could JBoss replicate your EJB without passivating it?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Egger Lothar
> Sent: Monday, February 23, 2004 12:03 PM
> To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
> Subject: [JBoss-user] Clustered Session Bean prob
You mean:
CIYMF
:)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Juha Lindfors
> Sent: Saturday, February 07, 2004 1:36 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] USING FORUMS INSTEAD OF LISTS
>
> yOn Sat, 7 Feb 2004, And
I guess that is because it will implicitely use the SUN JMX implementation
part of the JDK instead of the JBoss one.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Heinz-Dieter Conradi
> Sent: Thursday, February 05, 2004 10:28 AM
> To: [EMAIL P
A!!! Here is an excellent question
I was thinking exactly the same since the first post on that topic.
Does JBoss support clustered logging, clustered deployment, clustered JAR,
clustered code, clustered banana?
The answer is: blue.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED
That's something to modify in the jmx-console/web-console: we should
precompile JSP at build time.
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, January 18, 2004 12:06 AM
Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] Problems getting started ...
> Hey, thanks! The JMX
: Re: [JBoss-user] Change
partition name for JBoss cluster configuration
Hi Sacha,
You mean change the line
In cluster-service.xml?
Thanks
Simone
- Original Message -
From:
Sacha Labourey
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent
the easiest way to change it is ... not to change it but
simply change the multicast address so that there is no conflicts with other
clusters.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Boulatian,
MisakSent: Thursday, January 08, 2004 7:06 PMTo:
[EMAIL PR
> Sorry... but JBoss 3.2 can use interceptor? How?! I'm very
> interesting about
> this!
It is possible since JBoss 2.0.
Take a look at conf/standardjboss.xml and the documentation, it shows how to
write your own JBoss.xml file which includes such a stack definition.
Cheers
sacha
-
> It works now!! Since I couldn't ensure that everybody in our
> NFS system is
> running same version of JBoss,so I just changed the
> "multicast IP" of my
Great, yes, that is the simplest way to do it.
> JBoss servers and now the exception is gone and the two
> Jbosses are able to
> recognise
Well, the problem is that JBoss was doing NOTHING during 4 days...
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bill Burke
> Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 3:43 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] OutOfMemoryError after 4
artition]
> ViewAccepted: initial members set
> ===
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nishant.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sacha
> Labourey
> Sent: Monday,
file deployment,everything
> deploys as it used
> to do as I can see from "server.log".
> -
>
> Pls let me know in case of any more inputs!
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nishant.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[
vice.xml" which won't give this problem.
> I am attaching the "cluster-service.xml" which I got from the
> distribution.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nishant.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf O
Rod, all versions of JBoss are available integrated with Jetty, simply check
on sf.net:
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=22866
As for the problems you have with Tomcat, you are invited to mention them so
they can be fixed. Unknown bugs are called features. BTW, the Tom
You mean Solaris on Sparc vs. Solaris on Intel?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Clover, James
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 6:57 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] performance on Solaris/SPARC
>
> Yeah, I'
; Any clues?
>
> Nishant.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sacha
> Labourey
> Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:58 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Exception in JBoss Cluster startup
ot;cluster-service.xml" which I got from the
> distribution.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nishant.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Sacha
> Labourey
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2003 12:56 AM
&
Are you using your own (old) cluster-service.xml partition definition? I
think 3.2.3RC3 already uses the new package names i.e. org.jgroups instead
of org.javagroups.
sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Nishant Aggarwal
> Sent:
We need the stacktrace of the errors at least.
sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Nishant Aggarwal
> Sent: mercredi, 31. décembre 2003 05:03
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user] Clustering Problem in Jboss3.2.3Rc1_
Yes, go on the jmx-console, find your entity bean container Mbean, and you
will find an invalidate operation. You can call it through jmx.
Cheers,
sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Pedro Salazar
> Sent: mardi, 16. décembre
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.4 ...
>
> At 12:45 13.12.2003, Sacha Labourey wrote:
> >Sometimes, anonymous CVS can have a 24h delay
>
> is there possibility to get an read-only access without delay?
-
Sometimes, anonymous CVS can have a 24h delay
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rafal Kedziorski
> Sent: vendredi, 12. décembre 2003 17:42
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] JBoss 3.2.4 ...
>
> At 17:30 12.12.2003
I don't think it is fulll JMS Clustering, but a clustered invocation layer.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Bill Burke
> Sent: samedi, 6. décembre 2003 04:23
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user]
. sticky session using SLSB
For web client.
Subject:
RE: [JBoss-user]
clustering vs. sticky session using SLSB Date:
Tue, 25 Nov 2003
13:37:32 +0100 From:
"Sacha Labourey"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To:
Rémy posted a messsage recently on tomcat-dev: there seem to be a bug in the
latest mod_jk2 release. Can you try a mod_jk (release 1.xxx) instead?
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mike Lindsey
> Sent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2003 2
web client or fat java
client?
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
ECYSent: mercredi, 26. novembre 2003 04:40To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [JBoss-user] clustering
vs. sticky session using SLSB
Sorry for this stupid question, but if I NEED loa
Hello,
A few changes in the Tomcat HTTP Session replication code.
First, some unnecessary synchronization has been removed. This should lead
to better scalability and in some cases remove the impression that the
replication is "hanging".
Second, the replication has been improved. Without using A
when this happens, we need a full thread stack dump
(ctrl+break on windows), otherwise we cannot say.
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Brian
McSweeneySent: vendredi, 21. novembre 2003 12:09To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: [JBoss-user] http sessions
ities:
- put your war FILE under deploy (compressed), or
- expand (unwar) your file under deploy BUT the resulting directory must
end in .war => jemos.war/
The second solution allows you to dynamically modify your JSP without having
to redeploy your web app.
Cheers,
> 2) How do I deploy now applications that before I was deploying under
> CATALINA_HOME/webapps?
You put your WAR under the /deploy folder (i.e.
JBoss_HOME/server/default/deploy)
Cheers,
Sacha
xxxxx
Sacha Labourey
General Manager
Hello Christofer,
> From the point of performance, I can absolutely say : YES As
> I am doing some performance testing, the changes in the last
> few versions boosted the SPECjAppServer2002 about 20%
> And with the Relational read-ahead Bill is working on, I
> think this will give us ano
In fact, we don't need to secure the applet (that is not necessary as
nothing is really critical in the applet and the way applet are integrated
in browsers generates two auth step: one for the page and one for the
applet, so we should move the applet in another folder and make it
"non-private"
>
You may want to download that PDF:
http://www.oreilly.com/catalog/entjbeans3/workbooks/index.html
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> ARUN PRASAD
> Sent: mercredi, 29. octobre 2003 10:55
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user
Russ was interested to look at it, so maybe he will want to complete it to
see how the web-console is implemented
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> David Wade
> Sent: mercredi, 22. octobre 2003 04:50
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subje
I am not sure that is possible, but if you can do it, let us know how you
did it.
Cheers,
Sacha
xxx
Sacha Labourey
General Manager
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
xxx
From: [EMAIL
Or use the web-console, even better ;)
http://localhost:8080/web-console/
Cheers,
sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> julien viet
> Sent: jeudi, 16. octobre 2003 14:38
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [JBoss-user] How
> > Yes, at the moment, the limit is 64 columns.
>
> Kinda reminds me of a famous quote that went something like, "640k
> ought to be enough for anybody" :-)
LOL
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
SourceForge.ne
29
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] MacOS X Server JBoss Management Tool
>
> Is this also an open source initiative by Apple? Or is this
> tool closed
> source?
>
>
>
>
>
> "Sacha Labourey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent by
Apple.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Hunter Hillegas
> Sent: jeudi, 9. octobre 2003 02:23
> To: JBoss User
> Subject: [JBoss-user] MacOS X Server JBoss Management Tool
>
> I see that OS X 10.3 ships with a JBoss Management Too
Title: Message
Adrian is the best AS400 programmer in UK, so don't worry
;)
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ricardo
CoutinhoSent: mardi, 23. septembre 2003 17:06To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] Exception
Your MDB is transacted and the transaction has a timeout =>
- either make the timeout value higher
- or manages the Tx yourself in your MDB
Cheers,
Sacha
xxx
Sacha Labourey
General Manager
JBoss Group (Europe) SàRL
xxx
> -Or
Rafal,
Simply define your façade as clustered as even if you define your entity as
clustered, the call will always go to the local instance, never a remote
one.
Cheers,
sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Rafal Kedziorski
>
Well, I don't have anything in mind except that there may have a "leak"
somewhere in the GC of sessions. You've used tomcat or Jetty? Which http
session replication implementation? Optimize-it would give you that
information.
Cheers,
Sacha
> -Original Message-
>
That the memory usage is bigger is logical as many more objects are created
when using clustering compared to the non-clustered case. Furthermore, it is
up to the JVM GC to decide when to reclaim that memory. Maybe the memory is
used but could be reclaimed.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EM
> Rod Macpherson wrote:
>
> > That would definitely be more appropriate.
>
> The most appropriate approach is to answer the question where
> it had been asked,
> IMHO.
Please, let me address that very specific point on the wiki.
---
This
I will answer that question in the forums if you don't mind.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Darren Hartford
> Sent: mercredi, 10. septembre 2003 16:41
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [JBoss-user] forums versus mailing list
>
ernet that have _no_ multicasting
> support.
> As described in the cluster docu. i want to setup the servers for the
> cluster manually.
> Where/How i have to do that?
>
> Thanks a lot.
> Stefan
>
>
>
> Sacha Labourey wrote:
>
> >What are you trying
What are you trying to achieve Stefan? You seem to do very complexe stuff
for a quite basic scenario.
First rule: never ever change conf/jndi.properties in any of the JBoss
instance configuration: clustering or not, this rule remains: don't change
this file.
Cheers,
Sac
You are right Andrew. Most of the time (not to say always), you change the
REMOTE CLIENTS to use HA-JNDI but you NEVER change the server settings in
itself.
Cheers,
Sacha
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>
1 - 100 of 499 matches
Mail list logo
